Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is this SOP for a patdown?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 11:23 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,702
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
That's the best ya got?
For what you wrote, that's all you deserve. If you have something with a but more weight to say, please do.
SATTSO is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 11:39 am
  #32  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 158
Since we are discussing "pat-downs" when does a TSA "pat-down" become a "partial" and then a "full-strip" search?
Is there any documentation completed for any of the above searches and if so what are the TSA form numbers?
OnTheAsile is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 11:57 am
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,971
Originally Posted by SATTSO
For what you wrote, that's all you deserve. If you have something with a but more weight to say, please do.
I believe my comment opens up a very good area for discussion, how much security is enough?

Many things TSA is doing today is from unsuccessful attempts or attempts that were only in the planning stages, the shoe bomb and British Liquid Bomb planners.

I offer a known attempt that while not killing the intended target was a successful deployment of a weapon but TSA seems unconcerned about this and does no screening to intercept this type of weapon.

Now if you consider that this area of discussion has no weight then I guess I will just have to accept that security is really not TSA's objective.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 1:50 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: GS UA+3MM
Posts: 265
Originally Posted by aviators99
I am at FLL now. As always, I refused the naked scanner. I am used to getting the business at SFO. But here the guy did something different. He took the waistband of my pants and went around my waist, rolling it over. Of course since I was ordered to take my belt off, he could see completely down my pants the entire time. Is this something others have experienced?
This is SOP at FRA. They like to get fresh. Unfortunately the last screener wasn't my type.

s
swixo is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 2:48 pm
  #35  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
If security is really needed then why stop at just rolling down a waistband? Lets go for the full strip search and cavity checks. Can't be to safe!
And as confirmed by a TSO on another thread (and by female posters) women wearing skirts and dresses are often subjected to wanding between the legs in the US.

I have had 'intimate' searches in other countries but they were respectful and professional, and did not involve someone trying to have me lift my skirt in order to place a wand between my legs.
exbayern is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 3:24 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
Originally Posted by exbayern
women wearing skirts and dresses are often subjected to wanding between the legs in the US.
They're just looking for detonator tampons.
Wimpie is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 3:33 pm
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,971
Originally Posted by Wimpie
They're just looking for detonator tampons.
which will never be found by TSA's Child Porn Viewers!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 3:59 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
So for the past 8 years, people have been smuggling detonators in waistbands undetected ? That must explain all those airliners that have been blown from the sky.
Hmmm, so in my time as a Aif Force Security Policeman (13 years), since no armed attack was ever mounted on one of our secure areas, then we should never have been armed? Interesting uhhh... logic there Wally.
TSORon is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 4:31 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Ah, never mind.

Last edited by Wally Bird; Jul 17, 2010 at 4:42 pm
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 8:26 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by oldjonesy
I've got an explosive detonator in my pants you can inspect RIGHT HERE
Okay, I just sprayed coffee all over my computer monitor!!!
Jetbee is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 11:37 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: IAH & PHL
Programs: United Premier Silver
Posts: 326
This was the way we were taught to do pat downs when I worked for the prison system several years ago. So the TSA fellow probably had some LEO/CO experience.
RockyBalboa is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2010 | 11:58 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 861
Originally Posted by RockyBalboa
This was the way we were taught to do pat downs when I worked for the prison system several years ago. So the TSA fellow probably had some LEO/CO experience.
I find it disgusting that law-abiding citizens are searched like convicted criminals just because they want to travel.
docmonkey is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 12:17 am
  #43  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Programs: UA 2P, SPG Gold, Priority Club Gold
Posts: 60
Is there a prescribed belly patdown as well?

I got one the last time I was through BOS. Did not set off the WTMD, but the TSO officer just had me raise my arms while he patted my stomach and sides. Didn't go below the waist or above the sternum. Seemed sort of strange, guess I'm abnormally fat in the midsection.
t4gyp is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 8:17 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by docmonkey
I find it disgusting that law-abiding citizens are searched like convicted criminals just because they want to travel.
It's worse than disgusting.

You, I, and everyone else knows that >99% of airline passengers do not need to be screened at all. The government has failed to devise an effective method of identifying the <1% who do, so has simply passed that failure on to the traveling public.

Maybe it's not possible to identify those 'threats', but what ought to be possible is to drum into the thick heads of screeners, supervisors and managers that >99% of the time they are NOT dealing with a terrorist or criminal and should treat people accordingly.

Immediately following 9/11 there was a groundswell of support for improved screening (despite 9/11 NOT being a screening failure). A calm, rational approach could have built a co-operative atmosphere and a workable compromise between security and convenience. Instead of which the TSA took a confrontational approach from day 1 - remember breast milk, pond water, bookmarks, CMH ! - and has bolstered that outlook ever since. Beyond redemption now .
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 9:13 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,295
Originally Posted by t4gyp
Is there a prescribed belly patdown as well?

I got one the last time I was through BOS. Did not set off the WTMD, but the TSO officer just had me raise my arms while he patted my stomach and sides. Didn't go below the waist or above the sternum. Seemed sort of strange, guess I'm abnormally fat in the midsection.
Got that this am at PWM, I for the record am not fat, and quite in shape.

So, this whole waistband thing. What if one isn't wearing any underwear? I'd think that'd be a bit too personal at that point.
Do I warn them?
What if I set the metal detector off because of an "attachment" down under?
WIRunner is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.