Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Shoes vs. Bins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2010, 9:25 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Additional evidence that TSA cannot teach its employees even the most basic of tasks.
Oh, they can teach, doesn't mean they can force it to be learned.
unLogical is offline  
Old May 26, 2010, 11:07 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
The REAL policy is:
TSO's need a clear view of the shoes. (reason: shoe bombs etc.)
Shoes have to be seperate from the rest of your property.
They can go directly on the x-ray belt (easier for the passenger)
or if you're going to use a bin/tray they have to be by themselves.
Nothing on top, below, around or inside your shoes.

Now;
If your laptop and shoes fit in a bin/tray side by side, not overlapping, thats ok too.

**contradicting statement (nothing around, but if they fit side by side its ok)
just saves time saying directly on the belt, also people dont want to hear a long explanation for anything while traveling
kanyewesttx is offline  
Old May 26, 2010, 11:16 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,795
Originally Posted by kanyewesttx
The REAL policy is:
TSO's need a clear view of the shoes. (reason: shoe bombs etc.)
Shoes have to be seperate from the rest of your property.
They can go directly on the x-ray belt (easier for the passenger)
or if you're going to use a bin/tray they have to be by themselves.
Nothing on top, below, around or inside your shoes.

Now;
If your laptop and shoes fit in a bin/tray side by side, not overlapping, thats ok too.

**contradicting statement (nothing around, but if they fit side by side its ok)
just saves time saying directly on the belt, also people dont want to hear a long explanation for anything while traveling
You forgot to say that this applies only to those shoes that were on the passenger's feet as s/he approached the checkpoint. It apparently doesn't apply to shoes that are inside the carry-on bag that the passenger is carrying (possibly stuffed with socks or other items), because nothing in the TSA "rules" (as we're allowed to see them) says that shoes must be removed from carry-on bags.

Why is "directly on the x-ray belt" "easier for the passenger"? What if the shoe strings tangle in the rollers, or the shoes get knocked around and damaged?
RadioGirl is offline  
Old May 26, 2010, 11:45 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: SW Rapid Rewards, Hilton Honors, Marriott, Avis First
Posts: 4,831
Originally Posted by kanyewesttx
The REAL policy is:
TSO's need a clear view of the shoes. (reason: shoe bombs etc.)
Shoes have to be seperate from the rest of your property.
They can go directly on the x-ray belt (easier for the passenger)
or if you're going to use a bin/tray they have to be by themselves.
Nothing on top, below, around or inside your shoes.
How is it easier for the passenger? One of my colleagues at work has his shoe lace snapped and a gash put in the side of some nice Wing Tips when the lace snagged on something inside the machine and the TSO had to yank the shoe out thus snapping the lace.

If it had stayed in the bin, the shoe would have been fine.

Again, how is it easier for the passenger? I am not inconvenienced by having to slide a 1/2 pound bin on the rollers.
PhoenixRev is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 7:37 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by kanyewesttx
The REAL policy is:
Consistently ignored.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 10:06 am
  #21  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
You forgot to say that this applies only to those shoes that were on the passenger's feet as s/he approached the checkpoint. It apparently doesn't apply to shoes that are inside the carry-on bag that the passenger is carrying (possibly stuffed with socks or other items), because nothing in the TSA "rules" (as we're allowed to see them) says that shoes must be removed from carry-on bags.

Why is "directly on the x-ray belt" "easier for the passenger"? What if the shoe strings tangle in the rollers, or the shoes get knocked around and damaged?
yup-but remember, you're applying common sense to something the tsa does .

as to shoes and/or shoe laces getting tangled inside the x-ray machine......you end up with yet another overpriced government asset which doesn't work. yeah, this one worked as advertised but then the tsa found a way to break it
goalie is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 11:16 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Miami, Nice
Programs: Marriott Titanium, AA Concierge Key, Delta, United, Emorates, and others
Posts: 4,694
I don't understand the question. Is the OP implying that the TSA "policies" should be uniform? What ever happened by surprising the terrorist by confusing them about whether their shoes should be inside or outside of the bin? let confusion reign!
jbcarioca is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 12:38 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by jbcarioca
I don't understand the question. Is the OP implying that the TSA "policies" should be uniform? What ever happened by surprising the terrorist by confusing them about whether their shoes should be inside or outside of the bin? let confusion reign!
TSA running on pseudo-random noise generated policies? Say it isn't true. Chaotic checkpoint behavior most likely is due to people not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. Yet another manager failure system wide inside of TSA.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 1:44 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by kanyewesttx
The REAL policy is:
TSO's need a clear view of the shoes. (reason: shoe bombs etc.)
Shoes have to be seperate from the rest of your property.
Nope. They can be inside your carryon, stuffed with socks or dirty underwear.

They can go directly on the x-ray belt (easier for the passenger)
or if you're going to use a bin/tray they have to be by themselves.
Nothing on top, below, around or inside your shoes.
Nope. It's perfectly fine to have them in a bin with your jacket on top, even your Fourth Amendment zip-lock is usually OK.

Now;
If your laptop and shoes fit in a bin/tray side by side, not overlapping, thats ok too.

**contradicting statement (nothing around, but if they fit side by side its ok)
just saves time saying directly on the belt, also people dont want to hear a long explanation for anything while traveling
Saves no time, especially if they get caught or don't push out promptly. A bin will usually come out faster than shoes on a belt.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old May 27, 2010, 2:16 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: AA LT PLT (3.6+ MM), UA 1K LT Gold, Hilton LT Diamond, Bonvoy Gold.
Posts: 1,663
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
Yabut a pair of shoes inside a rollaboard that's stuffed will garner nary a second look.

In-bins or on-the-belt is a really stupid discussion for screeners to have when shoes inside a suitcase breeze through.
Yep, that's why I take my shoes off and put them in my rollerboard, nestled next to the other 1 or 2 pairs (depending on trip duration). Always funny to see the screener try to work out where my shoes are. As pointed out above, this demonstrates the total stupidity of the whole shoe carnival....

- Tim
timfountain is online now  
Old May 30, 2010, 9:01 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Ex Platinum & 1MM, DL PLT, Marriott Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,490
Originally Posted by kanyewesttx
The REAL policy is:
TSO's need a clear view of the shoes. (reason: shoe bombs etc.)
Shoes have to be seperate from the rest of your property.
They can go directly on the x-ray belt (easier for the passenger)
or if you're going to use a bin/tray they have to be by themselves.
Nothing on top, below, around or inside your shoes.

Now;
If your laptop and shoes fit in a bin/tray side by side, not overlapping, thats ok too.

**contradicting statement (nothing around, but if they fit side by side its ok)
just saves time saying directly on the belt, also people dont want to hear a long explanation for anything while traveling
GGG on Friday afternoon-laptop is in it's own bin (it's a 17-inch one; nothing else fits in the bin). Shoes & sandwich-sized Kippie w/a single 0.5 oz tube of hand cream in another bin. Smurfette, who was both moat dragon & loader, takes Kippie out of bin & puts it in it's own dog food dish.

I know these smurfs don't get alot of action-4 RJ flights/day, soon to be 2, doesn't leave much time to play w/all their toys, but if they truly can't 'see' what was in that bin w/o taking out the Kippie, then there is no way they had any idea what was in my roll-aboard. Oh, wait-that probably explains why everyone's rollaboard, or backpack, or computer bag, was 'selected for additional screening'
txrus is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2010, 11:22 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Programs: Delta DM & CRC, Continental PM
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
In-bins or on-the-belt is a really stupid discussion for screeners to have when shoes inside a suitcase breeze through.
BINGO!!! That's the heart of this insanity.

They can scan my PC in a bin just fine, why not my shoes? The bins are made of plastic which will not affect the x-ray anyway. But the real kicker is exactly what you've said. I could have multiple pairs of shoes in my bag, at any odd angle I choose...and they scoot right on through. But God forbid you should cross the high school drop-out who tells you where your shoes should go.
BigBen1861 is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2010, 11:50 am
  #28  
Moderator: Information Desk, Women Travelers, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 15,655
I had a TSA screener in STL tell me that the policy is deliberately inconsistent so the terrorists never know what to expect.

I laughed at him.
chgoeditor is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2010, 12:24 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
I had a TSA screener in STL tell me that the policy is deliberately inconsistent so the terrorists never know what to expect.

I laughed at him.
Now that's not nice. That Kool-Aid is powerful, addictive stuff.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2010, 1:57 pm
  #30  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Now that's not nice. That Kool-Aid is powerful, addictive stuff.
and pretty sticky when you get on you as well....

goalie is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.