Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Mayor Wants More Security at SFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 6:06 am
  #1  
Original Poster
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Post Mayor Wants More Security at SFO

SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS) -- Mayor Gavin Newsom Wednesday called for the addition of full body scanners at every security checkpoint at San Francisco International Airport.

SFO executive director John Martin, San Francisco Police Chief George Gascn and Mayor Newsom stood side to side at the airport's International Terminal which has been using a full body scanner for about a year to randomly check passengers for concealed weapons and explosives. Newsom said the devices use sound state-of-the-art technology that he would like see at every passenger screening location.

"We've really been a testing ground for this technology successfully. That's why we think we should be uniquely positioned front and center for any subsequent federal appropriation," said Newsom.

The mayor acknowledged concerns about privacy and criticism from civil liberties groups but said passengers don't seem to mind and not a single complaint has been received.
http://www.kcbs.com/Mayor-Wants-More...at-SFO/6054500

Not a single complaint has been received? Think that will change when you add these to both international checkpoints and all domestic checkpoints. I've never been through one on the international side. Wonder how widely used it is. Anyone been through it on that side?
tom911 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 6:09 am
  #2  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
I was going to write to the San Francisco city council and tell them that the reason I've stopped visiting is the disgusting groping fetish (in addition to all the other disgusting practices) of "team SFO". I guess I'll just stay away and continue to route any Asia-bound flights through LAX.
Spiff is online now  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 6:47 am
  #3  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
newsom is an idiot, obviously deaf, dumb, blind and does not read flyertalk . (and besides, when was the last time he went thru "regular security")
goalie is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 6:50 am
  #4  
Original Poster
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
I bet there's a lot of federal money in play here, and he doesn't want the City to miss out on its share. I wish AA hadn't bailed out on OAK. At least UA gives you a few options there still.
tom911 is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 9:02 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: DL PM, Hilton Gold, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Discoverist, Hertz PC, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 182
I just sent Mayor Newsom the following message through his website and would encourage anyone else who opposes these scanners to contact him as well:
According to KCBS you support the installation for full body scanners at SFO in part because "not a single complaint has been received." If that is still the case please consider this your first complaint on the issue. As an individual who flies through SFO on a fairly regularly basis I strongly oppose this initiative. Full body scanners are intrusive, expensive and, most importantly, ineffective. It has been repeatably shown that full body scanners almost certainly would not have detected the bomb carried by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and it is common knowledge that al Qaeda is already practicing defeating these devices. What we need is better intelligence gathering and cooperation, not more intrusive and pointless security theater. Short of subjecting all travelers to a body cavity search it is impossible to ensure that no one can ever get a bomb on a plane so, in my view, by the time a terrorist reaches the airport checkpoint the system has already failed.
At least, if he continues to claim not to have received a single complaint we will know he is lying.
LostSoul is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 9:32 am
  #6  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Flyertalk Cares
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,927
Another letter just sent.

And got a family member to send another.

(I've filed complaints about these. Either he's not getting them or he's chosen not to read them. What a disappointment he is.)

Last edited by l etoile; Jan 7, 2010 at 9:39 am
l etoile is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 10:00 am
  #7  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Flyertalk Cares
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,927
Originally Posted by tom911
I've never been through one on the international side. Wonder how widely used it is. Anyone been through it on that side?
Yes, been through told to go through it there (they often do 10 through the metal detector and then 10 through the scanner). I have always refused in favor of the 'enhanced" pat down and filed a complaint about the machines at the officer's request (claimed they were keeping records).

Either the complaints never filter down to Newsom or he's opted to ignore them.
l etoile is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 10:19 am
  #8  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by l'etoile
Another letter just sent.

And got a family member to send another.

(I've filed complaints about these. Either he's not getting them or he's chosen not to read them. What a disappointment he is.)
and another e-mail sent.
goalie is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 12:39 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,259
And another email sent. Now he has "several" complaints.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 4:21 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 861
Originally Posted by LostSoul
I just sent Mayor Newsom the following message through his website and would encourage anyone else who opposes these scanners to contact him as well:

At least, if he continues to claim not to have received a single complaint we will know he is lying.
I sent an email to Gavin Newsom and also left a comment similar to yours at http://www.flysfo.com/flysfocontactus/main

No response from mayor, but the response I received from SFO was

Originally Posted by FLYSFO
Mr docmonkey, Thank you for taking the time to write us regarding the screening technology discussed during yesterday's press conference. We appreciate any and all feedback regarding the airport and policies/procedures that impact our customers. I will be forwarding your comments to airport management and the TSA for review and consideration. Though I certainly understand your desire to move business to a location that you feel is best suited to your needs and requirements, I also want to advise you that at this time, SFO has only one of the imaging machines, located at International Terminal A. Customers who pass through that checkpoint can exercise their option to use a different method of screening if they so desire. Mr docmonkey, again, your comments are appreciated and will be immediately forwarded to those who need to be aware of public opinion on this topic. Best regards, xxxxx Customer Service Manager San Francisco International Airport

Last edited by docmonkey; Jan 8, 2010 at 2:43 pm
docmonkey is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 5:13 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Originally Posted by l'etoile
Yes, been through told to go through it there (they often do 10 through the metal detector and then 10 through the scanner). I have always refused in favor of the 'enhanced" pat down and filed a complaint about the machines at the officer's request (claimed they were keeping records).
I met one guy on a WN flight this summer who refuses to fly VX and B6 out of SFO because of the scanner.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 5:22 pm
  #12  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Flyertalk Cares
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,927
Originally Posted by tusphotog
I met one guy on a WN flight this summer who refuses to fly VX and B6 out of SFO because of the scanner.
Good point. I should probably write VX.

I did just get the generic all-purpose response from Newsom's office:

On behalf of Mayor Newsom, thank you for your recent communication. The
Mayor's Office appreciates the importance of the valued feedback we receive
from our concerned residents or other interested parties. Your letter and
comments have been received and duly noted.

Please know that Mayor Newsom regards all public input of this nature as
important and remains committed to addressing the issues and concerns of
all our citizens (and other interested parties) when and where possible.
Thank you again and I hope this information serves your purposes.
l etoile is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 6:01 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by goalie
newsom is an idiot, obviously deaf, dumb, blind and does not read flyertalk . (and besides, when was the last time he went thru "regular security")
I saw him a few years ago at SFO and he went through regular security, no escort, just by himself at terminal 3.
oogly is offline  
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 6:53 am
  #14  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by oogly
I saw him a few years ago at SFO and he went through regular security, no escort, just by himself at terminal 3.
the time i saw him, he was flying ua and he (with his entourage of 6 people [not all of which were part of his security detail]) were escorted by ua personnel thru the fam entrance (whoops, i meant the pax exit by the elevators on the departure level near door number 8 where the fam's show their i/d's and enter )
goalie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.