Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Accidentally left cell phone on, connected, during 2-hour flight.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Accidentally left cell phone on, connected, during 2-hour flight.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2009, 11:16 am
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by star_world
But that is actually beside the point. Why would you feel the need to prove that it is safe (to yourself? to others?) by deliberately leaving your device(s) on. On the basis that it doesn't work anyway, what do you possibly have to gain from this? It's the attitude I don't get - I understand the engineering involved to an extremely detailed level.
Why do airlines insist on having row 13 in their cabins? Why do they feel the need to prove that is it safe (to themselves? to the pax?) by deliberately selecting an unlucky number for a row? On the basis that it doesn't affect flight safety, what do they possibly have to gain from this? It's the attitude I don't get - I understand the superstition involved to an extremely detailed level.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2009, 11:30 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Originally Posted by mre5765
Why do airlines insist on having row 13 in their cabins?
How does superstition have anything to do with radio signals?
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2009, 11:47 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by star_world

But that is actually beside the point. Why would you feel the need to prove that it is safe (to yourself? to others?) by deliberately leaving your device(s) on. On the basis that it doesn't work anyway, what do you possibly have to gain from this? It's the attitude I don't get

Defiance

I refuse to submit to ridiculous policies anymore than I have to. Anyway as has been mentioned all it does really is run my battery down faster so why does it bother you?
harper99 is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2009, 11:57 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by Aus_Mal
How does superstition have anything to do with radio signals?
Superstition says both the number 13 and cell phones left on in flight can crash planes.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2009, 12:01 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Originally Posted by mre5765
Superstition says both the number 13 and cell phones left on in flight can crash planes.
There are scientific links between cell phones and electronic interference. There is no scientific proof that 13 is unlucky.

I'm not aware of any accident or investigation reports that show that having a row 13 is unlucky. I have however seen investigation reports that show inconsistencies when phones have been left on.
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2009, 10:59 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
The real "reason" for the no-cell phone policies for flights is that, back in the 90s, with the old analog and later TDMA systems, if you were flying at altitude and at speed, you were right on the edge of cells and on top of that, bouncing very quickly from cell to cell. It caused degradation on cell networks. Thus was born the complete BS that cell phone signals can affect plane comm systems. Look at it this way, comm systems work fine on the ground when people on board are using cells, They work fine when flying over land where the air is practically alive with signals from all the cells of all of the networks. It's sort of like TSA - kabuki theater used to disguise the real "reason" for a policy that, if known, would cause even the most docile sheeple to question it.

Modern GSM and CDMA systems aren't really affected, but they won't scrap the policy because it would make them look stupid. Plus, they really don't want people using cells on planes, which I agree with from a courtesy standpoint. And further, they'll probably want to charge people soon for the "luxury" of using their cell phones while at altitude.

I'm wondering that, when internet access becomes widespread available, how they'll handle VOIP usage by passengers.
catocony is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2009, 9:49 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by Aus_Mal
There are scientific links between cell phones and electronic interference.
Where are the links that show cell phones crash planes?
mre5765 is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2009, 10:10 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
Originally Posted by mre5765
Where are the links that show cell phones crash planes?
I didn't say that. What I said was "There are scientific links between cell phones and electronic interference."

It is much easier to certify particular devices used onboard (eg radio systems), than it is to certify every mobile phone made in the world - and that's before the dog chews on the case or the child manages to dip half the phone in the bath.
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2009, 11:50 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by catocony
I'm wondering that, when internet access becomes widespread available, how they'll handle VOIP usage by passengers.
They might disable ports commonly used for VOIP if it turns out to be a problem. That sometimes gets done for some internet services.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2009, 12:35 pm
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,930
The only reason I turn off the transmit mode of mobile phone in-flight is so that the battery is not drained by the phone searching for a signal.

I'd hate to see the cell phone bill, if I was talking to a colleague in Europe and was accidentally connected for over two hours!
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2009, 10:31 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by SwissYankee
The phone showed talk time of 2 hours and 25 minutes.

now the obvious question, what could have happened?
Heart attack #1 over... because it will never happen. Cell phones have been around nearly 30 years now and hasn't brought down a plane nor has it given anyone a cauliflower ear brain tumor that along with this legend is always brought up. Why do cell phones have this aura of mystery about them still...

Now onto heart attack #2... that 02:25 cell phone bill.
I'd be alot more concerned about that.
At least... that's just me.
LoganTSO is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 12:35 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,795
Originally Posted by LoganTSO
Why do cell phones have this aura of mystery about them still...
When I was a kid, people were scared of cancer from televisions (or something. Mom just said "don't sit so close." ). When I was a teenager, people were scared of cancer from microwave ovens. People will be scared of cancer from cell phones until the next major radio-based widget arrives.

Electromagnetic energy is the closest thing the modern world has to magic; people love the gadgets but figure there must be a bad side to it somewhere.
RadioGirl is online now  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 12:54 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
The only reason I turn off the transmit mode of mobile phone in-flight is so that the battery is not drained by the phone searching for a signal.

I'd hate to see the cell phone bill, if I was talking to a colleague in Europe and was accidentally connected for over two hours!
That is very true. When I accidentally left my phone on during a transcon, it went into analog mode while searching for a signal and drained the battery.
MWRFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 4:38 am
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by Aus_Mal
I didn't say that. What I said was "There are scientific links between cell phones and electronic interference."

It is much easier to certify particular devices used onboard (eg radio systems), than it is to certify every mobile phone made in the world - and that's before the dog chews on the case or the child manages to dip half the phone in the bath.
Where are these links to science between cell phones in a passenger cabin interfering with the electronics necessary to prevent a plane from crashing?

Did you know that nearly 100% of all planes that have crashed in history had a row 13, but planes were crashing before there were cell phones?

BTW, did you know that airlines give every pax the ability to completely saturate the plane with electro-magnetic radiation, that every FA can easily detect it, and the airlines do absolutely nothing about it?
mre5765 is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2009, 4:44 am
  #45  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,444
I a m probably going to get slammed for this comment, but...

I donīt believe that using cell phone on planes will make them fall from the sky, but I dread the day in which they are allowed. Can you imagine sitting next to an unknown person for hours and having to listen to their incessant and usually completely stupid chatter without being able to walk away?
BubbaLoop is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.