|
Thanks Harry! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif
Yes, the good ol' days of FT, eh? http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif Truly, I do not remember not answering, however. Please accept my very much belated apologies! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif Also, please kindly remember, however, that this thread is not about me! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif Has that not yet been made absolutely clear here? http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif Life is replete with coincidentances, and FT is certainly no exception. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif Please do contact me when you next find yourself up in the NYC metro area, in any case. [This message has been edited by doc (edited 06-20-2003).] |
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by doc: ... I harassed you by politely emailing you, rather than posting creative, smart ... remarks about you, and/or your post(s)! You did not post my private email info here, and I had no expectation that you would not post your interpretation of my private note, nor is it any violation of the TOS! Though it was you who ordered me to stop emailing you back, I'm not interested in peacemaking! You obviously do not want to stir up any trouble! While you are simply wonderful, I am just plain rude! What can I say? It's very clear. You said so, after all! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif We seemingly not only must agree to disagree, but truly we live on different planets! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif Have a great evening! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif -Mark</font> Am I the only person to see the incredible irony here? I just read this thread: --- <font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by robb: Doc, do you need any help? Has another Flyertalker annoyed you? Might I suggest you take it up with them in email? </font> --- from someone, the very same person who started this thread, again, in direct violation of the very FT TOS he alludes to, and also in an incredibly obvious, persistent conflict with his own behavior! And I never intimated, even in the slightest, that help was needed in the thread, nor called for it, did I? Nor did I ever say I was "annoyed," did I? I admiitedly did/do agree with a previous poster that it is embarrassing, if not disgraceful to the entire FT Community, and surely of questionable taste. I might add now that I also think it is disrespectful to Randy as well! I am frankly shocked that you, as a moderator on another board, do not agree with me? Or do you? Perhaps you already took your own advice and emailed Randy? BTW, why is it again that you started this thread rather than just emailed Randy again? As a moderator on another board, I would think you know very well what the proper proceedures are, after all, no? Why did you tell me not to email you again? Why did you post personal information, along with your wrongful interpretation of my private email message to you again? I just don't get it, sadly. Perhaps you could clarify this for me, thanks! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif -Mark |
Perhaps you could clarify this for me, thanks!
please don't 'clarify' - a pledge that goes to both/all sides. I learned that the kind of 'clarifications' of this (and similar topics/threads here and in OMNI) from any side will not really help the Peace Process on FlyerTalk, but to the contrary only help the ongoing kind of 'war process'! |
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by doc: http://www.flyertalk.com/travel/fttr...ML/005492.html --- from someone, the very same person who started this thread, again, in direct violation of the very FT TOS he alludes to, and also in an incredibly obvious, persistent conflict with his own behavior! And I never intimated, even in the slightest, that help was needed in the thread, nor called for it, did I? Nor did I ever say I was "annoyed," did I? I admiitedly did/do agree with a previous poster that it is embarrassing, if not disgraceful to the entire FT Community, and surely of questionable taste. I might add now that I also think it is disrespectful to Randy as well! I am frankly shocked that you, as a moderator on another board, do not agree with me? Or do you? Perhaps you already took your own advice and emailed Randy? BTW, why is it again that you started this thread rather than just emailed Randy again? As a moderator on another board, I would think you know very well what the proper proceedures are, after all, no? Why did you tell me not to email you again? Why did you post personal information, along with your wrongful interpretation of my private email message to you again? I just don't get it, sadly. Perhaps you could clarify this for me, thanks! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/smile.gif -Mark </font> Have a great evening! |
Can't one of you be wise enough to 'let this drop?' Please.
Dan |
I do not agree with everything Dan says, but on this one I am with him 105%. |
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SEA_Tigger: Pretty much you just have to accept the status quo, or move on when your own personal tolerance is exceeded.</font> Very well said! ------------------ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin |
Oz,
We seem to agree with what's best for Flyertalk. Maybe some posters can learn from us. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/eek.gif http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif |
Whats wrong with a nice heated debate...? And, what better topic than politics, sex, or religion...?
(ducking) http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif |
Gaucho - my Daddy always said it is never polite (or terribly smart!) to discuss sex, politics or religion in mixed company.
There is however, always BEER to talk about. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:35 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.