Community
Wiki Posts
Search

USA-LHR BA vs AA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 2:29 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, London and Malaga
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 234
USA-LHR BA vs AA

Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
ethan is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 2:49 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by ethan
Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
AA F is better in that respect than BA J. Bigger, softer bed. Much less crowed cabin. During the day I still prefer AA F to BA J. Of course, the difference should be greater than it actually is.
millionmiler is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 3:42 pm
  #3  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
Originally Posted by ethan
Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
IMO no airline seat/bed can hold a candle to a bed bed. Sadly there are no daylight flights from the west coast to LHR, nor are there any on BA from Canada. I certainly find the extra night I spend on the east coast (to allow for the daytime flight to LHR the next day) is well worth it, in terms of jetlag and productivity once one arrives in the UK. But I just don't sleep (much) on planes. YMMV.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 8:40 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
Originally Posted by ethan
Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
AA F, probably for both. Comparing AA F to BA F is a little trickier...
ijgordon is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 10:56 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Considering your an EXP as opposed to a BA Gold, I would also suggest you stick to AA as you won't get mileage on BA. Staff also tend to treat members of their own programmes better than alliance passengers onboard.

I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
Traveloguy is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 11:02 am
  #6  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Considering your an EXP as opposed to a BA Gold, I would also suggest you stick to AA as you won't get mileage on BA. Staff also tend to treat members of their own programmes better than alliance passengers onboard.

I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
Of course the OP would get AA miles on BA YVR-LHR. Only US-London BA flights don't get miles on AA.

One thing in favor (?) of AA LAX-LHR in F is the high probability of some media persona being in the same cabin. Browse this thread.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 12:26 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, London and Malaga
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 234
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
To add another opinion into the mix, I have never had any problems since being EXP (nor before for that matter!), but then again I've never run into problems that have needed any assistance! Thanks everyone for your help. Very happy that there is a consensus - I was afraid there may have been fors and againsts!

Last edited by ethan; Mar 30, 2006 at 12:37 pm
ethan is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 1:29 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by ijgordon
AA F, probably for both. Comparing AA F to BA F is a little trickier...
Its not that tricky. BA F is better than AA F.
millionmiler is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 1:32 pm
  #9  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
deleted

Last edited by millionmiler; Mar 31, 2006 at 6:44 pm
millionmiler is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 2:25 pm
  #10  
Community Director Emerita
50 Countries Visited
80 Nights
5M
100 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anywhere warm
Posts: 35,578
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
I have flown many flights on BA around the world. I have seen no evidence of this whatsoever.
SanDiego1K is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 2:59 pm
  #11  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
IIRC it says "OW Sapphire" or "Emerald" on BA paper tickets, with the AAdvantage number in very small print. I've certainly never felt under-served by BA. Maybe the BA Golds get the exit seats in NCW upstairs, but aside from that I don't know the difference. I really don't have any all-encompassing things negative to say about either airline in business or better.

I feel like I'm treated better in most BA lounges than in most ACs, FWIW.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 1:11 pm
  #12  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MEL/LAX
Programs: AAdv GLD(MM), QF LTS, UA MP_nada, HH Gld, SPG, GoldenCircle Jade
Posts: 4,478
Originally Posted by Traveloguy

I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
I think this is confined to the instances where access to BA lounges requires the pax to present their AAdv card.
alect is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 6:44 pm
  #13  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by alect
I think this is confined to the instances where access to BA lounges requires the pax to present their AAdv card.
I agree that BA's lounge dragons can be quite harsh to AA flyers. Its only happened to me once but I've seen them do it to others many other times.
millionmiler is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 1:57 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
Originally Posted by millionmiler
Its not that tricky. BA F is better than AA F.
AA Flagship suites are better than BA F seats, so it is trickier...
ijgordon is offline  
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 4:58 pm
  #15  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,171
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
I feel like I'm treated better in most BA lounges than in most ACs, FWIW.
I also feel like I'm treated better on board and at the airport on BA than on AA, even as an elite. Hey, I think I actually was treated better on an AWARD ticket in Y on BA than I was on my almost full fare, got ripped off when I could have flown JAL/ANA for less economy ticket on AA!

They're just so much more eager to help on BA. Not quite like trying to help on SQ, but better than on AA!
aa4ever is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.