USA-LHR BA vs AA
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, London and Malaga
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 234
USA-LHR BA vs AA
Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
#2


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by ethan
Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
#3
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
Originally Posted by ethan
Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
Originally Posted by ethan
Which is better - flying YVR-LHR BA J or LAX-LHR AA F? Sleep is the priority - night flights. I'm 6ft. Would the answer be different for a day flight in terms of the overall experience?
#5
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Considering your an EXP as opposed to a BA Gold, I would also suggest you stick to AA as you won't get mileage on BA. Staff also tend to treat members of their own programmes better than alliance passengers onboard.
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
#6
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
Considering your an EXP as opposed to a BA Gold, I would also suggest you stick to AA as you won't get mileage on BA. Staff also tend to treat members of their own programmes better than alliance passengers onboard.
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
One thing in favor (?) of AA LAX-LHR in F is the high probability of some media persona being in the same cabin. Browse this thread.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, London and Malaga
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 234
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
Last edited by ethan; Mar 30, 2006 at 12:37 pm
#10
Community Director Emerita




Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anywhere warm
Posts: 35,578
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
#11
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,526
IIRC it says "OW Sapphire" or "Emerald" on BA paper tickets, with the AAdvantage number in very small print. I've certainly never felt under-served by BA. Maybe the BA Golds get the exit seats in NCW upstairs, but aside from that I don't know the difference. I really don't have any all-encompassing things negative to say about either airline in business or better.
I feel like I'm treated better in most BA lounges than in most ACs, FWIW.
I feel like I'm treated better in most BA lounges than in most ACs, FWIW.
#12


Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MEL/LAX
Programs: AAdv GLD(MM), QF LTS, UA MP_nada, HH Gld, SPG, GoldenCircle Jade
Posts: 4,478
Originally Posted by Traveloguy
I also believe there is also a general concensus that BA treats AA members like dirt.
#13


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by alect
I think this is confined to the instances where access to BA lounges requires the pax to present their AAdv card.
#15


Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,171
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
I feel like I'm treated better in most BA lounges than in most ACs, FWIW.
They're just so much more eager to help on BA. Not quite like trying to help on SQ, but better than on AA!

