Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

New oneworld itinerary validator

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New oneworld itinerary validator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 11:20 am
  #256  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,446
Originally Posted by rabble
You have to dig through pages and pages of comments to find a service which is up. Can somebody put up a sticky on the first page of this tread with the links to the calculator?
The OW useful reference links sticky has a link to both the tool and the thread, in the section near the top for "Unofficial OW Website". Why that section and not the RTW section you may ask? Because the validator is useful for far more than just xONEx planning.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 3:54 am
  #257  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA 2MM - PLT, BA GGL, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,221
Tool has different interpretation of rule compared to OW itn planner

I have been playing around, as one does, with various routings which I may or may not be taking in the future and discovered the following anomaly.

If you put the routing JNB-LHR-IST-LHR-MCT-LHR-SIN-NRT-HKG-YYZ-DFW-SEA-DFW-YVR-JFK-LHR-NBO into Mileage Monkey it reports that everything is OK.

However if I put the same routing in the OW calculator it says I need to add one more surface sector to get back to JNB.

Looking at the OW rules it states:

Originally Posted by oneworld.com
(c) Travel may originate at any point for which fares are published and must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows
(a) within the country of origin
(b) within the Middle East
(c) between the United States and Canada
(d) between HKG and China
(e) between Malaysia and SIN
(f) within Africa
My understanding of the above is that a last surface sector is required to get back to the point of origin. This of course, since the rules changed, would count as one of the 16. It is this interpretation that the OW Itn Planner is using.

However just to confuse the issue if I take out the YVR-JFK-LHR and replace with YVR-LHR and add a surface sector NBO-JNB in the OW Itn Planner then it says it is valid. It also states that I have only used 15 of my 16 sectors.

Does anyone have any experience of how this really should be interpreted?
Moomba is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 4:15 am
  #258  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
IME, "Mileagemonkey" is generally more au fait with the rules the the "oneworld planner".

"(f) within Africa" is your friend here ...
serfty is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 4:32 am
  #259  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA 2MM - PLT, BA GGL, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,221
Originally Posted by serfty
IME, "Mileagemonkey" is generally more au fait with the rules the the "oneworld planner".

"(f) within Africa" is your friend here ...
Yes I understand that but OW rules state "....must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:..."

Does that last surface segment between detination and origin not count as one of the 16? The rules now count surface sectors when they did not do so in the past.
Moomba is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 6:44 am
  #260  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Surely we'd have heard a few screams by now from people looking, for example, to start and end in different US cities if this were the case? I haven't heard/seen any.
christep is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 10:57 am
  #261  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roses, Costa Brava, Spain
Programs: Seniors Bus Pass, lots of old plastic claiming to be precious metal
Posts: 512
Originally Posted by Moomba
Yes I understand that but OW rules state "....must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:..."

Does that last surface segment between detination and origin not count as one of the 16? The rules now count surface sectors when they did not do so in the past.
This question has been asked and answered many times in the past. That final 'surface' segment does not count towards the 16, despite some appearances to the contrary. As an example, I got my full quota with an itinerary starting in CPT & finishing in DAR. Absolutely no question of knocking off a segment to get back to CPT.

The Starfile wording on this point is hardly a model of clarity, but that also applies elsewhere within that 'document'. The rules as practically interpreted by the carriers are what really count, and FT is a superb forum for disseminating their interpretations to this community.
satprof is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 3:47 pm
  #262  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AAdvantage EXP
Posts: 1,482
I hope this is the correct place for this. I have used this tool extensively and think it is one of the best things on the web. Iam planning some India work and trying to ensure I can keep on OW and I tried to do some mileage calcs to Jaipur - JAI - and the city was not recognised. I know I wont be able to fly into Jaipur on OW but I can make some connecions so it would be great to know the distance from various places to JAI.
Cheers
S
simongr is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 3:54 pm
  #263  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
I would try selecting "Ignore errors (for expert users!)", the calculations you are after are then done.

But this won't help as "JAI" is an "Unknown" city.

I guess you can still put your route into http://gc.kls2.com/ ...
serfty is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 3:57 pm
  #264  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AAdvantage EXP
Posts: 1,482
The error is more the fact that wen even doing point-to-point calcs that JAI is not recognised.
simongr is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 10:54 pm
  #265  
SLF
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by Pteropous
AY's E70 and E90 offer J if flown on a J-route; similarly 319/320/321 do not offer J if flown on Y-only route. (and this even applies to terrible 75Ws and FinnComm's ER4s) All narrow-bodies are in movable curtain configuration, and the classes offer only depend on the route - aircraft has no significance. I'm pretty sure the same is applicable to BA/IB/MA narrow-bodies at least to some extent.
Thanks - the trouble is, I don't know which the AY Y-only routes are . If anyone can give me a list, or even better a method of working it out (e.g. distances less than a certain amount) I can incorporate it into MM.

We did establish that although BA domestics have Y-only cabins, that they do sell J tickets for those which do come with the associated benefits (lounge access, points etc.) - so you only miss out on the cabin really for these. Hence MM treats all BA services (aircraft type permitting) as having J as well as Y.
SLF is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 11:09 pm
  #266  
SLF
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Originally Posted by simongr
I hope this is the correct place for this. I have used this tool extensively and think it is one of the best things on the web. Iam planning some India work and trying to ensure I can keep on OW and I tried to do some mileage calcs to Jaipur - JAI - and the city was not recognised. I know I wont be able to fly into Jaipur on OW but I can make some connecions so it would be great to know the distance from various places to JAI.
I've added JAI to the cities database (which is separate to the flights database), so you should be able to do this now. I'm glad you find MM useful - note that most of the credit rests with hauteboy as the original creator.
SLF is offline  
Old Dec 11, 2008 | 3:24 pm
  #267  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AAdvantage EXP
Posts: 1,482
Many thanks
simongr is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 9:20 am
  #268  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AKL
Programs: QF WP & AA EXP
Posts: 5,233
Hi SLF,

With AA's recent announcement of direct DFW-MAD v.v. flights starting May, I was wondering if you could please add this to MM?

DFW-MAD on AA36 is a 763 with jy
MAD-DFW on AA37 is a 763 with jy

Cheers! ^
wijomas is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 10:55 pm
  #269  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by Moomba
If you put the routing JNB-LHR-IST-LHR-MCT-LHR-SIN-NRT-HKG-YYZ-DFW-SEA-DFW-YVR-JFK-LHR-NBO into Mileage Monkey it reports that everything is OK.

However if I put the same routing in the OW calculator it says I need to add one more surface sector to get back to JNB.
Hi Moomba.

Thought the Mileage Monkey and the OW calculator were the same. I'm using Milleage Monkey 0.95021 from http://slfft.allhyper.com/0.95/award.htm.

Could you tell where is the OW calculator?
Gracos is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 10:56 pm
  #270  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
Mileage Monkey validates xONEx type fares - so you are using the wrong tool.

The xONEx rules can be found here: http://www.oneworld.com/content/libr...rule_sheet.pdf

A synopsis/FAQ's of the fare can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...cket-faqs.html
serfty is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.