New oneworld itinerary validator
#256
Moderator, Hilton Honors



Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,446
#257
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA 2MM - PLT, BA GGL, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,221
Tool has different interpretation of rule compared to OW itn planner
I have been playing around, as one does, with various routings which I may or may not be taking in the future and discovered the following anomaly.
If you put the routing JNB-LHR-IST-LHR-MCT-LHR-SIN-NRT-HKG-YYZ-DFW-SEA-DFW-YVR-JFK-LHR-NBO into Mileage Monkey it reports that everything is OK.
However if I put the same routing in the OW calculator it says I need to add one more surface sector to get back to JNB.
Looking at the OW rules it states:
My understanding of the above is that a last surface sector is required to get back to the point of origin. This of course, since the rules changed, would count as one of the 16. It is this interpretation that the OW Itn Planner is using.
However just to confuse the issue if I take out the YVR-JFK-LHR and replace with YVR-LHR and add a surface sector NBO-JNB in the OW Itn Planner then it says it is valid. It also states that I have only used 15 of my 16 sectors.

Does anyone have any experience of how this really should be interpreted?
If you put the routing JNB-LHR-IST-LHR-MCT-LHR-SIN-NRT-HKG-YYZ-DFW-SEA-DFW-YVR-JFK-LHR-NBO into Mileage Monkey it reports that everything is OK.
However if I put the same routing in the OW calculator it says I need to add one more surface sector to get back to JNB.
Looking at the OW rules it states:
Originally Posted by oneworld.com
(c) Travel may originate at any point for which fares are published and must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows
(a) within the country of origin
(b) within the Middle East
(c) between the United States and Canada
(d) between HKG and China
(e) between Malaysia and SIN
(f) within Africa
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows
(a) within the country of origin
(b) within the Middle East
(c) between the United States and Canada
(d) between HKG and China
(e) between Malaysia and SIN
(f) within Africa
However just to confuse the issue if I take out the YVR-JFK-LHR and replace with YVR-LHR and add a surface sector NBO-JNB in the OW Itn Planner then it says it is valid. It also states that I have only used 15 of my 16 sectors.

Does anyone have any experience of how this really should be interpreted?
#258
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
IME, "Mileagemonkey" is generally more au fait with the rules the the "oneworld planner".
"(f) within Africa" is your friend here ...
"(f) within Africa" is your friend here ...
#259
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Programs: AA 2MM - PLT, BA GGL, SPG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,221
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:..."
Does that last surface segment between detination and origin not count as one of the 16? The rules now count surface sectors when they did not do so in the past.
#261

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roses, Costa Brava, Spain
Programs: Seniors Bus Pass, lots of old plastic claiming to be precious metal
Posts: 512
Yes I understand that but OW rules state "....must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:..."
Does that last surface segment between detination and origin not count as one of the 16? The rules now count surface sectors when they did not do so in the past.
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:..."
Does that last surface segment between detination and origin not count as one of the 16? The rules now count surface sectors when they did not do so in the past.
The Starfile wording on this point is hardly a model of clarity, but that also applies elsewhere within that 'document'. The rules as practically interpreted by the carriers are what really count, and FT is a superb forum for disseminating their interpretations to this community.
#262
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AAdvantage EXP
Posts: 1,482
I hope this is the correct place for this. I have used this tool extensively and think it is one of the best things on the web. Iam planning some India work and trying to ensure I can keep on OW and I tried to do some mileage calcs to Jaipur - JAI - and the city was not recognised. I know I wont be able to fly into Jaipur on OW but I can make some connecions so it would be great to know the distance from various places to JAI.
Cheers
S
Cheers
S
#263
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
I would try selecting "Ignore errors (for expert users!)", the calculations you are after are then done.
But this won't help as "JAI" is an "Unknown" city.
I guess you can still put your route into http://gc.kls2.com/ ...
But this won't help as "JAI" is an "Unknown" city.
I guess you can still put your route into http://gc.kls2.com/ ...
#265




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
AY's E70 and E90 offer J if flown on a J-route; similarly 319/320/321 do not offer J if flown on Y-only route. (and this even applies to terrible 75Ws and FinnComm's ER4s) All narrow-bodies are in movable curtain configuration, and the classes offer only depend on the route - aircraft has no significance. I'm pretty sure the same is applicable to BA/IB/MA narrow-bodies at least to some extent.
. If anyone can give me a list, or even better a method of working it out (e.g. distances less than a certain amount) I can incorporate it into MM.We did establish that although BA domestics have Y-only cabins, that they do sell J tickets for those which do come with the associated benefits (lounge access, points etc.) - so you only miss out on the cabin really for these. Hence MM treats all BA services (aircraft type permitting) as having J as well as Y.
#266




Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
I hope this is the correct place for this. I have used this tool extensively and think it is one of the best things on the web. Iam planning some India work and trying to ensure I can keep on OW and I tried to do some mileage calcs to Jaipur - JAI - and the city was not recognised. I know I wont be able to fly into Jaipur on OW but I can make some connecions so it would be great to know the distance from various places to JAI.
#268
In memoriam
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AKL
Programs: QF WP & AA EXP
Posts: 5,233
Hi SLF,
With AA's recent announcement of direct DFW-MAD v.v. flights starting May, I was wondering if you could please add this to MM?
DFW-MAD on AA36 is a 763 with jy
MAD-DFW on AA37 is a 763 with jy
Cheers! ^
With AA's recent announcement of direct DFW-MAD v.v. flights starting May, I was wondering if you could please add this to MM?
DFW-MAD on AA36 is a 763 with jy
MAD-DFW on AA37 is a 763 with jy
Cheers! ^
#269
Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 32
Thought the Mileage Monkey and the OW calculator were the same. I'm using Milleage Monkey 0.95021 from http://slfft.allhyper.com/0.95/award.htm.
Could you tell where is the OW calculator?
#270
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,337
Mileage Monkey validates xONEx type fares - so you are using the wrong tool.
The xONEx rules can be found here: http://www.oneworld.com/content/libr...rule_sheet.pdf
A synopsis/FAQ's of the fare can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...cket-faqs.html
The xONEx rules can be found here: http://www.oneworld.com/content/libr...rule_sheet.pdf
A synopsis/FAQ's of the fare can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...cket-faqs.html

