RTW - Different Starting and Ending City
#2
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI USA UA 1K, AA EXP 1MM, SQ PPS, BA GOLD, Hyatt D, Hertz Plat and AMEX Cent
Posts: 2,996
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by prudentbear:
Is it possible to start RTW itinerary in one city and end in a different city???</font>
Is it possible to start RTW itinerary in one city and end in a different city???</font>
#3




Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,023
From my reading of the rules I believe you can only do this if the different city is in the country of origin - not just the same continent. e.g. Start from SYD end in MEL, but not for arguments sake AKL.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">D.TRAVEL MUST BEGIN AND END AT THE SAME POINT EXCEPT ORIGIN - DESTINATION SURFACE SEGMENT PERMITTED WITHIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
E.OPEN JAW AT ORIGIN IS PERMITTED PROVIDED IT IS WITHIN THE ONE COUNTRY.</font>
E.OPEN JAW AT ORIGIN IS PERMITTED PROVIDED IT IS WITHIN THE ONE COUNTRY.</font>
#4
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Boca Raton, FL DL FO/MM AA EXP SPG PLT
Posts: 968
Well, both previous posters are correct but a little expansion may be helpful.
You cannot fly a segment (or two or three or ...) that you have booked at the end of the trip but you will be liable for the point to point fares for the segments you have flown if the issuing carrier chooses to come after you. We have not had any reports of this happening to an FT'er but it could. (Note that special exceptions apply to deaths, illnesses, etc.)
To adhere to the letter of the rules you have to end up in the same country or, in some cases, in the same geographic region (e.g. US/Canada; Middle East; Africa; South America; and a few other less likely spots) that you started from.
You cannot fly a segment (or two or three or ...) that you have booked at the end of the trip but you will be liable for the point to point fares for the segments you have flown if the issuing carrier chooses to come after you. We have not had any reports of this happening to an FT'er but it could. (Note that special exceptions apply to deaths, illnesses, etc.)
To adhere to the letter of the rules you have to end up in the same country or, in some cases, in the same geographic region (e.g. US/Canada; Middle East; Africa; South America; and a few other less likely spots) that you started from.
#5


Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: LAX
Posts: 3,641
I'm not sure how clear the sum of the replies have been.
Afaik (based on several booked and completed OWE's) there is no reason to include an unused segment showing you returning to your originating city, mgm's quote of a rule notwithstanding. Your booked itin will have to show a segment that returns you, as exmo said, to the country or region from which you started.
(On the other side of the coin, while we're talking rules, remember that you are not allowed to pass through your originating city near the end of your rtw. If you start e.g. from LAX and fly back into LAX (or co-terminals) your trip is over. So if you intent is to fly some additional segments in the country of origin be sure to return, in this example, to SFO or some other place.)
[This message has been edited by JohnAx (edited Dec 22, 2003).]
Afaik (based on several booked and completed OWE's) there is no reason to include an unused segment showing you returning to your originating city, mgm's quote of a rule notwithstanding. Your booked itin will have to show a segment that returns you, as exmo said, to the country or region from which you started.
(On the other side of the coin, while we're talking rules, remember that you are not allowed to pass through your originating city near the end of your rtw. If you start e.g. from LAX and fly back into LAX (or co-terminals) your trip is over. So if you intent is to fly some additional segments in the country of origin be sure to return, in this example, to SFO or some other place.)
[This message has been edited by JohnAx (edited Dec 22, 2003).]
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JohnAx:
I'm not sure how clear the sum of the replies have been.
Afaik (based on several booked and completed OWE's) there is no reason to include an unused segment showing you returning to your originating city, mgm's quote of a rule notwithstanding. Your booked itin will have to show a segment that returns you, as exmo said, to the country or region from which you started. ]</font>
I'm not sure how clear the sum of the replies have been.
Afaik (based on several booked and completed OWE's) there is no reason to include an unused segment showing you returning to your originating city, mgm's quote of a rule notwithstanding. Your booked itin will have to show a segment that returns you, as exmo said, to the country or region from which you started. ]</font>
#7




Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,023
Jon - exactly right. Unless a oneworld carrier flies to somewhere else in Egypt you have no choice but to finish the journey in CAI (where you started). I think the simple version of the rule is if you start your journey in a country that is served by one or more oneworld carriers to several cities in that country then your choice of starting and ending cities can be different. But you may not start your journey in one country then finish in another, even if they are in the same region.
[This message has been edited by mgm (edited Dec 22, 2003).]
[This message has been edited by mgm (edited Dec 22, 2003).]
#8
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Boca Raton, FL DL FO/MM AA EXP SPG PLT
Posts: 968
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mgm:
But you may not start your journey in one country then finish in another, even if they are in the same region.
</font>
But you may not start your journey in one country then finish in another, even if they are in the same region.
</font>
Here is the specific rule;
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">
113N . 4. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURFACE PERMITTED:
114N . -WITHIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
115N . NOTE: U.S./CANADA ARE CONSIDERED THE SAME
116N . COUNTRY.
117N . -WITHIN AFRICA
118N . -WITHIN THE MIDDLE EAST
119N . -BETWEEN HKG-CHINA
120N . -BETWEEN BANGLADESH AND BKK/SIN
121N . -WITHIN SOUTH AMERICA
122N . -BETWEEN MAYLAYSIA AND SIN
</font>
113N . 4. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURFACE PERMITTED:
114N . -WITHIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
115N . NOTE: U.S./CANADA ARE CONSIDERED THE SAME
116N . COUNTRY.
117N . -WITHIN AFRICA
118N . -WITHIN THE MIDDLE EAST
119N . -BETWEEN HKG-CHINA
120N . -BETWEEN BANGLADESH AND BKK/SIN
121N . -WITHIN SOUTH AMERICA
122N . -BETWEEN MAYLAYSIA AND SIN
</font>
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ExMo:
This is not correct. As I noted previously, there are exceptions to the "same country" rule. While you cannot start in CAI and end in LHR you could end in DXB or TLV, as they are all classified as "Middle East"; or start in YVR and end in LAX (US/Canada exception); or start in SCL and end in EZE (South America exception).
Here is the specific rule;
This is not correct. As I noted previously, there are exceptions to the "same country" rule. While you cannot start in CAI and end in LHR you could end in DXB or TLV, as they are all classified as "Middle East"; or start in YVR and end in LAX (US/Canada exception); or start in SCL and end in EZE (South America exception).
Here is the specific rule;
113N . 4. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURFACE PERMITTED:
114N . -WITHIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
115N . NOTE: U.S./CANADA ARE CONSIDERED THE SAME
116N . COUNTRY.
117N . -WITHIN AFRICA
118N . -WITHIN THE MIDDLE EAST
119N . -BETWEEN HKG-CHINA
120N . -BETWEEN BANGLADESH AND BKK/SIN
121N . -WITHIN SOUTH AMERICA
122N . -BETWEEN MAYLAYSIA AND SIN
</font>
114N . -WITHIN COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
115N . NOTE: U.S./CANADA ARE CONSIDERED THE SAME
116N . COUNTRY.
117N . -WITHIN AFRICA
118N . -WITHIN THE MIDDLE EAST
119N . -BETWEEN HKG-CHINA
120N . -BETWEEN BANGLADESH AND BKK/SIN
121N . -WITHIN SOUTH AMERICA
122N . -BETWEEN MAYLAYSIA AND SIN
</font>
#10
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SYD
Programs: QF P1/LTG; AA 1MM; UA 1MM
Posts: 899
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JonNYC:
Ahhhhh, now I see. Boy am I glad you 'splained that to me-- I'd much rather finish the trip in DXB than CAI (unless I buy another ex-CAI ticket in the next few days.....)</font>
Ahhhhh, now I see. Boy am I glad you 'splained that to me-- I'd much rather finish the trip in DXB than CAI (unless I buy another ex-CAI ticket in the next few days.....)</font>
#11




Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,023
Whoops. I stand corrected. It's a pretty cool option for structuring an itinerary if you start in one of those regions. Annoying that the copy of the rules I have doesn't have that section at all - just what I quoted above. Out of interest where is everyone getting the latest rules from?
Hmmm - the option of starting in CAI and ending DXB is very appealing - time to try yet another itinerary variation - LOL.
Hmmm - the option of starting in CAI and ending DXB is very appealing - time to try yet another itinerary variation - LOL.
#14




Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,023
Well, I am starting to think that when I next make a booking for an owe I am going to have the reservation agent put a comments in the booking for every sector to show how it fits in with the rules. My itinerary ex CAI ending in DXB was rejected by the Dublin rate desk with a message "Must end in CAI". Oh well now the local AA office (SYD) are going to battle it out for me.
My advice is to save yourself the hassle and get the res agent to comment anything that might seem unusual.
My advice is to save yourself the hassle and get the res agent to comment anything that might seem unusual.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,729
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mgm:
Well, I am starting to think that when I next make a booking for an owe I am going to have the reservation agent put a comments in the booking for every sector to show how it fits in with the rules. My itinerary ex CAI ending in DXB was rejected by the Dublin rate desk with a message "Must end in CAI". Oh well now the local AA office (SYD) are going to battle it out for me.
My advice is to save yourself the hassle and get the res agent to comment anything that might seem unusual.
</font>
Well, I am starting to think that when I next make a booking for an owe I am going to have the reservation agent put a comments in the booking for every sector to show how it fits in with the rules. My itinerary ex CAI ending in DXB was rejected by the Dublin rate desk with a message "Must end in CAI". Oh well now the local AA office (SYD) are going to battle it out for me.
My advice is to save yourself the hassle and get the res agent to comment anything that might seem unusual.
</font>


