Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Refuelling stop = extra continent?? Dumb!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Refuelling stop = extra continent?? Dumb!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 2:13 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bahamas - Harbour Island, Miami etc
Posts: 171
Refuelling stop = extra continent?? Dumb!

Just trying to book the following:

Miami -> Los Angeles -> Sydney -> London -> New York -> Miami

I thought This would be three continents, wouldn't you?

But oh no, the plane from Sydney to London has to land to refuel in Bangkok. I'm not leaving the plane but guess what I've just added an extra continent for smelling the local air through the open door ;->

Surely AA are wrong - this is *the* dumbest rule.
julianhayward is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 2:49 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
Not wrong, not dumb. It's price control. You can also connect through Africa if you choose.
Darren is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2001 | 6:35 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,929
Sorry, but if you read the fare rules, any travel between SW Pacific and Europe and Middle East is deemed to include Asia.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2001 | 2:41 am
  #4  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Edinburgh
Programs: Lowly BA Blue. One of the original easyJet Flight Club members and still am.
Posts: 4,319
If you speak to BA they will tell you any travel involving Australia counts as 4 continents. AA are not wrong. The rule is a pain.

As Darren says you do not have to go round the world with the oneworld Explorer. I was in the BA Shop in Edinburgh on Saturday and the agent explained we could return from Oz via JNB if Africa took your fancy.

[This message has been edited by Gaza (edited 09-20-2001).]
Gaza is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2001 | 8:17 am
  #5  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
Gaza, that is what I said, but I didn't say you don't have to go around the world. You do (hence the name). Specifically, you have to have a trans-Atlantic and a trans-Pacific. So to include Australia, you can either go through Asia (example: LHR-LAX-SYD-BKK-LHR) or Africa (example: LHR-LAX-SYD-JNB-LHR). But in either case, it's four continents.
Darren is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2001 | 6:50 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 151
Yes, the current rulings stipulate that a Transatlantic AND Transpacific sector are required- in effect, you have to go all the way around the world.

However, I'm currently on a lengthy stopover in London on a OWE booked under the previous set of rules. I'm doing AFRICA-EUROPE-ASIA-AFRICA as a three continent. It's a circle trip really.
I notice now however that all African countries sell a minimum of 4 continents- thus taking into account the new rule of a mandatory transatlantic and transpacific crossing.

salt is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 2:09 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Edinburgh
Programs: Lowly BA Blue. One of the original easyJet Flight Club members and still am.
Posts: 4,319
Darren/Salt

According to BA you do not have to go around the world with a oneworld Expolorer ticket. I was infomed of this by the agent in the BA Travel Shop in Edinburgh. Not being entirely convinced by this I emailed BA and this is the response I received:-

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Oneworld Explorer fares are valid for First/Business/Economy travel on a RTW or Circle Trip basis.</font>
[This message has been edited by Gaza (edited 09-21-2001).]
Gaza is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 5:39 am
  #8  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
Go to http://fewmiles.tripod.com/oneworld/owenotes.html#1 and read lines 121 to 128. This is the Oneworld Explorer. There is also a trip called the Circle Pacific that has other rules. BA tends to lump a lot of different trips under the OWE name. In fact, I had one tell me about the new OWE with a mileage limit. He was referring of course to the global explorer.

You can go to http://fewmiles.tripod.com/oneworld/...pacific.html#1 for the circle pacific rules, or to http://fewmiles.tripod.com/oneworld/index.html#1 for a few others.
Darren is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 9:57 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-PP, HL-DM, MR-LTP, HY-LTG
Posts: 26,017
The problem is that the OneWorld Global Explorer fare is almost identical to that of a 4 Continent OneWorld Explorer fare!
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2001 | 4:02 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HK
Posts: 7
I believe whether it's compulsory to have one Trans-pacific and one Trans-Atlantic sector under the One World RTW depends on which continent you are starting from - sometimes the rules differ. The rules contained in that website above are probably the US rules. I have the Asian rules here and it says "Only 1 Transatlantic flt and 1 transpacific flt permitted when travel is via the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans" - implying that it's not necessary that one travels via either ocean. I also remember seeing a One World brochure in Bangkok one year ago showing a RTW via 3 continents - Europe, South Africa and Asia.
brians is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2001 | 6:39 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-PP, HL-DM, MR-LTP, HY-LTG
Posts: 26,017
Yes - you may travel in a circle route without going transpacific or transatlantic!

Say originating from HKG - HKG-NRT-SYD-JNB-CPT-LHR-SIN-BKK-HKG.
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2001 | 10:17 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brasil and Hong Kong
Posts: 894
Ok, I can see a specific rule on travel between Australia and Europe:

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">
5. TRAVEL BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND EUROPE
ON A SINGLE FLIGHT NUMBER IS CONSIDERED
TRAVEL THROUGH 3 CONTINENTS.
SW PACIFIC-ASIA-EUROPE
</font>
But how about transit between South America and Asia? Is it considered travel through 3 continents? S AMERICA-N AMERICA-ASIA?
Toxa is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2001 | 12:46 am
  #13  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
Or South America-Southwest Pacific-Asia
Darren is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2001 | 1:35 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brasil and Hong Kong
Posts: 894
I mean transit without stopover, still 3 continent? While there is a specific rule for between Australia and Europe, there is no mention for between South America and Asia. There is no mention even for between New Zealand and Europe!
Toxa is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2001 | 8:33 am
  #15  
In memoriam
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,173

Toxa,

If you can find a 1 flight number plane between New Zealand and Europe or between South America and Asia then the rules would not count the intermediate refueling stop as a continent. However, as far as I am aware, no such single flight exists. Therefore the intermediate change of planes would count as a continent whether you transit or stop.

rich

RichLond is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.