Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Is this the longest rtw allowed?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is this the longest rtw allowed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 8:20 am
  #16  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,521
Originally Posted by pandaperth
I'm not sure what point gardyloo is making with regard to transiting Asia twice..
I'm still hampered by the old (pre-online booking) interpretation of the Asia transit rule, i.e. it was only allowed when going from Europe to SWP or vice versa, not SWP to North America or v.v. The original idea was that it was allowed since there was no nonstop Europe - SWP service, while there obviously is between SWP and North America.

Originally Posted by wingzing
I had a similar itinerary. CX would not allow the last transit through HKG. AA permitted it. I did some dummy bookings and the online tool was OK with it.
Sounds like CX is also of the old opinion. Mind you, I'm personally cool with it.

Originally Posted by qsh
http://www.gcmap.com/map?P=c:%23abcd...%23ee82ee&PW=2

hkg-bkk-cmb-nrt-cmb-pvg-syd-dxb-lon-cpt-doh-lax-mbj-lax-gru-asu-bog-asu-gru-jfk-yvr-hkg
80230mi

(though only 78,941 mi if direct flights are calculated based on direct distance...)
Too many Asia segments, plus (and again this may be old interpretation) the second North America transit (GRU-xJFK-xYVR-HKG) can't have more than one connection point. GRU-xJFK-HKG would be okay if the JFK connection is less than 24h. Does LAX-MBJ-LAX even exist?
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 10:57 am
  #17  
qsh
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: YKZ
Programs: AS MVP BR *G
Posts: 159
Yes JFK stop has to be less then 24hours.
And LAX-MBJ-LAX actually exist. Once weekly AA2599/8 red eye from LAX on Friday and return on Saturday. Unfortunately AA doesn't fly to PTY from LAX, that would add quite a lot of distance.
qsh is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 6:18 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QRPC PLT/OW EMD; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 14,571
Originally Posted by qsh
hkg-bkk-cmb-nrt-cmb-pvg-syd-dxb-lon-cpt-doh-lax-mbj-lax-gru-asu-bog-asu-gru-jfk-yvr-hkg
Wouldn't you do better with a JFK-HKG nonstop and use the extra segment somewhere else?
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 7:47 pm
  #19  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
I'm still hampered by the old (pre-online booking) interpretation of the Asia transit rule, i.e. it was only allowed when going from Europe to SWP or vice versa, not SWP to North America or v.v. The original idea was that it was allowed since there was no nonstop Europe - SWP service, while there obviously is between SWP and North America.

Sounds like CX is also of the old opinion. Mind you, I'm personally cool with it.
On xONEx I've flown via Asia between SWP and North America, with separate Asia entry between Europe and SWP, many times over the years. Most recently was over a year ago, so it may have changed since I last did it.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 7:49 pm
  #20  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Wouldn't you do better with a JFK-HKG nonstop and use the extra segment somewhere else?
qsh has listed every flown sector, but would only be able to do this by booking as JFK-HKG (and similarly for the other multi-sector flights).
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2016 | 8:08 am
  #21  
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: used to be PER, now it's nowhere/eveywhere
Programs: QFF NB, AA GLD
Posts: 3,687
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
I'm still hampered by the old (pre-online booking) interpretation of the Asia transit rule, i.e. it was only allowed when going from Europe to SWP or vice versa, not SWP to North America or v.v. The original idea was that it was allowed since there was no nonstop Europe - SWP service, while there obviously is between SWP and North America.

Sounds like CX is also of the old opinion. Mind you, I'm personally cool with it.
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
On xONEx I've flown via Asia between SWP and North America, with separate Asia entry between Europe and SWP, many times over the years. Most recently was over a year ago, so it may have changed since I last did it.
I have also had a second visit to Asia as a transit between Nth America and SWP (it was YVR-xHKG-PER) - purchased from AA

And just last July I purchased, again from AA, a ticket with a second visit to Asia - this time it is PER-xHGK-DFW

So it does seem that CX is misinterpreting the rule (which IIRC was a fairly common occurrence prior to the on-line booking tool becoming available)

I suggest the OP go back to CX pointing out that other airlines (specifically AA) AND the on-line tool interpret the rule to be:
Two permitted in Asia when
- one is a transfer without stopover or
- on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe/Middle East.
With the first dot point having nothing to do with SWP-Europe/Middle East
(the on-line tool allows both Nth America-xAsia-SWP and Africa-xAsia-SWP)

Last edited by pandaperth; Oct 23, 2016 at 8:34 am
pandaperth is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2016 | 5:47 pm
  #22  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Programs: A3 *G, AA exePlat, AS MVP 75k Gold, JL sapphire, UA silver
Posts: 4,790
never mind
pbd456 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.