Could HU still join OW?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: London
Programs: A3 Gold | OZ Gold | BD RIP // BA Silver | QR Silver // AF Ivory | KE Skypass
Posts: 19
Could HU still join OW?
I know people have spoken about this before - but I don't think recently. Back in 2010(ish) - it seemed like Hainan was pretty sure to join; they were actively looking to join an alliance, and were (and still are) the last major unaligned airline in mainland China - where OW currently has no members.
I would love to see HU join, and as far as I can see, they would be (almost) perfect for OW:
Obviously, Chinese airlines are in a mess when it comes to alliances (with MU having joined ST, and CX and CA's partnership) - and because of the HNA group's involvement with HK Airlines and HK express, Cathay certainly would not be pleased if HU were to join OW. However, Cathay doesn't really cover mainland China in the way that Hainan does.
Is there a chance of HU joining OW? - to me it seems quite logical (or maybe I'm not thinking straight because I just really want them to join?). I'd be interested to know what people think!
I would love to see HU join, and as far as I can see, they would be (almost) perfect for OW:
- They codeshare with AA, AB, and S7 (and previously QF and JL; they also have an interlining agreement with BA) - covering a lot of their (extremely limited) long haul network
- They have an extensive domestic network in China - which is what OW really needs imo - this would allow OW passengers to transfer between HU-operated dom. flights and OW-operated intl. flights at several major hubs in mainland China
- They offer a good product (especially when compared against other Chinese carriers) - and are a 5* airline
Obviously, Chinese airlines are in a mess when it comes to alliances (with MU having joined ST, and CX and CA's partnership) - and because of the HNA group's involvement with HK Airlines and HK express, Cathay certainly would not be pleased if HU were to join OW. However, Cathay doesn't really cover mainland China in the way that Hainan does.
Is there a chance of HU joining OW? - to me it seems quite logical (or maybe I'm not thinking straight because I just really want them to join?). I'd be interested to know what people think!
Last edited by jbwe350; May 11, 2014 at 3:49 pm
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Juneau, Alaska.
Programs: AS 75K;BA Silver;AA G;HH Dia;HY Glob
Posts: 16,679
As you noted people have speculated about this before. See the discussions in this thread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...l?highlight=hu
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...l?highlight=hu
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Could HU still join OW?
It does not sound logical, IMHO.
HU has a significant interest at HX, which is CX's competitor in HKG. Regardless on how the competition is, if HU join OW, it will make the relationship awkward.
Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue.
HU has a significant interest at HX, which is CX's competitor in HKG. Regardless on how the competition is, if HU join OW, it will make the relationship awkward.
Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
It is more easier and less tiresome shopping around for the best alternative, price and itinerary wise rather than locking yourself in an allianced carrier. Besides, for the majority of the flights for a given carrier in a given alliance you most likely won't receive miles or a minimum amount After running around China for twenty years i have yet to meet someone getting status in alliances mainly through domestic flying, and if one's really want to he will quickly discover all the nonsense about China as a cheaper place to live and work . OW at the moment is well covered in the main regional areas the same as the other two alliances, so i do not see many advantages in inducing a local entrant, esxcept getting into some third-and-lower tier cities.
#6
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX (elite) and a few others (non-elite)
Posts: 687
HU has a significant interest at HX, which is CX's competitor in HKG. Regardless on how the competition is, if HU join OW, it will make the relationship awkward.
Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue.
Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue.
As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
#8
formerly gemini573




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX, HKG, and BKK
Programs: CX Emerald, WOH Globalist, Marriott Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, Virtuoso, Prive, STEPS, STARS
Posts: 2,233
I don't think HX is much of a direct competitor to CX/KA - it is much more of an LCC - and, I might add, therefore somewhat at odds with oneworld's aim to be the premier alliance for people travelling on business (note - "on", not "in")
As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing.
As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing.
#9


Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: MR Gold, Hilton Diamond, Mlia Platinum, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 1,197
OW certainly lacks a partner in Asia. Even if JAL and CX are in OW I feel they're not covering the area as good as Star and Skyteam are doing.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners.
I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners.
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners.
I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners.
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
#10
formerly gemini573




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX, HKG, and BKK
Programs: CX Emerald, WOH Globalist, Marriott Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, Virtuoso, Prive, STEPS, STARS
Posts: 2,233
OW certainly lacks a partner in Asia. Even if JAL and CX are in OW I feel they're not covering the area as good as Star and Skyteam are doing.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners.
I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners.
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners.
I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners.
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
You look at AAdvantage. They are giving miles out like it's going out of fashion. It's good but look at the consequences. For example, you were able to get a seat for 55k in J class on a DFW-HKG flight. Now, if you want to be guaranteed a seat, it will cost you in excess of 170k and that's oneway!
You look at JL's program. It's VERY VERY HARD to earn miles on cheap fare tickets.
#11


Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: MR Gold, Hilton Diamond, Mlia Platinum, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 1,197
As far as the miles go, it depends. LA, RJ, AY, UL, you're able to earn miles on a lot of fare codes banking it on MPC.
You look at AAdvantage. They are giving miles out like it's going out of fashion. It's good but look at the consequences. For example, you were able to get a seat for 55k in J class on a DFW-HKG flight. Now, if you want to be guaranteed a seat, it will cost you in excess of 170k and that's oneway!
You look at JL's program. It's VERY VERY HARD to earn miles on cheap fare tickets.
You look at AAdvantage. They are giving miles out like it's going out of fashion. It's good but look at the consequences. For example, you were able to get a seat for 55k in J class on a DFW-HKG flight. Now, if you want to be guaranteed a seat, it will cost you in excess of 170k and that's oneway!
You look at JL's program. It's VERY VERY HARD to earn miles on cheap fare tickets.
Regarding JAL. Had a look at their program. Indeed lowest level 30% miles. Comes close to big EU programs like Flying Blue and M&M where deep discount economy earns 25% miles. Peanuts. You would excpect higher rates of success when booking awards but this is not true either. (at least not for flying blue).
JAL is stingy on miles for both it's own members and partners. (I compared with AA, earnings are same for JAL & AA members). CX's earning levels are higher for their own members than they're for partners.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
AB & BA not much better.
AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles.
But 0% is something not often seen in OW...
This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance.
1>, Almost all CX's north American routes can be booked under AA code. So AA flyers can earn AA miles and EQMs when fly CX
2>, BA and AB flyers may only earn 25% of mileage when fly CX. BA members have a great advantage. BA members can earn miles and Tier Points on every revenue class ticket of CX, which members from CX can even not earn anything from! That includes OQSN four subclass. CX changed rules a little bit this year so its member can earn few miles.
There is no perfect mileage programme. Airlines have to keep some reserves to encourage its own members to fly its own metal. As a customer, you certainly have a choice to choose the programme suites you best.
#13
formerly gemini573




Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LAX, HKG, and BKK
Programs: CX Emerald, WOH Globalist, Marriott Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, Virtuoso, Prive, STEPS, STARS
Posts: 2,233
The MPC program is indeed more generous. AY is very generous to it's partners, they also offer 100% miles for all travel on AA. Of course, this way around, it's LA, RJ, AY, UL, .. in this case that need to buy the miles from MPC. So it doesn't cost a dime for CX.
Regarding JAL. Had a look at their program. Indeed lowest level 30% miles. Comes close to big EU programs like Flying Blue and M&M where deep discount economy earns 25% miles. Peanuts. You would excpect higher rates of success when booking awards but this is not true either. (at least not for flying blue).
JAL is stingy on miles for both it's own members and partners. (I compared with AA, earnings are same for JAL & AA members). CX's earning levels are higher for their own members than they're for partners.
Regarding JAL. Had a look at their program. Indeed lowest level 30% miles. Comes close to big EU programs like Flying Blue and M&M where deep discount economy earns 25% miles. Peanuts. You would excpect higher rates of success when booking awards but this is not true either. (at least not for flying blue).
JAL is stingy on miles for both it's own members and partners. (I compared with AA, earnings are same for JAL & AA members). CX's earning levels are higher for their own members than they're for partners.
Now, going back to whether or not HU will join ow? As long as CX is in ow, I think it will be very difficult for HU to join. PRC will always be the weak link in OW. Yes, KA flies to quite a few destinations in PRC, but it's the domestic portion that's lacking.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
HX is a HU affiliate. So by joining OW, HU will create a love-hate relationship:
HU-CX (Love - strategic partners under OW); HX-CX (Hate - competitors)
So to HU, what is more important, OW or HX?
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HKG, VCE, CAN
Programs: CX MPO
Posts: 585
Going to fly business in domestic routes is no proposition for my employer because of the far cheaper price of the economy class and now the chance to take HST. Many others are in my situation as well, guess this is the price one has to pay to the bs mantra of China as a cheap place and as "huge" market.

