![]() |
Could HU still join OW?
I know people have spoken about this before - but I don't think recently. Back in 2010(ish) - it seemed like Hainan was pretty sure to join; they were actively looking to join an alliance, and were (and still are) the last major unaligned airline in mainland China - where OW currently has no members.
I would love to see HU join, and as far as I can see, they would be (almost) perfect for OW:
Obviously, Chinese airlines are in a mess when it comes to alliances (with MU having joined ST, and CX and CA's partnership) - and because of the HNA group's involvement with HK Airlines and HK express, Cathay certainly would not be pleased if HU were to join OW. However, Cathay doesn't really cover mainland China in the way that Hainan does. Is there a chance of HU joining OW? - to me it seems quite logical (or maybe I'm not thinking straight because I just really want them to join?). I'd be interested to know what people think! :) |
Could HU still join OW?
CX doesn't cover mainland, but Dragon Air does.
|
As you noted people have speculated about this before. See the discussions in this thread:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...l?highlight=hu |
Could HU still join OW?
It does not sound logical, IMHO.
HU has a significant interest at HX, which is CX's competitor in HKG. Regardless on how the competition is, if HU join OW, it will make the relationship awkward. Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue. |
Originally Posted by jbwe350
(Post 22846827)
[*]They have an extensive domestic network in China - which is what OW really needs imo - this would allow OW passengers to transfer between HU-operated dom. flights and OW-operated intl. flights at several major hubs in mainland China
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 22848683)
HU has a significant interest at HX, which is CX's competitor in HKG. Regardless on how the competition is, if HU join OW, it will make the relationship awkward.
Also as many CX's traffic are from the Mainland, a OW partner in the Mainland will definitely impact CX revenue. As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing. |
Originally Posted by CXBA
(Post 22848711)
Besides, for the majority of the flights for a given carrier in a given alliance you most likely won't receive miles or a minimum amount After running around China for twenty years i have yet to meet someone getting status in alliances mainly through domestic flying
|
Originally Posted by IanFromHKG
(Post 22855006)
I don't think HX is much of a direct competitor to CX/KA - it is much more of an LCC - and, I might add, therefore somewhat at odds with oneworld's aim to be the premier alliance for people travelling on business (note - "on", not "in")
As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing. |
OW certainly lacks a partner in Asia. Even if JAL and CX are in OW I feel they're not covering the area as good as Star and Skyteam are doing.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners. I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners. AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel AB & BA not much better. AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles. But 0% is something not often seen in OW... This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance. |
Originally Posted by kcaluwae
(Post 22864662)
OW certainly lacks a partner in Asia. Even if JAL and CX are in OW I feel they're not covering the area as good as Star and Skyteam are doing.
Based on this thread and other threads it always comes down to CX who is assumed to be blocking potential new partners. I don't understand how this fits with the fact that CX is offering peanuts instead of miles to OW partners. AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel AB & BA not much better. AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles. But 0% is something not often seen in OW... This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance. You look at AAdvantage. They are giving miles out like it's going out of fashion. It's good but look at the consequences. For example, you were able to get a seat for 55k in J class on a DFW-HKG flight. Now, if you want to be guaranteed a seat, it will cost you in excess of 170k and that's oneway! You look at JL's program. It's VERY VERY HARD to earn miles on cheap fare tickets. |
Originally Posted by gemini573
(Post 22865463)
As far as the miles go, it depends. LA, RJ, AY, UL, you're able to earn miles on a lot of fare codes banking it on MPC.
You look at AAdvantage. They are giving miles out like it's going out of fashion. It's good but look at the consequences. For example, you were able to get a seat for 55k in J class on a DFW-HKG flight. Now, if you want to be guaranteed a seat, it will cost you in excess of 170k and that's oneway! You look at JL's program. It's VERY VERY HARD to earn miles on cheap fare tickets. Regarding JAL. Had a look at their program. Indeed lowest level 30% miles. Comes close to big EU programs like Flying Blue and M&M where deep discount economy earns 25% miles. Peanuts. You would excpect higher rates of success when booking awards but this is not true either. (at least not for flying blue). JAL is stingy on miles for both it's own members and partners. (I compared with AA, earnings are same for JAL & AA members). CX's earning levels are higher for their own members than they're for partners. |
Originally Posted by kcaluwae
(Post 22864662)
AA : 0% miles for all not full fare economy travel
AB & BA not much better. AY seems to be the exception with at least 50% miles. But 0% is something not often seen in OW... This indicated CX's attitude is they don't need OW to drive traffic and CX is able to handle competition in Asia without the need of an alliance. 1>, Almost all CX's north American routes can be booked under AA code. So AA flyers can earn AA miles and EQMs when fly CX 2>, BA and AB flyers may only earn 25% of mileage when fly CX. BA members have a great advantage. BA members can earn miles and Tier Points on every revenue class ticket of CX, which members from CX can even not earn anything from! That includes OQSN four subclass. CX changed rules a little bit this year so its member can earn few miles. There is no perfect mileage programme. Airlines have to keep some reserves to encourage its own members to fly its own metal. As a customer, you certainly have a choice to choose the programme suites you best. |
Originally Posted by kcaluwae
(Post 22869476)
The MPC program is indeed more generous. AY is very generous to it's partners, they also offer 100% miles for all travel on AA. Of course, this way around, it's LA, RJ, AY, UL, .. in this case that need to buy the miles from MPC. So it doesn't cost a dime for CX.
Regarding JAL. Had a look at their program. Indeed lowest level 30% miles. Comes close to big EU programs like Flying Blue and M&M where deep discount economy earns 25% miles. Peanuts. You would excpect higher rates of success when booking awards but this is not true either. (at least not for flying blue). JAL is stingy on miles for both it's own members and partners. (I compared with AA, earnings are same for JAL & AA members). CX's earning levels are higher for their own members than they're for partners. Now, going back to whether or not HU will join ow? As long as CX is in ow, I think it will be very difficult for HU to join. PRC will always be the weak link in OW. Yes, KA flies to quite a few destinations in PRC, but it's the domestic portion that's lacking. |
Originally Posted by IanFromHKG
(Post 22855006)
I don't think HX is much of a direct competitor to CX/KA - it is much more of an LCC - and, I might add, therefore somewhat at odds with oneworld's aim to be the premier alliance for people travelling on business (note - "on", not "in")
Originally Posted by IanFromHKG
(Post 22855006)
As to making the relationship awkward, or impacting revenue - I am not so sure. After all, the entry of QR into OW potentially threatened the incumbents' Europe-Asia traffic, yet BA sponsored their entry and CX immediately set up extensive code-sharing.
HX is a HU affiliate. So by joining OW, HU will create a love-hate relationship: HU-CX (Love - strategic partners under OW); HX-CX (Hate - competitors) So to HU, what is more important, OW or HX? |
Originally Posted by chongcao
(Post 22861828)
Just a quick fact, many Elites in Air China and China Southern are flying domestic solely. They fly on a daily basis on business. ;)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:36 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.