![]() |
Originally Posted by NA-Flyer
(Post 18078320)
I feel that EY will be invited soon to join OW.
|
Originally Posted by NA-Flyer
(Post 18078320)
I feel that EY will be invited soon to join OW.
It is the obvious move of OW members to combat EK crazy expansion every where.
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 18078664)
How so? If it were to happen, it would be either AA or BA sponsoring them into the alliance. I don't think it is as likely as it could have been as they swapped Australian partners from QF to DJ/VA.
I really don't know which one it will join, but seeing its large stake in airberlin, it seems a bit towards the OW side, but things can change. |
Originally Posted by og
(Post 18043097)
Originally Posted by mzkaiser
(Post 18040842)
The last time I flushed a toilet on BA it made a unique sound. That signaled BA's downfall, and the end of OneWorld as a whole. :p
;) |
Originally Posted by onobond
(Post 18085769)
Sure, but all of us taking a shower in BA LHR T5 F Lounge has heard worse sucking sounds, for years. Maybe that's BD beeing sucked into IAG?
;) |
Originally Posted by millsdale
(Post 18065531)
QF I am a bit worried about, I think jetstar is taking over too much.
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 18072751)
Jetstar Scandinavia? :p
|
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
(Post 18088293)
Can't see a budget airline being based in countries with such high labour/operating costs.
|
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
(Post 18088293)
Can't see a budget airline being based in countries with such high labour/operating costs.
|
Originally Posted by Blackcloud
(Post 18093060)
Probably would try to wrangle an arrangement using lower cost Eatern European (there are some left) labour!:eek:
|
Originally Posted by razMJ
(Post 18098953)
Like Ryanair eh?
Pilots of course will come from low houred pilots with shiny jet syndrome that will be a pilot on a graduates starting wage just to fly in the silver jets.:p |
Originally Posted by Catweazle
(Post 18067329)
What I've always wondered about is how QFFs can earn points on China Eastern, when MU is with SkyTeam. No SCs, but not a bad start, millsdale!
Originally Posted by 123dd
(Post 18071947)
MU and QF worked together long before MU joined ST.... It was more Chinese politics than airline decision.. Maybe MU want to be in the same alliance as CZ to compete with CA ad its subsidiaries...
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 18072010)
Or perhaps the CEO's personal preference...
|
Originally Posted by Yaatri
(Post 18120918)
As 123dd stated, agreements signed before an airline jojns an alliance do not suddenly disappear.
|
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
(Post 18124031)
MH seems to be going the other direction though, with their agreements with other airlines like Virgin Australia disappearing even before being admitted to the alliance.
|
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
(Post 18124031)
MH seems to be going the other direction though, with their agreements with other airlines like Virgin Australia disappearing even before being admitted to the alliance.
|
From a Star Alliance customer perspective, One World does seem to have lost their competitive advantage - there are just so many more partners in Star.
From a leisure traveller perspective, there is little incentive to want to switch or ride One World metal when Star will take you there, and get points. Perhaps if I was in SYD or HKG or LHR, and One World was my only choice, then it would make more sense to be a part of their program, but it seems that the amount of metal available from Vancouver doesn't really suit my needs. |
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 18054328)
Again, why would CX want to leave Oneworld?
|
Originally Posted by marcusnugg
(Post 18158334)
I don't think CX is going to leave oneworld. CX is very committed to the alliance. Maybe because it doesn't make sense to ditch something they helped to create!
|
Originally Posted by worldtraveller73
(Post 18138386)
From a Star Alliance customer perspective, One World does seem to have lost their competitive advantage - there are just so many more partners in Star.
Would they had was general strength of quality airlines with good lounges |
OW 2 Thumbs down!
|
Originally Posted by moa999
(Post 18171294)
oneworld always suffered from less partners.
Would they had was general strength of quality airlines with good lounges |
Originally Posted by onobond
(Post 18184400)
The span in quality is higher in *A than in OW, IMO
*A is becoming the alliance, if not already is. Of course it helps when you have hundereds of airlines:p Yes that is an exageration but I remember some *A liveries where the fuselage was painted in colours of member airlines....an A340-600 would struggle to have this scheme now. |
Originally Posted by Blackcloud
(Post 18186395)
I would agree with this now but not 10 years ago.
*A is becoming the alliance, if not already is. Of course it helps when you have hundereds of airlines:p Yes that is an exageration but I remember some *A liveries where the fuselage was painted in colours of member airlines....an A340-600 would struggle to have this scheme now. |
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 18189340)
*A has too many members that they can't work well together. It might as well be UA, LH and SQ while the other airlines do what they're told.
Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY? |
Originally Posted by rurouni212
(Post 18169337)
Agreed. Although the Air China joint ownership thing certainly makes things interesting, the only way I could see CX leaving oneworld is if the alliance was on the verge of collapse (which it is not).
- Replace NH with JL on Japan-China flights - QF can replace MU with CA on Australian flights - Qantas can fly to Shanghai, and Air China for Beijing flights. QF and CA codeshared on the PEK-SYD route at one stage. - Partner with AA on the US flights. Whereas CX on the other hand, has a huge rival in * in SQ. Plus it codeshares heavily with AA even to South America, BA in inter-Europe, JL on flights to Japan amongst others. I think we might see HU/HX join oneworld (providing a mini HKG base to star), and CA come to oneworld longer term. To me it seems logical, feel free to disagree. |
Originally Posted by razMJ
(Post 18238137)
I agree
Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...land-says.html http://www.telegraaf.nl/dft/nieuws_d..._France__.html "Airberlin has accepted the invitation of Air France KLM to talk about a strategic cooperation." |
Originally Posted by razMJ
(Post 18238137)
I agree
Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY? :) |
Originally Posted by Platinum A332
(Post 18242516)
What are the chances of CA joining oneworld? It does not seem that they are heavily in a partnership with any of the Star Alliance , and where they are they can be easily replaced. In fact their most extensive partnership is with CX and KA, both oneworld members.
- Replace NH with JL on Japan-China flights - QF can replace MU with CA on Australian flights - Qantas can fly to Shanghai, and Air China for Beijing flights. QF and CA codeshared on the PEK-SYD route at one stage. - Partner with AA on the US flights. Whereas CX on the other hand, has a huge rival in * in SQ. Plus it codeshares heavily with AA even to South America, BA in inter-Europe, JL on flights to Japan amongst others. I think we might see HU/HX join oneworld (providing a mini HKG base to star), and CA come to oneworld longer term. To me it seems logical, feel free to disagree. |
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 18032201)
QF and CX not working well together isn't because QF doesn't want to, its CX being CX.
Cutting to the chase, he recently told me that QF's recent attempt to partner with HNA really pissed off CX. In spite of the fact that his current employer is a member of one of the alliances that has solid intra-China connectivity, he fully respects CX's desire to be OW's link to China. Separately, I've been working on a project with HNA for the past year, and have learned a lot about the company in the process. Those guys have a ton of money, and seem quite happy doing things their own way... almost cowboy style (e.g. buy a hotel in some far flung city, start flying there, and hope for the best). While kissing up to CX isn't beyond the realm of possibility, this idea doesn't gel with what I understand about their corporate culture; e.g. they are immensely proud of their new HKG-LHR flight. |
Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...
http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me ;) :D |
Originally Posted by Aisle Seat H
(Post 18268781)
Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...
http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me ;) :D |
Here's to a crazy idea, but since QF doesn't get on with CX, and now doesn't get on with MH either, perhaps QF should leave OW, and join ST. Virgin is somewhat aligned with *A, and with SQ obviously being in *A, that's not really an option.
But if QF does join ST, they would have instantly created a network in China, via MU in Shanghai, and to a lesser degree CZ which flies to major AU cities already. The link to Japan is lost, but with non-stop flights from eastern AU to the US, I don't see it as a big loss. However, they gain VN's network, and further collaboration in that area would also help with Jetstar's somewhat haphazard relationship in that country. And then, there's Garuda... but I can't see them being too happy about letting QF in. :) QF also already codeshare with AF to France, and its frequent flyer program also earns points on AZ. But apart from this, the network does have a pretty big hole in Europe. Having said that though, given QF's recent strategic shift in focusing in Asia and regional flights rather than the ultra-long-haul segments to Europe, moving to ST actually sounds like a good strategic fit. EDIT: Adding to the above, I've just been made aware that Jetstar Hong Kong is launching as a joint venture with MU. As silly and embarrassing it is for a OW founding member to defect, it does sound like it might just work out... (although I might not say the same after I recover from my red-eye flight). |
Originally Posted by Awesom Andy
(Post 18271836)
EDIT: Adding to the above, I've just been made aware that Jetstar Hong Kong is launching as a joint venture with MU. As silly and embarrassing it is for a OW founding member to defect, it does sound like it might just work out... (although I might not say the same after I recover from my red-eye flight). |
CX should just partner up with Virgin Australia to piss QF off.
|
Originally Posted by Platinum A332
(Post 18274324)
CX should just partner up with Virgin Australia to piss QF off.
|
Originally Posted by rurouni212
(Post 18269763)
Originally Posted by Aisle Seat H
(Post 18268781)
Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...
http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me ;) :D Did I hear EY???:confused: :cool: |
Originally Posted by onobond
(Post 18275728)
Yeah, THREE new then, and MH warming up before autumn entrance...
Did I hear EY???:confused: :cool: |
Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!
|
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 18631850)
Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!
|
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
(Post 18631850)
Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!
So, next time you really really wish them down the drain, try a different tactic, shower them with abundant praise! :D |
Originally Posted by CXBA
(Post 18633602)
you guys have piled on an astounding quantity of death wishes for Kingfisher the past months. You know, maybe you've just given them additional support and help them actually slowly come over their predicament :cool:
So, next time you really really wish them down the drain, try a different tactic, shower them with abundant praise! :D |
How could anybody think that Kingfisher is going bankrupt! They will be here forever, the most profitable company in the world!
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.