FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   oneworld (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld-411/)
-   -   Is oneworld alliance going to die!!! (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/oneworld/1315159-oneworld-alliance-going-die.html)

Himeno Feb 25, 2012 3:32 am


Originally Posted by NA-Flyer (Post 18078320)
I feel that EY will be invited soon to join OW.

How so? If it were to happen, it would be either AA or BA sponsoring them into the alliance. I don't think it is as likely as it could have been as they swapped Australian partners from QF to DJ/VA.

razMJ Feb 25, 2012 4:39 am


Originally Posted by NA-Flyer (Post 18078320)
I feel that EY will be invited soon to join OW.

It is the obvious move of OW members to combat EK crazy expansion every where.


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 18078664)
How so? If it were to happen, it would be either AA or BA sponsoring them into the alliance. I don't think it is as likely as it could have been as they swapped Australian partners from QF to DJ/VA.

It is obvious that OW will invite EY, but the question is whether EY will choose to join OW or not.EY, unlike EK, claim to be looking to join an alliance, and that it would probably either be OW or *A. It has partner airberlin in OW, and Virgin Australia, opposed to both BA and QF and allied with SQ, a *A member. It does have other partnerships with OW members and *A members, but most of those are less important.
I really don't know which one it will join, but seeing its large stake in airberlin, it seems a bit towards the OW side, but things can change.

onobond Feb 26, 2012 1:47 pm


Originally Posted by og (Post 18043097)


Originally Posted by mzkaiser (Post 18040842)
The last time I flushed a toilet on BA it made a unique sound. That signaled BA's downfall, and the end of OneWorld as a whole. :p

That sound really sucks ... :D

Sure, but all of us taking a shower in BA LHR T5 F Lounge has heard worse sucking sounds, for years. Maybe that's BD beeing sucked into IAG?
;)

razMJ Feb 26, 2012 2:18 pm


Originally Posted by onobond (Post 18085769)
Sure, but all of us taking a shower in BA LHR T5 F Lounge has heard worse sucking sounds, for years. Maybe that's BD beeing sucked into IAG?
;)

:D

Awesom Andy Feb 27, 2012 12:43 am


Originally Posted by millsdale (Post 18065531)
QF I am a bit worried about, I think jetstar is taking over too much.

Thought I might mention that, at the NATAS fair (largest travel show in SIN), QF didn't bother with their share of the stall, handing it all to BA. Jetstar also made a presence (with a few of the "business" class seats which looked downright horrible at their stall). It looks like QF is all but exiting the Asia region, if you ask me. :eek:


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 18072751)
Jetstar Scandinavia? :p

Can't see a budget airline being based in countries with such high labour/operating costs.

moa999 Feb 27, 2012 1:16 am


Originally Posted by Awesom Andy (Post 18088293)
Can't see a budget airline being based in countries with such high labour/operating costs.

Like say Australia

Blackcloud Feb 27, 2012 5:31 pm


Originally Posted by Awesom Andy (Post 18088293)
Can't see a budget airline being based in countries with such high labour/operating costs.

Probably would try to wrangle an arrangement using lower cost Eatern European (there are some left) labour!:eek:

razMJ Feb 28, 2012 2:51 pm


Originally Posted by Blackcloud (Post 18093060)
Probably would try to wrangle an arrangement using lower cost Eatern European (there are some left) labour!:eek:

Like Ryanair eh?

Blackcloud Feb 28, 2012 8:51 pm


Originally Posted by razMJ (Post 18098953)
Like Ryanair eh?

Well I had to model my answer after a factual airline.;)
Pilots of course will come from low houred pilots with shiny jet syndrome that will be a pilot on a graduates starting wage just to fly in the silver jets.:p

Yaatri Mar 2, 2012 4:21 pm


Originally Posted by Catweazle (Post 18067329)
What I've always wondered about is how QFFs can earn points on China Eastern, when MU is with SkyTeam. No SCs, but not a bad start, millsdale!


Originally Posted by 123dd (Post 18071947)
MU and QF worked together long before MU joined ST.... It was more Chinese politics than airline decision.. Maybe MU want to be in the same alliance as CZ to compete with CA ad its subsidiaries...


Originally Posted by ernestnywang (Post 18072010)
Or perhaps the CEO's personal preference...

As 123dd stated, agreements signed before an airline jojns an alliance do not suddenly disappear. There are many many examples of this. SKymiles flyers could redeem award on SQ even after SQ decided to join *Alliance. Delta flyers can still redeem their miles on Jet and Kingfisher.

Awesom Andy Mar 3, 2012 6:29 am


Originally Posted by Yaatri (Post 18120918)
As 123dd stated, agreements signed before an airline jojns an alliance do not suddenly disappear.

MH seems to be going the other direction though, with their agreements with other airlines like Virgin Australia disappearing even before being admitted to the alliance.

Himeno Mar 3, 2012 9:41 am


Originally Posted by Awesom Andy (Post 18124031)
MH seems to be going the other direction though, with their agreements with other airlines like Virgin Australia disappearing even before being admitted to the alliance.

Which agreements? I doubt they are dropping all agreements with non oneworld members, just those that would conflict with another oneworld member (such as NH vs JL and DJ/VA vs QF).

ernestnywang Mar 3, 2012 11:02 am


Originally Posted by Awesom Andy (Post 18124031)
MH seems to be going the other direction though, with their agreements with other airlines like Virgin Australia disappearing even before being admitted to the alliance.

With QF being MH's sponsor, this should come quickly.

worldtraveller73 Mar 5, 2012 10:40 am

From a Star Alliance customer perspective, One World does seem to have lost their competitive advantage - there are just so many more partners in Star.

From a leisure traveller perspective, there is little incentive to want to switch or ride One World metal when Star will take you there, and get points.

Perhaps if I was in SYD or HKG or LHR, and One World was my only choice, then it would make more sense to be a part of their program, but it seems that the amount of metal available from Vancouver doesn't really suit my needs.

marcusnugg Mar 8, 2012 1:32 am


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 18054328)
Again, why would CX want to leave Oneworld?

I don't think CX is going to leave oneworld. CX is very committed to the alliance. Maybe because it doesn't make sense to ditch something they helped to create!

rurouni212 Mar 9, 2012 3:08 pm


Originally Posted by marcusnugg (Post 18158334)
I don't think CX is going to leave oneworld. CX is very committed to the alliance. Maybe because it doesn't make sense to ditch something they helped to create!

Agreed. Although the Air China joint ownership thing certainly makes things interesting, the only way I could see CX leaving oneworld is if the alliance was on the verge of collapse (which it is not).

moa999 Mar 9, 2012 10:30 pm


Originally Posted by worldtraveller73 (Post 18138386)
From a Star Alliance customer perspective, One World does seem to have lost their competitive advantage - there are just so many more partners in Star.

oneworld always suffered from less partners.
Would they had was general strength of quality airlines with good lounges

dimmedlights Mar 11, 2012 6:03 pm

OW 2 Thumbs down!

onobond Mar 12, 2012 10:03 am


Originally Posted by moa999 (Post 18171294)
oneworld always suffered from less partners.
Would they had was general strength of quality airlines with good lounges

The span in quality is higher in *A than in OW, IMO

Blackcloud Mar 12, 2012 2:33 pm


Originally Posted by onobond (Post 18184400)
The span in quality is higher in *A than in OW, IMO

I would agree with this now but not 10 years ago.
*A is becoming the alliance, if not already is. Of course it helps when you have hundereds of airlines:p Yes that is an exageration but I remember some *A liveries where the fuselage was painted in colours of member airlines....an A340-600 would struggle to have this scheme now.

Himeno Mar 12, 2012 11:55 pm


Originally Posted by Blackcloud (Post 18186395)
I would agree with this now but not 10 years ago.
*A is becoming the alliance, if not already is. Of course it helps when you have hundereds of airlines:p Yes that is an exageration but I remember some *A liveries where the fuselage was painted in colours of member airlines....an A340-600 would struggle to have this scheme now.

*A has too many members that they can't work well together. It might as well be UA, LH and SQ while the other airlines do what they're told.

razMJ Mar 20, 2012 12:33 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 18189340)
*A has too many members that they can't work well together. It might as well be UA, LH and SQ while the other airlines do what they're told.

I agree

Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY?

Platinum A332 Mar 21, 2012 1:38 am


Originally Posted by rurouni212 (Post 18169337)
Agreed. Although the Air China joint ownership thing certainly makes things interesting, the only way I could see CX leaving oneworld is if the alliance was on the verge of collapse (which it is not).

What are the chances of CA joining oneworld? It does not seem that they are heavily in a partnership with any of the Star Alliance , and where they are they can be easily replaced. In fact their most extensive partnership is with CX and KA, both oneworld members.

- Replace NH with JL on Japan-China flights
- QF can replace MU with CA on Australian flights - Qantas can fly to Shanghai, and Air China for Beijing flights. QF and CA codeshared on the PEK-SYD route at one stage.
- Partner with AA on the US flights.

Whereas CX on the other hand, has a huge rival in * in SQ. Plus it codeshares heavily with AA even to South America, BA in inter-Europe, JL on flights to Japan amongst others.

I think we might see HU/HX join oneworld (providing a mini HKG base to star), and CA come to oneworld longer term. To me it seems logical, feel free to disagree.

Dieuwer Mar 21, 2012 6:43 am


Originally Posted by razMJ (Post 18238137)
I agree

Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY?

AF/KLM is talking to AirBerlin about a "strategic partnership". So much for joining OW!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...land-says.html

http://www.telegraaf.nl/dft/nieuws_d..._France__.html

"Airberlin has accepted the invitation of Air France KLM to talk about a strategic cooperation."

onobond Mar 21, 2012 6:44 am


Originally Posted by razMJ (Post 18238137)
I agree

Considering AB joined today, OW now have more game in Germany and the rest of Europe! Anyone know if there is any form of link now between OW and EY?

Not yet. EY and AA seem to expand exchange programs, sure hope this could evolve to EY joining OW.

:)

rurouni212 Mar 21, 2012 11:25 am


Originally Posted by Platinum A332 (Post 18242516)
What are the chances of CA joining oneworld? It does not seem that they are heavily in a partnership with any of the Star Alliance , and where they are they can be easily replaced. In fact their most extensive partnership is with CX and KA, both oneworld members.

- Replace NH with JL on Japan-China flights
- QF can replace MU with CA on Australian flights - Qantas can fly to Shanghai, and Air China for Beijing flights. QF and CA codeshared on the PEK-SYD route at one stage.
- Partner with AA on the US flights.

Whereas CX on the other hand, has a huge rival in * in SQ. Plus it codeshares heavily with AA even to South America, BA in inter-Europe, JL on flights to Japan amongst others.

I think we might see HU/HX join oneworld (providing a mini HKG base to star), and CA come to oneworld longer term. To me it seems logical, feel free to disagree.

Air China seems pretty happy in *, slowly growing into a bigger and bigger role in the alliance. The scenario you laid out does make sense should they defect, although the second point is kind of moot from air china's point of view (also I'm assuming you meant Hainan joins *A, not oneworld). Alot of this Air China/Cathay defecting talk depends heavily upon who is percieved to be calling the shots. I would put my money on the Chinese government as opposed to swire pacific. Also, I could see Cathay defecting to *A if oneworld was collapsing and Singapore airlines decided to leave. Cathay could codeshare with united/avianca/taca/copa for south america, ANA replaces JAL and lufthansa and friends provide a number of different bases in europe to work from.

moondog Mar 21, 2012 11:39 am


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 18032201)
QF and CX not working well together isn't because QF doesn't want to, its CX being CX.

I have a friend who has bounced around in executive positions in airlines around Asia for the past 20 years that routinely fills me in on head office gossip. I trust his opinions because his network includes decision makers at all of the airlines being discussed here.

Cutting to the chase, he recently told me that QF's recent attempt to partner with HNA really pissed off CX. In spite of the fact that his current employer is a member of one of the alliances that has solid intra-China connectivity, he fully respects CX's desire to be OW's link to China.

Separately, I've been working on a project with HNA for the past year, and have learned a lot about the company in the process. Those guys have a ton of money, and seem quite happy doing things their own way... almost cowboy style (e.g. buy a hotel in some far flung city, start flying there, and hope for the best). While kissing up to CX isn't beyond the realm of possibility, this idea doesn't gel with what I understand about their corporate culture; e.g. they are immensely proud of their new HKG-LHR flight.

Aisle Seat H Mar 25, 2012 5:20 am

Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...

http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me

;) :D

rurouni212 Mar 25, 2012 9:58 am


Originally Posted by Aisle Seat H (Post 18268781)
Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...

http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me

;) :D

If you want to talk affiliate members, you can throw in NIKI as well.

Awesom Andy Mar 25, 2012 4:26 pm

Here's to a crazy idea, but since QF doesn't get on with CX, and now doesn't get on with MH either, perhaps QF should leave OW, and join ST. Virgin is somewhat aligned with *A, and with SQ obviously being in *A, that's not really an option.

But if QF does join ST, they would have instantly created a network in China, via MU in Shanghai, and to a lesser degree CZ which flies to major AU cities already. The link to Japan is lost, but with non-stop flights from eastern AU to the US, I don't see it as a big loss. However, they gain VN's network, and further collaboration in that area would also help with Jetstar's somewhat haphazard relationship in that country. And then, there's Garuda... but I can't see them being too happy about letting QF in. :)

QF also already codeshare with AF to France, and its frequent flyer program also earns points on AZ. But apart from this, the network does have a pretty big hole in Europe. Having said that though, given QF's recent strategic shift in focusing in Asia and regional flights rather than the ultra-long-haul segments to Europe, moving to ST actually sounds like a good strategic fit.

EDIT: Adding to the above, I've just been made aware that Jetstar Hong Kong is launching as a joint venture with MU. As silly and embarrassing it is for a OW founding member to defect, it does sound like it might just work out... (although I might not say the same after I recover from my red-eye flight).

rurouni212 Mar 25, 2012 8:24 pm


Originally Posted by Awesom Andy (Post 18271836)

EDIT: Adding to the above, I've just been made aware that Jetstar Hong Kong is launching as a joint venture with MU. As silly and embarrassing it is for a OW founding member to defect, it does sound like it might just work out... (although I might not say the same after I recover from my red-eye flight).

Just read the same thing. Cathay can't be happy about this.

Platinum A332 Mar 26, 2012 4:36 am

CX should just partner up with Virgin Australia to piss QF off.

ernestnywang Mar 26, 2012 7:08 am


Originally Posted by Platinum A332 (Post 18274324)
CX should just partner up with Virgin Australia to piss QF off.

Actually ex-Taiwan one can choose intra-AU add-on on either QF or DJ when buying a CX TKT. I believe that it would be the case for ex-HKG as well.

onobond Mar 26, 2012 9:54 am


Originally Posted by rurouni212 (Post 18269763)


Originally Posted by Aisle Seat H (Post 18268781)
Die?!? OW had TWO new members join it these past week or so, cos in addition to AB...

http://www.businesstraveller.com/new...s-affiliate-me

;) :D

If you want to talk affiliate members, you can throw in NIKI as well.

Yeah, THREE new then, and MH warming up before autumn entrance...

Did I hear EY???:confused:

:cool:

bennytma Mar 26, 2012 12:19 pm


Originally Posted by onobond (Post 18275728)
Yeah, THREE new then, and MH warming up before autumn entrance...

Did I hear EY???:confused:

:cool:

EY joining OW would be AWESOME.

PVDtoDEL May 23, 2012 7:59 pm

Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!

rurouni212 May 23, 2012 8:58 pm


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 18631850)
Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!

Probably just keeping them there in the unlikely event they survive.

CXBA May 24, 2012 5:39 am


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 18631850)
Shocked that Kingfisher hasn't gone down the drain yet... In fact, they are still listed as a future member of oneworld!

you guys have piled on an astounding quantity of death wishes for Kingfisher the past months. You know, maybe you've just given them additional support and help them actually slowly come over their predicament :cool:
So, next time you really really wish them down the drain, try a different tactic, shower them with abundant praise! :D

rurouni212 May 24, 2012 9:25 am


Originally Posted by CXBA (Post 18633602)
you guys have piled on an astounding quantity of death wishes for Kingfisher the past months. You know, maybe you've just given them additional support and help them actually slowly come over their predicament :cool:
So, next time you really really wish them down the drain, try a different tactic, shower them with abundant praise! :D

Kingfisher is the best airline ever!

PVDtoDEL May 24, 2012 10:13 am

How could anybody think that Kingfisher is going bankrupt! They will be here forever, the most profitable company in the world!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.