Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Oneworld and MU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 7:56 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Green
Posts: 876
Oneworld and MU

what is the actual reason that Oneworld failed to recruit MU (China Eastern Airlines, now a member elect of Skyteam) to join Oneworld?
are the following a part of the reasons?
1.lack of sponsors to help its integration to Oneworld
2.the shareholder relationship between CA and CX
3.the CEO of MU is the former CZ (China Southern Airlines) boss
derek2010 is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 10:06 am
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,477
MU was on track to join OneWorld. It will be sponsored by CX as CX/MU already in FQTV corporation. Then MU signed a lot of deals with AA/JL/QF and on track with BA in some time.

But the crises within MU and MU start looking for relationship with SQ somehow delayed the process.

Then what happened was the former CEO from CZ come to MU and stopped the process in his personal will and move MU towards SkyTeam.

He judges that JAL stay in OneWorld then DL will have the one billion US dollars to invest in other carriers...Which we all know would be dream on.
FlyerTalker688786 is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 10:06 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
I would add....

4. Complacency and lack of aggression on the part of OW carriers.

Lets hope that Hainan will join in the future. Since they're the last China airline to join an alliance, OW would look completely stupid if they lost them to another alliance.
ByrdluvsAWACO is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.