Hotel in Auckland: Hilton or Langham?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SAN
Programs: AS 100K, DL MM, AA PLT
Posts: 2,937
Hotel in Auckland: Hilton or Langham?
Due to the sudden closure of the Westin, I find myself needing to decide between a Deluxe Harbor View room at the Hilton or a Park Suite at the Langham for a 5-night stay next week. We're traveling with my 2-year-old son, so I'd typically take a suite in an instant, but I'm under the impression the Hilton has a much better location for tourists.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
#2
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SYD
Programs: DJ, QF, SPG, Hilton
Posts: 2,984
The Hilton is by the harbour and apart from the Viaduct, hasn't got much near it. The Langham is at the other end of the CBD, up a slope. The Hilton is probably slightly better with a small kid especially if you don't want to walk up a hill.
#3
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: QF Gold, VA Red, SQ, HH Silver, Marriott Gold.
Posts: 314
The Langham is a good hotel but some walk up the hill from the CBD.
The Hilton is right at the beginning of the CBD with views of the harbour.
Location of the Hilton is better, and hotel should be of a quality that pleases.
Know the Westin had issues with the owners of the rooms, but didn't know it had actually closed.
The Hilton is right at the beginning of the CBD with views of the harbour.
Location of the Hilton is better, and hotel should be of a quality that pleases.
Know the Westin had issues with the owners of the rooms, but didn't know it had actually closed.
#4
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
The Langham is actually in a great location, at the edge of the CBD (so avoids traffic with easy access to the motorway and airport). Also on a somewhat edgy road, wavering between seedy and trendy (a bit like Times Square, if you can imagine Auckland having that). Tons better than the Hilton, which is like a cruise ship (and often has a cruise ship docked, looking into your room -- a rather disconcerting experience!). Really no contest, the Langham is far better as a hotel, and for me has a better location. The "climb" up a hill is just 1 block, nothing compared to Nob Hill in SF, and more fun than an obstacle.
#5
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 509
It was a few years ago we stayed at the Langham. Nice room and each floor had access to a couple of computers by the elevator. There is a Club floor upstairs but we were not signed up. there was a free shuttle to take one down the hill to the waterfront; it stopped by the Duty Free store.
I thought the area reminded me of Berkeley. An eclectic mix of stores: Korean, Chinese, coffee houses, small eateries around the area. Close-by to a University. I think there was an old cemetary in the area, too. Enjoyed exploring the area and visit to Auckland.
I thought the area reminded me of Berkeley. An eclectic mix of stores: Korean, Chinese, coffee houses, small eateries around the area. Close-by to a University. I think there was an old cemetary in the area, too. Enjoyed exploring the area and visit to Auckland.
#6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Programs: NZ*G, QF NB, UA 1K, AA ExecPlat, IHG PlatAmb, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold, ZE1 PC
Posts: 2,636
The Langham is my usual hotel in AKL (when I'm not staying with family). The AKL CBD isn't big enough that distance from anything should be an issue and there are pretty frequent buses down Symonds St, with a stop right outside the Langham.
I like the hotel and have always had a good stay there, with a lot of excellent memories.
I like the hotel and have always had a good stay there, with a lot of excellent memories.
#9
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Programs: NZ*G, QF NB, UA 1K, AA ExecPlat, IHG PlatAmb, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold, ZE1 PC
Posts: 2,636
You have a number of pretty big office buildings, student accommodation, Auckland Hospital, Auckland University, restaurants and bars, and a couple of other hotels within quick walking distance of the Langham - long before you get to any seedy areas.
#10
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SYD
Programs: DJ, QF, SPG, Hilton
Posts: 2,984
Sky City is a bit of a dump (although I think they'd a slight refresh recently), it's often full of tour groups. With the casino as part of the hotel, I'd avoid unless you're into that.
However, the Sky City Grand is much better and reflected in the price.
The Heritage is average (still better than Sky City), and is an apartment/hotel.
However, the Sky City Grand is much better and reflected in the price.
The Heritage is average (still better than Sky City), and is an apartment/hotel.
#11
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Programs: NZ*G, QF NB, UA 1K, AA ExecPlat, IHG PlatAmb, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold, ZE1 PC
Posts: 2,636
Sky City is a bit of a dump (although I think they'd a slight refresh recently), it's often full of tour groups. With the casino as part of the hotel, I'd avoid unless you're into that.
However, the Sky City Grand is much better and reflected in the price.
The Heritage is average (still better than Sky City), and is an apartment/hotel.
However, the Sky City Grand is much better and reflected in the price.
The Heritage is average (still better than Sky City), and is an apartment/hotel.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SAN
Programs: AS 100K, DL MM, AA PLT
Posts: 2,937
While I obviously have not (yet) had the chance to stay at the Hilton, I just wanted to report that we are very happy with the Langham. ^
We actually quite like the area immediately surrounding the hotel; it has a nice variety of shops and cafes, and Myers park with its playground was a delightful find for our son. The shuttle to the water is quick and reliable (with a very friendly driver), but we've taken to walking or the city bus (a great many of which stop right in front of the hotel) the past few days as the weather has been wonderful and the distance indeed short---although the hill does give one a workout, especially with a child on your back!
Thanks for all the input. The Hilton does cut an imposing line in the harbor, but the difference in location certainly shouldn't seem to weigh much into one's decision about which property to select.
We actually quite like the area immediately surrounding the hotel; it has a nice variety of shops and cafes, and Myers park with its playground was a delightful find for our son. The shuttle to the water is quick and reliable (with a very friendly driver), but we've taken to walking or the city bus (a great many of which stop right in front of the hotel) the past few days as the weather has been wonderful and the distance indeed short---although the hill does give one a workout, especially with a child on your back!
Thanks for all the input. The Hilton does cut an imposing line in the harbor, but the difference in location certainly shouldn't seem to weigh much into one's decision about which property to select.
#13
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Langham as a chain is very high quality and often the best choice in whatever city. Glad it worked out for you; the Hilton in AKL gets a lot better press, despite being a worse hotel. The Hilton location is really not that great, once the novelty wears off; the area around the Langham has gotten steadily better over the years, a decade ago there was a bit of a drug use problem there.