Embraer's start flying today [Aug 21 2007]...
#16
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Programs: DL GE
Posts: 1,654
Dumb question, are they going to replace all the single class CRJ's with these *ultimately*?
Thanks!
Thanks!
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Unlikely ... right now they are going on routes that used to be served by the RJ-85's. In the long run as DC-9's finally are retired, I would expect some 76-seaters to replace DC-9-30's on routes with light load factors.
#18
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: fort worth, tx AA Gold,Best Western-Diamond, HH- Gold, Marriott-Silver
Posts: 2,737
Is the RJ-85 the Avro? If so I don't remember an RJ-85 on the DFW-MSP route. There used to be one on the DFW-MEM route. I think there have been some CRJ's on the MSP route here and there. The first CRJ in DFW was on the IND route which no longer exists. I'll have to go over to DFW and see the new bird. Glad it is two class.
#19
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SYD+TYO+GFK
Programs: UA 1K, QF Plat, VA Gold, IHG Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, Coles FlyBuys
Posts: 2,805
Mrs. TrayflowinUK and I are booked on the E175 MSP-DFW next Friday... I'll report back on the plane. Any specific info people want? (No, I'm not bringing a tape measure!)
#20
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Programs: HH Gold; AA AAdvantage Mbr; DL Skymiles Silver Medallion; World of Hyatt Mbr; NK Free Spirit Mbr
Posts: 2,531
#21
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,884
Take some pics. It's a beautiful aircraft that doesn't mind being photographed one bit.
#22
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GRB
Programs: WorldPerks Platinum
Posts: 13
These will be flying to GRB, hopefully to replace the CRJ flights. They flew one to Green Bay on a "promotional tour" last week and scored some good local press coverage.
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/...=2007708150559
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/...=2007708150559
#24
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ROC
Programs: DL DM, HH Diamond, National EE
Posts: 1,229
Here's hoping they'll put it on the MSP-HPN route. I would think this route would generate some decent revenue with a first class cabin. I've avoided HPN ever since it went all CRJ. Used to be an Avro from MSP-HPN and one or two DC-9s out of DTW.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
MHT-MSP gets them starting on November 4. Now if only GSO could get an upgrade from being all CRJ - an upgrade to the CRJ-900s or E-175s would be an improvement.
#26
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rochester NY, Marriott Silver, Hilton Gold, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 87
That said, I'll take a Embraer 175 for ROC, please. We used to have a nice little 4 eng. plane that had 1st, the BAe146 (?) I think but I guess they went away.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: DL SkyClub Lifer
Posts: 10,000
This is a good thing, since real 146's are sufficiently decrepit that an Air France pilot crossing the English Channel in one with me aboard made a mid-flight announcement just as we got over the water, reminding pax to review the safety card instructions for water landings because "this is an old airplane."
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
#29
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: GRB
Programs: DL Diamond Charter Member, 3 Million Miler, Hertz Pres Club, Hilton Gold
Posts: 525
NW has two extra rows in their configuration compared to the US E-175's configuration. I doubt NW would EVER have done that if, prior to ordering these things, the entire NW Board of Directors were required to take a two hour one-way trip in an aircraft configured like this seated shoulder to shoulder with the passenger in front of them having their seat at maximum recline. No offense but passenger comfort is NOT about how much headroom an aircraft has - comfort is about room for butts and legs!
#30
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GSP
Programs: NW-Plat, PC-Gold, SPG Gold, National Exec.
Posts: 142
Not exactly apples to apples comparison
NW has two extra rows in their configuration compared to the US E-175's configuration. I doubt NW would EVER have done that if, prior to ordering these things, the entire NW Board of Directors were required to take a two hour one-way trip in an aircraft configured like this seated shoulder to shoulder with the passenger in front of them having their seat at maximum recline. No offense but passenger comfort is NOT about how much headroom an aircraft has - comfort is about room for butts and legs!
The pitch on the E-175 is 31" which is the same as NW's CRJ, 757 and DC-9.
Another big difference is that NW's E-170's have a F section, where US doesn't. To me this is a big selling point for NW-I miss the Avro.
Last edited by jman4l; Aug 24, 2007 at 4:01 am Reason: correct typo