DTW terminal delayed again!
#1
Original Poster
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA USA
Posts: 638
DTW terminal delayed again!
According to a poster on another message board, the new terminal is delayed now from January to April of next year. Evidently, there is a problem with a tunnel. Has anyone heard this or can confirm it?
#2
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MKE
Programs: DL Platinum; Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 1,119
NWA web site still lists January 20 -- for whatever that's worth!
#3




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seat 1A or 59B
Posts: 564
Tunnel trouble?
Lets not hope it's the same problem CO had here in CLE. I still think it smells even today.
Lets not hope it's the same problem CO had here in CLE. I still think it smells even today.
#4


Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Programs: Airline Free Agent, Fairmont Lifetime Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,064
Living in SE Michigan I have not heard anything at all about the new terminal being delayed again...until I do, I am counting down the days until the suffering of using our dismal airport are over 

#5
Original Poster
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA USA
Posts: 638
I hope it's just a rumour but here is the thread I saw about it.
http://www.usaviation.com/forums/ubb...&f=10&t=000012
http://www.usaviation.com/forums/ubb...&f=10&t=000012
#6
Original Member



Join Date: May 1998
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Programs: AAdvantage EXP/1mm/Admirals,United Silver+Club (life),Marriott Titanium,Hilton & Accor Gold
Posts: 5,064
#7
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South Bend, IN - UA 1P
Posts: 137
Rats! I had specifically routed myself through DTW on 1/21/02 in the hopes of getting an early look at the NEW DTW....I wonder if it's too late to change the flight to MSP. 
[This message has been edited by GRR_Flyer (edited 11-19-2001).]

[This message has been edited by GRR_Flyer (edited 11-19-2001).]
#8
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 81
In the ongoing DTW terminal saga, it now looks like the date is Feb 24th, 2002:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011121/mnw009_1.html
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011121/mnw009_1.html
#9




Join Date: May 2000
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: SQ, LH, AMEX, Citi, Cap1
Posts: 4,113
Well, I don't feel too bad. I have a flight arriving from NRT in early January with a stopover in DTW, leaving on January 19th. So, I have no regrets about leaving DTW on January 19th.
Now, question is: I'm going Europe in March, I can either connect in DTW via NW or EWR via CO. I wonder which airline will be getting my business? [I miss the old smilie graphics]
Now, question is: I'm going Europe in March, I can either connect in DTW via NW or EWR via CO. I wonder which airline will be getting my business? [I miss the old smilie graphics]
#10




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
aw c'mon everyone.... i know what the real problem is... they are having computer troubles! it seems the software upgrade on the connection computer isn't working right. you know which computer i mean. the one that makes sure that if you come in at the end of C, you depart from the end of F, and vice versa! or that if you come in on commuter at G, your connection is actually a CO flight departing from B! i think it's stored in an outbuilding disguised as a fire station in a remote corner of the airport...
the software must be making the connections in the new terminal far too simple!
------------------
All Hail Mighty Oregon!
GO DUCKS GO!
the software must be making the connections in the new terminal far too simple!
------------------
All Hail Mighty Oregon!
GO DUCKS GO!
#11
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MIDWEST
Posts: 468
Northwest now says Feb 24, 2002
according to the article in the Detroit Free press click on the link below to see the article
http://www.freep.com/news/latestnews...9_20011121.htm
according to the article in the Detroit Free press click on the link below to see the article
http://www.freep.com/news/latestnews...9_20011121.htm
#12
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mall of America, WorldGateway, and points between
Posts: 373
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by duxfan:
aw c'mon everyone.... i know what the real problem is... they are having computer troubles! it seems the software upgrade on the connection computer isn't working right. you know which computer i mean. the one that makes sure that if you come in at the end of C, you depart from the end of F, and vice versa! or that if you come in on commuter at G, your connection is actually a CO flight departing from B! i think it's stored in an outbuilding disguised as a fire station in a remote corner of the airport...
the software must be making the connections in the new terminal far too simple!
</font>
aw c'mon everyone.... i know what the real problem is... they are having computer troubles! it seems the software upgrade on the connection computer isn't working right. you know which computer i mean. the one that makes sure that if you come in at the end of C, you depart from the end of F, and vice versa! or that if you come in on commuter at G, your connection is actually a CO flight departing from B! i think it's stored in an outbuilding disguised as a fire station in a remote corner of the airport...
the software must be making the connections in the new terminal far too simple!
</font>
All joking aside, it's mainly because 40-50 new bomb-sniffing and X-ray machines must be ordered and installed in order to comply with the recent FAA law that goes into effect in late January: ALL checked bags must be X-rayed.
The interim plan, however, is being tested in MSP and MEM and working quite well. Every piece of checked luggage has a bar code that is used at the initial check-in point to make sure the bags go to the correct plane. Now those bar codes will be scanned each time a piece of luggage is loaded onto a plane. It's instantly transmitted to the computer system indicating the bag is on the flight. If the passenger fails to board but we know the bag is on and in which compartment it was loaded on the aircraft, the bag can (relatively) easily be removed.
The new system will be much better, though, and of course requires new electrical wiring, new X-ray machines, etc. So I guess it's good in a way to delay the terminal so that it opens with the most effective security initiatives as possible.
#13




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
thanks for the update, PARSpro!
i for one am really looking forward to the new DTW terminal. i might even make int'l inbound connections there now.
i'll be sure try out the new bag matching later this week when i fly out to PDX (via MSP both ways). Now if only my CO priority bag tags meant something to a NW ramper...
------------------
All Hail Mighty Oregon!
GO DUCKS GO!
i for one am really looking forward to the new DTW terminal. i might even make int'l inbound connections there now.
i'll be sure try out the new bag matching later this week when i fly out to PDX (via MSP both ways). Now if only my CO priority bag tags meant something to a NW ramper...
------------------
All Hail Mighty Oregon!
GO DUCKS GO!
#14
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Madison, WI, USA; NW Platinum, Marriott Silver, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 938
Based on my experience yesterday the current software also makes sure that bags with the yellow "Priority" stickers come out for luggage pickup LAST! (There were a bunch of us from first class waiting for our luggage. It all came out together after all the non-priority luggage).
#15
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 739
the contractor for the baggage handling
system is bea systems. sound familiar?
[they did the infamous "denver" system]
imo, additional delays beyond feb 2002 are
likely. one of the larger electrical
contractors pulled 500 people off the
job due to a [non-]payment dispute.
-doug
system is bea systems. sound familiar?
[they did the infamous "denver" system]
imo, additional delays beyond feb 2002 are
likely. one of the larger electrical
contractors pulled 500 people off the
job due to a [non-]payment dispute.
-doug

