NW/CO Upgrade Priority/Rule Changes?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CO Plat Elite; ST Elite+; HH Gold; Starwood Plat; WN CompPass; Nashville, TN
Posts: 110
NW/CO Upgrade Priority/Rule Changes?
Hello -- I am a CO Plat and fly on NW all the time. I travel frequently with the same person, who is now a WP plat. She used to always get upgraded after me (when she was WP gold). Now it seems that as a CO plat that NW has changed their rules. Prior to this apparent changing of rules, my upgrade percentage was about 100%, now it's about 25%.
Case in point:
03DEC NW1746 BNA-DTW
03DEC NW1009 DTW-IND
04DEC NW1880 IND-DTW
04DEC NW1743 DTW-BNA
1) We both both the same fare class (K)
2) I bought my ticket before her
3) She has been upgraded on *ALL* segments within the normal interval
4) I have been upgraded on *NONE* of my segments to date
I called RES and the WP line and they indicated that my record indicates that upgrades were attempted, but not possible.
I looked into her seatmaps several times and saw that FC was virtually empty when she was upgraded and now it is pretty much full. WP indicates that "this could be due to paid first class or folks using miles" which I think is hogwash given that this has happened on all 4 flights. They indicate my record is just fine.
Anyone else had this before?
Case in point:
03DEC NW1746 BNA-DTW
03DEC NW1009 DTW-IND
04DEC NW1880 IND-DTW
04DEC NW1743 DTW-BNA
1) We both both the same fare class (K)
2) I bought my ticket before her
3) She has been upgraded on *ALL* segments within the normal interval
4) I have been upgraded on *NONE* of my segments to date
I called RES and the WP line and they indicated that my record indicates that upgrades were attempted, but not possible.
I looked into her seatmaps several times and saw that FC was virtually empty when she was upgraded and now it is pretty much full. WP indicates that "this could be due to paid first class or folks using miles" which I think is hogwash given that this has happened on all 4 flights. They indicate my record is just fine.
Anyone else had this before?
#2
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Round Lake, IL
Programs: UA GS, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,064
NW1746 P3F3
NW1009 P9F8
NW1880 P5F3
NW1743 P8F5
Those are some odd numbers. It could be they are holding back Rs. As you can see, 3 of the flights they are holding back some F over P so they could be holding back even more R. I would still have them check to see if somehow there was an incorrect name match or other reason you were overlooked. Gold EUA should have just ran for the first 2 so maybe you got your UG overnight - otherwise call back.
NW1009 P9F8
NW1880 P5F3
NW1743 P8F5
Those are some odd numbers. It could be they are holding back Rs. As you can see, 3 of the flights they are holding back some F over P so they could be holding back even more R. I would still have them check to see if somehow there was an incorrect name match or other reason you were overlooked. Gold EUA should have just ran for the first 2 so maybe you got your UG overnight - otherwise call back.
Originally Posted by BNAtraveller
Hello -- I am a CO Plat and fly on NW all the time. I travel frequently with the same person, who is now a WP plat. She used to always get upgraded after me (when she was WP gold). Now it seems that as a CO plat that NW has changed their rules. Prior to this apparent changing of rules, my upgrade percentage was about 100%, now it's about 25%.
Case in point:
03DEC NW1746 BNA-DTW
03DEC NW1009 DTW-IND
04DEC NW1880 IND-DTW
04DEC NW1743 DTW-BNA
1) We both both the same fare class (K)
2) I bought my ticket before her
3) She has been upgraded on *ALL* segments within the normal interval
4) I have been upgraded on *NONE* of my segments to date
I called RES and the WP line and they indicated that my record indicates that upgrades were attempted, but not possible.
I looked into her seatmaps several times and saw that FC was virtually empty when she was upgraded and now it is pretty much full. WP indicates that "this could be due to paid first class or folks using miles" which I think is hogwash given that this has happened on all 4 flights. They indicate my record is just fine.
Anyone else had this before?
Case in point:
03DEC NW1746 BNA-DTW
03DEC NW1009 DTW-IND
04DEC NW1880 IND-DTW
04DEC NW1743 DTW-BNA
1) We both both the same fare class (K)
2) I bought my ticket before her
3) She has been upgraded on *ALL* segments within the normal interval
4) I have been upgraded on *NONE* of my segments to date
I called RES and the WP line and they indicated that my record indicates that upgrades were attempted, but not possible.
I looked into her seatmaps several times and saw that FC was virtually empty when she was upgraded and now it is pretty much full. WP indicates that "this could be due to paid first class or folks using miles" which I think is hogwash given that this has happened on all 4 flights. They indicate my record is just fine.
Anyone else had this before?
#3
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lansing, MI USA, DL DM
Posts: 922
It appears based on your post that it is working correctly as NW Plat should trump a CO Plat. That being said I have had more problems getting upgraded prior to the flight in the past couple of months and based on other posts so are others... I also think NW is keeping "r" bucket relatively low hoping to sell the FC tickets.
One thing to keep in mind is that this is the time of yrear when there are the most Plats as some folks mad eit for the first time in 2005 while others are leftovers from 2004. After March 1, I think things get back to normal... Good luck
One thing to keep in mind is that this is the time of yrear when there are the most Plats as some folks mad eit for the first time in 2005 while others are leftovers from 2004. After March 1, I think things get back to normal... Good luck
#4
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: fort worth, tx AA Gold,Best Western-Diamond, HH- Gold, Marriott-Silver
Posts: 2,737
CO and NW do not have the same criteria for processing upgrades. On CO it does not matter if you are plat on NW or CO both are thrown in the same pot and processed by factors such as fare paid, date bought, etc. On NW it is all NW plats (regardless of class paid or date bought) before any CO plats are processed. Then all NW Golds, before any CO golds, etc, etc.
Another major difference between the two is in companion upgrades. On NW metal a NW Plat companion gets upgraded with the plat at the 5 day window. Day of at the gate, Gold and Plat companions are upgraded after all Elites (NW and CO) are upgraded if space is still available. On CO for day of upgrades at the airport the companion is put in the same order as the Plat/Gold and upgraded before any silver has a shot.
So from your description it sounds like it is working exactly how it was programed to work.
Another major difference between the two is in companion upgrades. On NW metal a NW Plat companion gets upgraded with the plat at the 5 day window. Day of at the gate, Gold and Plat companions are upgraded after all Elites (NW and CO) are upgraded if space is still available. On CO for day of upgrades at the airport the companion is put in the same order as the Plat/Gold and upgraded before any silver has a shot.
So from your description it sounds like it is working exactly how it was programed to work.
Last edited by wldtrvlr; Dec 1, 2005 at 2:23 pm
#5
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
Actually, my understanding was that NW *always* put all the elites together, and CO, until the past year or so, kept them split.
Truth is, I don't think anyone really knows for sure.
Steve
Truth is, I don't think anyone really knows for sure.
Steve
#6
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EP, AA AC
Posts: 4,268
Originally Posted by wldtrvlr
CO and NW do not have the same criteria for processing upgrades. On CO it does not matter if you are plat on NW or CO both are thrown in the same pot and processed by factors such as fare paid, date bought, etc. On NW it is all NW plats (regardless of class paid or date bought) before any CO plats are processed. Then all NW Golds, before any CO golds, etc, etc.
Another major difference between the two is in companion upgrades. On NW metal a NW Plat companion gets upgraded with the plat at the 5 day window. Day of at the gate, Gold and Plat companions are upgraded after all Elites (NW and CO) are upgraded if space is still available. On CO for day of upgrades at the airport the companion is put in the same order as the Plat/Gold and upgraded before any silver has a shot.
So from your description it sounds like it is working exactly how it was programed to work.
Another major difference between the two is in companion upgrades. On NW metal a NW Plat companion gets upgraded with the plat at the 5 day window. Day of at the gate, Gold and Plat companions are upgraded after all Elites (NW and CO) are upgraded if space is still available. On CO for day of upgrades at the airport the companion is put in the same order as the Plat/Gold and upgraded before any silver has a shot.
So from your description it sounds like it is working exactly how it was programed to work.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: Continental Gold Elite, United Premier Executive
Posts: 6,766
Originally Posted by sllevin
Actually, my understanding was that NW *always* put all the elites together, and CO, until the past year or so, kept them split.
Truth is, I don't think anyone really knows for sure.
Steve
Truth is, I don't think anyone really knows for sure.
Steve
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CO Plat Elite; ST Elite+; HH Gold; Starwood Plat; WN CompPass; Nashville, TN
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by Bigpops
It appears based on your post that it is working correctly as NW Plat should trump a CO Plat. That being said I have had more problems getting upgraded prior to the flight in the past couple of months and based on other posts so are others... I also think NW is keeping "r" bucket relatively low hoping to sell the FC tickets.
One thing to keep in mind is that this is the time of yrear when there are the most Plats as some folks mad eit for the first time in 2005 while others are leftovers from 2004. After March 1, I think things get back to normal... Good luck
One thing to keep in mind is that this is the time of yrear when there are the most Plats as some folks mad eit for the first time in 2005 while others are leftovers from 2004. After March 1, I think things get back to normal... Good luck
#9
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SRQ
Posts: 2,168
sorry but I am confused... you said your companion was WP Plat now.... am I missing something?
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CO Plat Elite; ST Elite+; HH Gold; Starwood Plat; WN CompPass; Nashville, TN
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by mdb
sorry but I am confused... you said your companion was WP Plat now.... am I missing something?
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BER
Programs: Hilton Gold, BA Gold
Posts: 15,757
anyone knows how AF/KLM elites are in the ranking? between NW and CO?
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
Originally Posted by chrissxb
anyone knows how AF/KLM elites are in the ranking? between NW and CO?
#13
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lansing, MI USA, DL DM
Posts: 922
Originally Posted by BNAtraveller
Agreed that she should trump me as she's NW and I'm CO, but the issue here is that I am being processed after Golds and Silvers apparently due to my fare class (K), despite the fact that she bought the EXACT SAME route at the EXACT SAME fare class.
#14
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: DL Million Miler
Posts: 1,963
>>>>>while NW OLCI puts you on the upgrade list (was one of those strange P9 situations where EUA did not run), KL OLCI does not...
I'll be flying HAM-AMS-DTW-MSN in a couple weeks, and had read on FlyerTalk about someone doing OLCI not for the first flight on an itinerary (which would be the KL flight HAM-AMS) but actually doing OLCI for a later connection in the trip. Wouldn't it be possible to do a nwa.com OLCI for just the DTW-MSN portion to be officially in the system--and even to ABORT the check-in after being asked told I was on the first-class waitlist? Is there any reason this wouldn't work, or might cause problems?
I'll be flying HAM-AMS-DTW-MSN in a couple weeks, and had read on FlyerTalk about someone doing OLCI not for the first flight on an itinerary (which would be the KL flight HAM-AMS) but actually doing OLCI for a later connection in the trip. Wouldn't it be possible to do a nwa.com OLCI for just the DTW-MSN portion to be officially in the system--and even to ABORT the check-in after being asked told I was on the first-class waitlist? Is there any reason this wouldn't work, or might cause problems?
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
Originally Posted by SpinzCity
>>>>>while NW OLCI puts you on the upgrade list (was one of those strange P9 situations where EUA did not run), KL OLCI does not...
Wouldn't it be possible to do a nwa.com OLCI for just the DTW-MSN portion to be officially in the system--and even to ABORT the check-in after being asked told I was on the first-class waitlist? Is there any reason this wouldn't work, or might cause problems?
Wouldn't it be possible to do a nwa.com OLCI for just the DTW-MSN portion to be officially in the system--and even to ABORT the check-in after being asked told I was on the first-class waitlist? Is there any reason this wouldn't work, or might cause problems?