Charlie Card vs Charlie Ticket
#16
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ayrshire, and sometimes Massachusetts
Programs: NW, DL
Posts: 135
Another possible reason that there isn't an uproar over the latest change to Charlie Cards and Charlie Tickets is that for some folks, the result of the change in the fare structure is that fares have gone DOWN.
My monthly T pass used to cost $79 a month because my closest T stop was the outlying red line station, and it cost double the fare throughout most of the system. (Back when it was still tokens, it took 2 tokens to go into town, and if you were coming out of the city, a token to get on and a token to get off.) This extra surcharge was done away with, and now I pay $59 a month for the joy (ha!) of riding the T.
If you think the fare structure doesn't make sense, how about this? The T just built a new commuter rail line to the south shore. I was very excited about this initially, but I don't know if I will ever ride it because of the fare structure. There is a new station about a mile and a half from where I live. The T is about 3 miles from where I live. It costs $59 a month to travel on the T, but $151 a month for a commuter rail pass for my nearest stop. Huh?
My monthly T pass used to cost $79 a month because my closest T stop was the outlying red line station, and it cost double the fare throughout most of the system. (Back when it was still tokens, it took 2 tokens to go into town, and if you were coming out of the city, a token to get on and a token to get off.) This extra surcharge was done away with, and now I pay $59 a month for the joy (ha!) of riding the T.
If you think the fare structure doesn't make sense, how about this? The T just built a new commuter rail line to the south shore. I was very excited about this initially, but I don't know if I will ever ride it because of the fare structure. There is a new station about a mile and a half from where I live. The T is about 3 miles from where I live. It costs $59 a month to travel on the T, but $151 a month for a commuter rail pass for my nearest stop. Huh?
#17
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BOS
Posts: 3,534
People that have never bothered getting a CharlieCard are the only locals that really should be using the CharlieTickets. Even if you're a tourist a CharlieCard can be advantageous due to the reduced cost of bus/subway transfers in addition to the overall low fare. That said, if you're only going to be in town for a couple of days and don't plan on coming back any time soon I wouldn't waste time looking for a place to get a CharlieCard and just stick with the ticket.
#18
In memoriam
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IAD, BOS, PVD
Programs: UA, US, AS, Marriott, Radisson, Hilton
Posts: 7,203
The plan was to phase out free distribution of the cards and offer them
for sale (the way many cities do, including Washington DC and Singapore)
or for residents only by application (Christchurch). I don't know when if
ever this scheme will be implemented.
for sale (the way many cities do, including Washington DC and Singapore)
or for residents only by application (Christchurch). I don't know when if
ever this scheme will be implemented.
#19
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 52
What bothers me the most about this system is the inconsistency. I live off the Green C-Line and there are no machines to even buy a charlieticket. I try to plan ahead when we have visitors to save my guests from the glaring looks one receives for paying cash on board.
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
Most Bostonians aren't hit with the extra 18%, but speaking of being up in arms - a 3% or so city income tax as levied by NYC doesn't bother you????? You pick your battles. Apparently New Yorkers are content with their city incoime tax, Bostonians will settle for the 18% MBTA surcharge. Why don't New Yorkers riot over the income tax? I just don't get it.
Originally Posted by Lurker1999
You did the right thing to ask for the CharlieCard. That female guard was just being a thug. I should point out that MBTA does not have "security guards" per say only employees and there is also MBTA aka Transit Police. You likely encountered an employee on a power trip.
People that have never bothered getting a CharlieCard are the only locals that really should be using the CharlieTickets. Even if you're a tourist a CharlieCard can be advantageous due to the reduced cost of bus/subway transfers in addition to the overall low fare. That said, if you're only going to be in town for a couple of days and don't plan on coming back any time soon I wouldn't waste time looking for a place to get a CharlieCard and just stick with the ticket.
Originally Posted by violist
The plan was to phase out free distribution of the cards and offer them for sale (the way many cities do, including Washington DC and Singapore) or for residents only by application (Christchurch). I don't know when if ever this scheme will be implemented.
As for Boston, did the city gov't wonks change their minds regarding charging for the plastic cards? The cards are being phased out, when will they phase in only one price list?
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Worcester, MA, BOS, PVD, BDL, MHT, ??ORH??
Programs: Delta Platinum, HHonors Diamond, PC Platinum
Posts: 11,928
You don't get it? Well the ny city tax applies to all residents; you can't bypass it if you happen to be lucky enough to have been given a "bypass the city tax" plastic card. Why is it so hard for people to understand that the concept that having two payment tracks based on having the luck of someone giving you a cheaper option is bizarre. Also, how are your property taxes in MA? In NYC, property taxes are remarkably low. That right there makes up for city income tax. But then again, I'm not sure what a universal city income tax has to do with a Boston train system which has two different price schemes depending upon if you're lucky enough to get a plastic card.
I have no problem with being upset to be charged the higher price for the ticket. You should be upset, especially since it seems so capricious, but to say New Yorkers wouldn't put up with it is silly. I can assure you there is no huge movement to overthrow the MBTA fare structure.
Speaking of fare structures, if you drove to Boston recently via the Pike, you paid a toll, but since I have a fastpass device, I get a reduced price and I can deduct the expense from my state income tax. That said, people who drive into Boston from the North or South do not pay this onerous toll, so people who live west of Boston subsidize the rest of the commuters and pay a larger portion of the Big Dig, but there is no tea party going on. For the pittance this would save me personally, it is just not worth the fight.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,249
There's no reason for this to be yet another NY vs. Boston battle. (After all, we know how that will come out. Just look who won the World Series, after all! )
I've done a little bit of research, and it seem that the MBTA's plan was/is to incent people to use the CharlieCard because it will allow the MBTA to operate more efficiently by, among other things, (1) capturing data about passenger's travel patters and (2) allowing for more efficient ways for people to pay their fares, such as by reloading your card over the internet or providing for automatic reloading when the card runs out.
I honestly don't think anyone in either Boston or NY would object to the fare difference on this basis. (It's the exact same theory that is used in NY and Boston to provide discounted tolls for EZ Pass and FastLane users.) To the extent there's been negative publicity -- and I think it would be the same in NY -- it is that privacy advocates are not happy with the amount of personal data that the MBTA is able to capture using these cards.
I've done a little bit of research, and it seem that the MBTA's plan was/is to incent people to use the CharlieCard because it will allow the MBTA to operate more efficiently by, among other things, (1) capturing data about passenger's travel patters and (2) allowing for more efficient ways for people to pay their fares, such as by reloading your card over the internet or providing for automatic reloading when the card runs out.
I honestly don't think anyone in either Boston or NY would object to the fare difference on this basis. (It's the exact same theory that is used in NY and Boston to provide discounted tolls for EZ Pass and FastLane users.) To the extent there's been negative publicity -- and I think it would be the same in NY -- it is that privacy advocates are not happy with the amount of personal data that the MBTA is able to capture using these cards.
#23
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA
Programs: UA Silver, Southwest A-List, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 818
Analise, I hope its ok to slightly steal this thread on a related question?
So, I'm doing a 3-Day trip to Boston in January and figure that my best bet will be a Week Link Pass. Does that require a Charlie Card or is it a Charlie Ticket (or for that matter just some kind of regular ticket)? If the latter, can I purchase it from Logan? (The site makes reference to Purchase a pass at over 500 in-station fare vending machines or retail sales locations. )
So, I'm doing a 3-Day trip to Boston in January and figure that my best bet will be a Week Link Pass. Does that require a Charlie Card or is it a Charlie Ticket (or for that matter just some kind of regular ticket)? If the latter, can I purchase it from Logan? (The site makes reference to Purchase a pass at over 500 in-station fare vending machines or retail sales locations. )
#24
Senior Moderator and Moderator: American AAdvantage & TravelBuzz
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 10,419
You can load a Weekly Pass onto both the CharlieCard or a CharlieTicket. (If you don't already have a CharlieCard, then don't worry about it. It's not any more expensive to load a Weekly Pass onto a CharlieTicket.) You can buy your Week LinkPass at any of the vending machines. Just follow the directions on the screen for buying a pass, and it'll dispense a paper CharlieTicket that you will scan each time you take the subway or bus. Just don't lose it!
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
I don't think anyone has answered this one yet. Apologies if I missed an answer as I read through the thread.
Charlie was a fictional character in "The MTA Song," also known as "Charlie on the MTA." ("MTA" stood for Metropolitan Transit Authority, the predecessor of today's Mass. Bay Transit Authority or MBTA.) It was written for the 1948 mayoral campaign of Walter O'Brien. It was made famous by the Kingston Trio about ten years later, with the name changed to George O'Brien to avoid political problems.
Charlie was a poor chap who got on a train for the usual fare of 10¢, unaware that he'd also have to pay the new exit fare of 5¢ later. (The MTA instituted this scheme so as not to have to modify its toll collection machines.) As the song ends he's condemned to ride the train forever, with his wife handing him a sandwich each day as the train goes through the Scollay Square (now Government Center, since 1960s urban renewal tore down Scollay Square) station. (The song doesn't explain why she couldn't hand him a nickel too.) The only way to get Charlie off the MTA is to vote for O'Brien, who would repeal the fare increase. Unfortunately for Charlie, but perhaps fortunately for the solvency of Boston-area rapid transit, he lost.
Charlie was a fictional character in "The MTA Song," also known as "Charlie on the MTA." ("MTA" stood for Metropolitan Transit Authority, the predecessor of today's Mass. Bay Transit Authority or MBTA.) It was written for the 1948 mayoral campaign of Walter O'Brien. It was made famous by the Kingston Trio about ten years later, with the name changed to George O'Brien to avoid political problems.
Charlie was a poor chap who got on a train for the usual fare of 10¢, unaware that he'd also have to pay the new exit fare of 5¢ later. (The MTA instituted this scheme so as not to have to modify its toll collection machines.) As the song ends he's condemned to ride the train forever, with his wife handing him a sandwich each day as the train goes through the Scollay Square (now Government Center, since 1960s urban renewal tore down Scollay Square) station. (The song doesn't explain why she couldn't hand him a nickel too.) The only way to get Charlie off the MTA is to vote for O'Brien, who would repeal the fare increase. Unfortunately for Charlie, but perhaps fortunately for the solvency of Boston-area rapid transit, he lost.
Mike
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,249
I remember when I was a kid the very first time I rode the Red Line out to Quincy (where you could catch a bus to take you to Paragon Park at Nantasket Beach!) and having to pay another fare to exit the station. Presumably if I didn't have the extra dime, I could've reboarded a train and ridden back to Boston, where I could exit without paying an extra fare. I also seem to recall this scheme on the Green Line. Didn't you have to pay an extra quarter to exit the Riverside Line if you got off beyond a certain point? (My recollection is that, as a kid, my fare was a dime no matter what, so I was not obligated to pay the extra fare. But I think adults did.)
#27
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ayrshire, and sometimes Massachusetts
Programs: NW, DL
Posts: 135
Ah Blumie, you're making my eyes misty with memories of misspent youthful days at Paragon Park and Nantasket beach.....
Yeah, you used to also have to pay extra at Quincy Center before Braintree was built.
Yeah, you used to also have to pay extra at Quincy Center before Braintree was built.
#28
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
I've done a little bit of research, and it seem that the MBTA's plan was/is to incent people to use the CharlieCard because it will allow the MBTA to operate more efficiently by, among other things, (1) capturing data about passenger's travel patters and (2) allowing for more efficient ways for people to pay their fares, such as by reloading your card over the internet or providing for automatic reloading when the card runs out.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY (finally); previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM; BA GLD
Posts: 17,249
Because at the end of the day, the MBTA just is not particularly well run. People in NY like to complain about the MTA, but IME the MTA is far better run than is the MBTA.