"Going postal"
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Oregon (DL and Marr Lifetime plat. etc.)
Posts: 1,273
"Going postal"
First, with all deference to the generally great employees of the USPS, I use this as a generic term to represent day traders etc. that go ballistic and start shooting coworkers and customers.
The question is, how long will it be, if ever, before one of the National Guard types develops a brain tumor or just a bad attitude, and starts shooting??? What precautions are being taken?
Do they really need those automatic weapons? Unless they're expecting an armed brigade storming Security, wouldn't pistols allow them to cope with most any contingency?
I sure hope that I'm worried about nothing, but this happens often enough in the outside world that I hope that somebody has at least considered the possibility in Airports.
The question is, how long will it be, if ever, before one of the National Guard types develops a brain tumor or just a bad attitude, and starts shooting??? What precautions are being taken?
Do they really need those automatic weapons? Unless they're expecting an armed brigade storming Security, wouldn't pistols allow them to cope with most any contingency?
I sure hope that I'm worried about nothing, but this happens often enough in the outside world that I hope that somebody has at least considered the possibility in Airports.
#2
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,957
I think this is a silly worry. You could say the same about any Police Officer or anyone else in a similar position that is legally armed.
#3
Used to be Sydneysider
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
i agree... they could do just about as much damage with a 9mm beretta as with their M-16s.
and please don't say "M-16's are automatic and fire more bullets". the rate of fire on an automatic rifle is so high that you might actually get less casualties than with a handgun. this is because the bullet dispersement range would be narrow, whereas with a sidearm you can more easily fire in a variety of directions.
and please don't say "M-16's are automatic and fire more bullets". the rate of fire on an automatic rifle is so high that you might actually get less casualties than with a handgun. this is because the bullet dispersement range would be narrow, whereas with a sidearm you can more easily fire in a variety of directions.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
Uhh, I'd content that one can do a lot more damage with an M-16 than a 9mm 92F. Rate of fire and accuracy come to mind, here.
Which might explain why they are carrying the M-16s in some places to begin with.
------------------
Saving the world, one clue at a time.
Which might explain why they are carrying the M-16s in some places to begin with.
------------------
Saving the world, one clue at a time.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,763
At one point someone on here said that the guns aren't even loaded. Not sure if that's true.
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
d
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
d
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,811
Be aware that the 55 grain 5.56 mm full metal jacket rounds the M-16s fire are very high velocity and tend to ricochet (off walls, bones, and other hard surfaces ) a lot. I think the M-16s these days fire 2-3 round bursts instead full automatic. That'd cause more casualties than the slow 9mm rounds the Berattas (or the typical sub machine guns such as the Heckler & Kochs).
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,811
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Doppy:
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
</font>
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
</font>
#8
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,040
I have a friend in the natl guard who is a lawyer who got called up for airport duty. Its very scary to think of this guy with a gun. Anyway, his unit was issued M-16's and ammunition but they must keep the ammo in a belt pocket--not allowed to load their weapons until needed.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: Lifetime: UA Gold, AA Gold, & Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,352
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Doppy:
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
</font>
Go to a German airport. There are ten times as many military type guards carrying loaded weapons there. How many of them shoot up the airport for no reason?
</font>
#10
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Silver / Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 35,681
I agree with Dudster. Other examples where elite troops are displayed with full "battle gear" that come to mind are HKG and SIN. In both airports they are walking around with automatic weapons.
[This message has been edited by Gaucho100K (edited 02-18-2002).]
[This message has been edited by Gaucho100K (edited 02-18-2002).]
#11
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Silver / Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 35,681
(duplicate post)
[This message has been edited by Gaucho100K (edited 02-18-2002).]
[This message has been edited by Gaucho100K (edited 02-18-2002).]
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,074
But you all are missing something here. If you have watched any movies you should know that those weapons will not hit the good guys. You now the movies, 30 guys with automatic weapons can not hit the good guy. He pulls out a saturday night special and picks them off one by one.
See, there is a plan!
#13
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Escondido CA USA
Programs: AS, UA, HY, Hil, Merr
Posts: 3,207
Nat Guard does not normally train with pistols, so this is not a short term option. M-16's tend to fire up rather than across unless done professionally. The risk of killing a bystander is quite low, especially when compared with a hijacker crashing a plane into a building. Probably better things to worry about.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
For what it's worth, the M9/92Fs I've seen on the National Guard in various airports seem to be loaded (at least in the sense that there appears from a cursory glance to be a round in the chamber causing the indicatior "bump" to be "bumped up."
Disclaimer: my 92 is a 92G Elite-II, so the stainless slide allows easier viewing of the loaded chamber bump.
------------------
Saving the world, one clue at a time.
Disclaimer: my 92 is a 92G Elite-II, so the stainless slide allows easier viewing of the loaded chamber bump.
------------------
Saving the world, one clue at a time.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Anywhere but a middle in coach!
Posts: 465
The NG personnel at ORD do not carry M-16s, they only have a sidearm.