Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Have you started flying less?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Have you started flying less?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 9:17 pm
  #16  
Original Poster
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by chexfan:
Q: Have You Started Flying Less?
A: Nope. I think now is the time to support your airline. 80,358 miles in the air for chexfan since 9/11.
</font>

good for you, chexfan. but let me ask you this, would you be dining at your favorite restaurant if they made it similarly difficult to get to the table? or getting you car serviced? i don't fly to "support an airline", as you put it. i fly because i need an easy way to get from point A to point B in a reasonable period of time, at a reasonable price, and without an unreasonable amount of hassle. the same standards i apply to just about any consumer product i purchase.
duxfan is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 9:45 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Diamond; Marriott Bonvoy - Platinum
Posts: 14,286
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Comicwoman:
I wonder when the day will come when we will have to put everything into our checked luggage and fly in airline issued paper jumpsuits with travel socks.</font>
I heard a rumor of August 15th -- but the source wasn't completely reliable!
Points Scrounger is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 9:58 pm
  #18  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA LT PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,567
why don't they just start using that full body scanning system from total recall? the technology must exist by now...and the long waits would be eliminated.
broadwayblue is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 10:54 pm
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: source of weird and eccentric ideas
Posts: 40,035
total recall the movie??

I thought that was fiction
richard is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 4:03 am
  #20  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Represa CA
Programs: Hilton LTD, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Amb/ LTTE, AA LTP, Avis PC, National EE, Seabourn DE
Posts: 3,109
[QUOTE]Originally posted by texana:

Traveling light and zipping around isn't fun any more.

Ditto
hedoman is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 8:36 am
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,469
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by duxfan:
i fly because i need an easy way to get from point A to point B in a reasonable period of time, at a reasonable price, and without an unreasonable amount of hassle.</font>
Fair enough. In my case it's easier to get from the west coast to the east coast by flying than any other way.

chexfan is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 8:48 am
  #22  
Original Poster
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
i understand your point, chexfan. there are still places that I am going to HAVE to fly to. but until recently there were places that I CHOSE to fly to, when I could have driven. The hassles and extra time it now takes for a short flight makes me reconsider what I CHOOSE to fly.

Let me give you an example in your area. Prior to the last few weeks, I would have flown SEA-PDX for a quick biz trip. Now I'd drive the 3 hrs each way. It takes no less time to drive now, and I avoid the agravation of have my briefcase inspected for needles, etc....
duxfan is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 9:52 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,405

As stated many times, the choice to drive vs. fly for 2-5 hour trips is swinging towards driving. Coast to coast is another story. But, of those people that used to take multiple trips in a month, how many now take less and consolidate them, since they lose so many hours in the process? And how many had a trip that was not REQUIRED, but instead was a good idea, then they opted to just not bother? Airlines get less business, especially the high end fares. Less business gets accomplished. Trickle down economy continues.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 10:03 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,469
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by duxfan:
Let me give you an example in your area. Prior to the last few weeks, I would have flown SEA-PDX for a quick biz trip. Now I'd drive the 3 hrs each way.</font>
I completely agree. Your example is a very legit one for the industry as a whole. But then again, you can use the special security line in SEA if you are flying to PDX.

So to get back on topic, due to 9/11 I have missed one r/t and that was from EWR to SEA on 9/14 (and the subsequent return). This has amounted to about 12 trans-cons from SEA to BDL or EWR (most w/ a 3-5 day advance purchase), a trip to SFO and a run to SIN.
chexfan is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 10:09 am
  #25  
Original Poster
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
exactly, my long haul stuff won't change much at all. i'll still need to go to europe, so i have no real option. doesn't look like i'll be going back to khazakstan or turkmenistan in 2002 (that was an experience, lemme tell ya!), but hopefully i can get my contacts to meet me in London instead when I'm over there. But until a more "common sense" approach to security is taken, I'm going to avoid the rubber gloves whenever I can.
duxfan is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 10:12 am
  #26  
Original Poster
40 Nights
40 Countries Visited
2M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: Choice Plat, Marriott Lifetime Gold, National Exec Elite, Spirit Gold
Posts: 3,135
no stress -

do you think less business will really get accomplished, or will people look more local for both customers and suppliers?

i know i'm looking at a smaller catch area to find new customers. i might have to work a little harder, drive a little more, but in the long run it might pay off into more business without as much travel.
duxfan is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 3:17 pm
  #27  
R&R
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am seriously considering 'stop flying more'! After the Paris AA fiasco, and getting searched and exrayed the past 24 hours on a return flight, the fun is gone.
 
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 3:23 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,405
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by duxfan:
no stress - do you think less business will really get accomplished, or will people look more local for both customers and suppliers?
i know i'm looking at a smaller catch area to find new customers. i might have to work a little harder, drive a little more, but in the long run it might pay off into more business without as much travel.
</font>
In some cases, you are correct. Sometimes we think there is more business in ANOTHER city, and drive by the obvious down the street. But, in some cases, you can only do business with certain companies in remote cities. Quite often, especially with the bigger deals, national accounts type stuff.
NoStressHere is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 3:32 pm
  #29  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: dallas texas usa
Programs: aa plt 4.9MM LTAC
Posts: 14,828
because i only fly for personal reasons, there should not be any reason to stop. however, i've delayed a trip to antarctia that i wanted to do to see how this weekend trip dfw-lga will come out. how much hassle!
clacko is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2001 | 4:16 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: USA
Programs: AA - Hilton
Posts: 1,103
My experiences since 9/11 have not been that bad. A couple of long waits at SEA. STL was pretty hienous last Friday. Overall, I still enjoy the experience. I fly 1st or business a lot and have been AA elite for several years. I suppose my experience is just destined to be good.

The flying will probably increase next year. With customers in Europe, Southwest Asia, and Australia, I just have to go.

While going, I have to stay positive and enjoy it to the best of my ability. I am not sure I feel more, or less, safe. Just more aware of the threat, perhaps.
FlyAAway is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.