Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 11, 2015, 11:49 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: drewguy
If you've never gone through this process read this before posting!
Note: Please consider that with high probability, United is monitoring this thread, so please pay attention on what you post!

DOT Investigation UpdatesNews Media Updates:

-------

According to USA Today, Ben Mutzabaugh:
United is voiding the bookings of several thousand individuals who were attempting to take advantage of an error a third-party software provider made when it applied an incorrect currency exchange rate, despite United having properly filed its fares. Most of these bookings were for travel originating in the United Kingdom, and the level of bookings made with Danish Kroner as the local currency was significantly higher than normal during the limited period that customers made these bookings.
Note that United has also accidentally cancelled "legitimate" tickets paid for in USD, purchased in USD from LHR... Please check your other tickets if purchased today to ensure they were not unilaterally cancelled.

However, there is no chance at all that you can have your tickets re-instated if you complain to DOT on the basis of DOT rule § 399.88:
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.
Form for filing DOT complaint. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.

Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.


Tips for DOT Complaint:
  • File on DOT for every ticket number affected.
  • If you have one reservation with four people traveling (four tickets) file 4 DOT complaints, one per ticket.
  • If you have separate reservations, file a DOT complaint for each.
  • The DOT complaint website may take several minutes to load, depending on demand.
  • When you go to upload a file, be careful as it will reset all your radio buttons. So, if you want a copy of the complaint, make sure you double check that "Yes" is still selected before submitting, especially if you upload a file.

Template For Complaint:
United has unilaterally cancelled my ticket without my consent.

Facts:
1. The ticket was ticketed (had a ticket number).
2. I received a confirmation number, ticket number, and emails stating both
3. The ticket was paid for and my credit card charged.

United must reinstate the ticket within its original cabin. This trip is for travel TO the United States.

At no time during the booking process was any other fare than the Danish Krone equivalent displayed. As a reasonable, prudent consumer, I believed I was paying the price displayed to me on the website. United never sent or displayed the equivalent fare in any other currency.

Trip Details
Ticket #: 016XXXXXXXXXX
PNR: XXXXXX
Routing: LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL

Attachments: Attached is a document showing the ticket, routing, and providing proof that the reservation was ticketed.

Filename: Cancelled - UA Reservation - LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL - XXXXXX - 016XXXXXXXXXX.pdf

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant Law |
| http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/399.88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
§ 399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant FAQ |
| http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/rules/EAPP_2_FAQ.pdf |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Does the prohibition on post-purchase price increases in section 399.88(a) apply in the situation where a carrier mistakenly offers an airfare due to a computer problem or human error and a consumer purchases the ticket at that fare before the carrier is able to fix the mistake?

Section 399.88(a) states that it is an unfair and deceptive practice for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, or of a tour or tour component that includes scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation to a consumer after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of a government-imposed tax or fee and only if the passenger is advised of a possible increase before purchasing a ticket. A purchase occurs when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer. Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a “mistake.”
-----
Tips for retrieving your ticket number:
  1. paste(right click copy link location first) following link into your web browser
  2. change XXXXXX next to COPNR= for your reservation number and LASTNAME next to LN= for you SURNAME
  3. go to the webpage address you have just created

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...NRCD=2/11/2015


Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX View Post
R E L A X

Breathe deep.

Congrats on all who got in.

Now comes the fun part.

1. Discovery - mistake fare is posted on FT. Novices frantically checks how much vacation time they have and if the dates of availability mesh with their schedules. Experienced FTers just book it and worry about contacting spouses or their boss later. Word spreads like wildfire.

2. Excitement - Tickets purchased, confirmation emails received and dates of travel shared with other FTers. Discussions of what to see and do and where to stay crop up in other threads. Novices contact source to change seats or inquire about upgrades, Seasoned FTers sit back and enjoy reading the discussion threads.

3. Stress Stage 1 - Concern over paper ticket delivery - Novices Frantically check otheFedEx website every few hours, constant monitoring of driveway for FedEx truck. Seasoned FT veterans sit back and relax.

4. Glee and happiness - Paper tickets in hand, vacation request submitted, spouses finally informed, hotel reservations made and bragging to friends and co-workers begins. Both novices and experts get very excited.

5. Stress Stage 2 - Rumors of fare not being honored, discussion threads about the airline and ticketing agency ensue. Rumors crop up like crabgrass at this stage. Many FTers begin to worry excessively about whether or not the trip will happen. Novices make non-refundable and financial committments to their trip. Seasoned FTers make mixed drinks (and maybe a sandwich) and is patient.

6. Reality Check - Accurate information is obtained - usually takes place a week to 10 days after mistake fare is published. Confirmed information from the source as to whether or not tickets will be honored.

7a. Pure Joy (Icelandair style- Fare is Honored) - Lots of happy people, FT threads on shared information regarding hotels, restaurants, tours, etc. Jealousy from others sets in. First "FT guinea pigs" embark, post confirmation threads that all is ok.


7b Hostile Feelings (Copa Airlines Style - fare is not honored) - Many angry and disappointed FTers. Refunds are issued. Novices have multiple discussion threads of lawsuits and hostile correspondence, FT pros mutter "c'est la vie" and look for the next fare mistake.

8a Success (Honored) - Trip Report thread becomes very active


Freedom of Information Act Request
File #2015-147, Office of the Secretary of Transportation - Receipt acknowledged 3/13/15

http://www.dot.gov/individuals/foia/office-secretary-foia-information

Relevant excerpt from my request on 2/24/15. There no need for multiple requests for the same thing, though feel free to request more or different information obviously. I'll post any updates as I get them.

"Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S. C. subsection 552, I am requesting access to any and all records of correspondence, including electronic, between anyone working for, or on the behalf of, United Airlines and its subsidiaries, and with anyone working for, or on the behalf of, the Department of Transportation; specifically this would include only the date range beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015.

In addition, I am requesting access to any and all internal records and correspondence in relation to coming to the decision made on February 23rd, 2015 regarding the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings Determination Regarding United Airlines Mistaken Fare, with the exception of any of the consumer submitted complaints via phone, email, website, or letter. Specifically, this would be any records beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015."
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:16 pm
  #2821  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Programs: Asiana Diamond, HH Diamond, QR Platinum
Posts: 57
My 2 DKK worth

Originally Posted by zkzkz
Not much. Once upon a time airlines handed you a piece of paper that was your ticket. That was like a bus ticket or train ticket, it was an physical good which you could exchange for services.

When they introduced etickets there was some fear that consumers would be afraid to trust them since they were paying thousands for a virtual entity kept in the airline's computer which could in theory be revoked at any time. So airlines made all kinds of promises to consumers and the government that etickets would be treated just like physical paper tickets and would never be repriced or canceled once purchased. That's the origin of the DOT rules and why they differ from other contracts.

Now that etickets are universal and everyone's comfortable with them the airlines want to walk back all those promises and treat tickets like contracts for future services rather than like physical tickets like they promised.
I also think DoT should rule based on the absent of technology, as if this happen in the old days. Let me explain. If this was a foreign currency glitch like United claimed, what would of happened in the old days of paper tickets? I am guessing I would need to contact a TA within Denmark in order to issue the paper tickets. I would give them my credit card, I may also give them my address to validate my credit card (they would not care where I live, right?), as long as the credit card was authorized and they get paid in DKK. All the TA cared for was receiving the booking fee (which we also got charged in the form of 40 DKK per ticket by United). Once the paper ticket was issued by the TA, I would have a valid ticket to travel. The transaction is fully completed. Someone please correct me if I have the above scenario incorrect or just too simplistic.

Now, fast forward to present day. Just because United has the ability to cancel these tickets, as all tickets are e-tickets now, they have taken advantage of the system and technology. When I book on the United.com website, I am booking with a virtual United travel agent (no matter where I am located). If I book my ticket with the United Denmark website, is it not I am booking with a virtual United travel agent located in Denmark? If they really wanted to enforce my geographic location, then they should of performed a reverse IP address lookup to ensure I am located in Denmark, or wherever the fares apply. So for those who said the tickets were purchased in fraud, please think about that for a moment (United has the ability to restrict the sale of those tickets - but they did not). There is no fraud in involved. If United wanted to, they can with technology restrict the purchase of those tickets with geo-location checking. Or perhaps just default to the departure country currency like most other airlines out there. This is your error United, don't deflect the problem to a third party!
Backbencher is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:16 pm
  #2822  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by yus
The strange thing is, no one who calls choosing Denmark as a billing country fraud can answer my simple question: I am EU resident, my billing country does not exist on UA, what I supposed to do according to your logic?
Call UA web support and book the ticket.

Your situation is different from the people who chose Denmark as their CC's billing address country even though their country is available in the system. They knowingly tried to game the system, and now claim that they didn't do anything wrong.
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:18 pm
  #2823  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London / Los Angeles
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, BA Silver
Posts: 1,631
It's not just for a mistake fare, but also the legit promotional fares that UA have published from CPH and DUB lately. In order to book those, people still had to change their billing country to either Denmark or Ireland. I personally think United is at fault here for emplyoing these price discrimination tactics.
Well I'm not familiar with those fares but yes if United is deliberately advertising fares to some EU residents and not others, then that does sound like price discrimination.

I'm not a laywer, like I said it just sounds to me that for it to be considered a deliberate act of price discrimination, there would have to be intent, and in this specific instance, there was no intent to offer this fare to any country, it was a mistake.

I am not against people trying to get these tickets honoured, but I just think this particular argument is weak!
Enigma368 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:18 pm
  #2824  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: BOS
Posts: 814
FOX Business Network's Gerri Willis says United States Dept. of Transportation has told them they are investigating United over this... https://twitter.com/GerriWillisFBN/s...52632989044737
xSTRIKEx6864 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:19 pm
  #2825  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: TK Elite Plus, SAS EBG, QR Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,297
Originally Posted by Backbencher
This is your error United, don't deflect the problem to a third party!
^ +1
LH4116 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:19 pm
  #2826  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,310
Originally Posted by Backbencher
Just because United has the ability to cancel these tickets, as all tickets are e-tickets now, they have taken advantage of the system and technology.
So all those who booked weren't taking advantage of the system and technology?
Jesperss is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:20 pm
  #2827  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by nyjoe4
The thing is, there is nothing to suggest from the comments of many of these people that they lied.
They put "Denmark" as their CC billing address country. They lied in order to game the system and take advantage of a glitch.
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:20 pm
  #2828  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Dublin
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by xSTRIKEx6864
FOX Business Network's Gerri Willis says United States Dept. of Transportation has told them they are investigating United over this... https://twitter.com/GerriWillisFBN/s...52632989044737
Well spotted, thanks for sharing.
run44 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:20 pm
  #2829  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purgatory
Programs: Too many to list. Status is a half dozen.
Posts: 9,235
Just checking in. Have we reached Godwin level yet?
ArizonaGuy is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:22 pm
  #2830  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Programs: UA PP, AA, DL, BA, CX, SPG, HHonors
Posts: 2,002
Originally Posted by xSTRIKEx6864
FOX Business Network's Gerri Willis says United States Dept. of Transportation has told them they are investigating United over this... https://twitter.com/GerriWillisFBN/s...52632989044737
Lovely. ^ People kept saying "UA must've consulted DOT before doing X Y and Z" clearly just made it up.

Maybe the compromise is that UA will reinstate everyone but only fly them in Y.
787fan is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:22 pm
  #2831  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
Originally Posted by as219
Nope.

From UA's cancellation email, again...
UA's stated position has nothing to do with anyone lying and everything to do with the error made by the third-party exchange rate provider. The difference between this error and previous errors is that previous errors didn't involve UA filing correct prices while third parties mucked it up.
If people hadn't lied about their CC billing country, they would't have been able to take advantage of the glitch.
The difference between this error and previous errors is that previous errors didn't require people to lie in order to game the system. To each his own, I guess...
UA1K_no_more is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:23 pm
  #2832  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by nyjoe4
The thing is, there is nothing to suggest from the comments of many of these people that they lied. They simply used the website's functionality to purchase a ticket in a foreign country. The billing address, if entered, didn't prevent them from purchasing the ticket. The credit card company did not reject the charge. The airline issued a ticket, charged them for it, and all would have been fine IF the fare had been acceptable to the airline.

Try it today - buy a non-mistake fare employing the same method, and see if United reneges on the contract. I guarantee you that they will not. And if you were to call them 48 hours later and say "I mistakenly bought my ticket in Denmark, and I want to cancel it with no charge because that is not the country of my billing address", they would laugh, and tell you to take a hike.
Touche!

This is absolutely cracking me up!

In my case I could say"I now realize that United loaded the wrong country in the billing address field when I opted to view the pricing in a foreign currency ; please refund my ticket ..."

Last edited by Sfuzzi; Feb 12, 2015 at 12:31 pm Reason: Can't stop laughing
Sfuzzi is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:24 pm
  #2833  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,146
Originally Posted by ArizonaGuy
Just checking in. Have we reached Godwin level yet?
^ ^ ^

Getting close, I suspect ... but the restraint so far has been impressive
T8191 is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:25 pm
  #2834  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LHR
Programs: M&M,HH Gold,Accor Plat.,Priority Club Plat. Ambassador,Club Carlson Gold,Marriott Gold,GHA Plat.
Posts: 1,627
is unuseful to discuss about the billing address since everybody can change it easily , simply with a phon call to the credit card issuer, asking to send the billing address to their address in DK.

Furthermore i don't see any difference between the UA glitch and the AZ glitch: in both cases people went to another country website, using a promo code that was supposed to be valid only for the ones which live in JP.
At the end AZ honored the fare. But...the DOT didn't judge on the case.
Paul4Travel is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2015, 12:26 pm
  #2835  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: BWI<MCI< PHL<DEN<SCL<EZE<CHO<PHL<ABE
Programs: UA Silver / FA
Posts: 939
Some people think it's unethical booking these, some people do not.
Some people changed their CC billing country, some people were not prompted.
Some people think it's not smart to submit DoT claim for this, some people think it is.
Some people are mad, some are not.

Did I miss anyone?
Tblack15 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.