Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > Midwest
Reload this Page >

ORD to Get Third Runway by October

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ORD to Get Third Runway by October

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 11:32 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York and Vienna
Programs: PA WorldPass Platinum, AA, DL, LH. GHA Black, SPG and HHonors Gold
Posts: 3,872
ORD to Get Third Runway by October

Since United is the largest operator at ORD, I thought a discussion of the new runway's impact on ORD flying might be in order. Clearly this should relieve a lot of congestion and delays. (I had no idea that ORD is now planning for a total of 8 runways, however, until I saw the O'Hare Modernization Program's website.)

Chicago-OHare New Runway Set to Open Next October
Chicagos OHare International Airport will soon be able to complete the construction of a new runway, Runway 10C/28C, which should be operational by October 2013. The new runway, which is part of the $8 billion OHare Modernization Program, is being built partially on land formerly owned by the St. John United Church of Christ in Bensenville. It is being designed to ...
<SNIP>

Last edited by jspira; Dec 30, 2012 at 12:07 am
jspira is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 11:46 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA EXP,2MM, DL Gold,Starwood PLT
Posts: 3,876
Originally Posted by jspira
Since United is the largest operator at ORD, I thought a discussion of the new runway's impact on ORD flying might be in order. Clearly this should relieve a lot of congestion and delays. I had no idea that ORD is now planning for a total of 8 runways, however, until I saw the O'Hare Modernization Program's website.

Chicago-OHare New Runway Set to Open Next October
It's bad reporting. Has noting to do with UA. it's the 3rd runway to either be built or extended as part of the the plan, not that ORD has 3 run ways. There is a 4th new one planned but not yet agreed upon.
grahampros is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 11:54 pm
  #3  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,175
FAA ORD airport runaway map
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 12:03 am
  #4  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA 1K, NW forever
Posts: 1,391
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
Why are the 3 parallel runways labeled 27R/L and 28, instead of 27R/L/C?
dfreeman02 is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 12:11 am
  #5  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 73,175
Originally Posted by dfreeman02
Why are the 3 parallel runways labeled 27R/L and 28, instead of 27R/L/C?
Some history on ORD runaways
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 9:14 pm
  #6  
glg
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, US
Posts: 2,210
Originally Posted by dfreeman02
Why are the 3 parallel runways labeled 27R/L and 28, instead of 27R/L/C?
Because there will eventually be 6 east/west runways. FAA allows the numbering like that to avoid confusion. The north set are numbered 9/27. L/R exist now, C in the future. The south set numbered 10/28, just one now, second will be done next year (it's the point of the article at the start of the thread), last one will be the last one done.

Same thing exists at other airports too. ATL has 2 8's, 2 9's and a 10 that are 9's. LAX has 2 6's and 2 7's that are 7's. DEN has 2 16's and 2 17's that are 17's *and* a 7 and an 8 that are both 8's.
glg is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2012 | 6:24 am
  #7  
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 962
As much as everyone thinks this runway will help a lot with delays and congestion, most of those issues went away when 27R was opened.

This runway was designed specifically for the Class VI aircraft (A380, 748) and currently the A380 is not authorized to operate to ORD yet. All the 748 operators are cargo and can use other runways but are restricted to taxiing outside the main terminal complex due to wingtip issues.

What will help is when the 3rd southern FAA tower is built. Then you can start looking at ORD as two separate airports. The Northern which will cover UA and the Southern which will cover AA. The Center FAA tower will handle clearance delivery, clearance and both inbound and outbound traffic.

There's some proposed taxiway construction planned for 2013 which will make some quality of life improvements near T5.
ords is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 5:45 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ORD
Programs: UA MM, AA PPro
Posts: 1,519
I'm actually bummed about 32L going away. Taxing from UA gates to 32L @ T10 is just about the shortest among major airports.
legalalien is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 4:16 am
  #9  
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 962
Originally Posted by legalalien
I'm actually bummed about 32L going away. Taxing from UA gates to 32L @ T10 is just about the shortest among major airports.
I agree but this should swing over to AA's side now if the taxiway construction between the end of the K finger and T5 takes place, there will be a nice straight path from T3 the 28's.

Basically it's removing the AA fuel farm and preplacing it with an angled taxiway that runs right to ZV.
ords is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2013 | 12:23 pm
  #10  
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: AA, UA, GE
Posts: 5,388
Originally Posted by ords
This runway was designed specifically for the Class VI aircraft (A380, 748) and currently the A380 is not authorized to operate to ORD yet. All the 748 operators are cargo and can use other runways but are restricted to taxiing outside the main terminal complex due to wingtip issues.

.
.
.

There's some proposed taxiway construction planned for 2013 which will make some quality of life improvements near T5.
Sorry to bump an older thread but I came across this doing a google search for updates on the OMP.

I saw on some of the FAA OMP data that 10C/28C was needed for B748/A388 flights. Does this (and the taxiway updates) need to be complete before LH can start flying the 748 into ORD for passenger service?
cheltzel is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2013 | 1:45 pm
  #11  
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 962
Originally Posted by cheltzel
Sorry to bump an older thread but I came across this doing a google search for updates on the OMP.

I saw on some of the FAA OMP data that 10C/28C was needed for B748/A388 flights. Does this (and the taxiway updates) need to be complete before LH can start flying the 748 into ORD for passenger service?
No, the issue with the LH748i is getting from T5 to T1. It appears the FAA will grant the waiver so look for it hopefully in August.

We already have the 748's operating into ORD already.
ords is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2013 | 5:01 pm
  #12  
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: AA, UA, GE
Posts: 5,388
Originally Posted by ords
No, the issue with the LH748i is getting from T5 to T1. It appears the FAA will grant the waiver so look for it hopefully in August.

We already have the 748's operating into ORD already.
I knw that the 748 freighters were already operating at ORD. I had read here and elsewhere that there was some issues with taxiways for the passenger flights. So when I saw the OMP schedule about taxiway improvements, I thought maybe that was it.

In any event, thanks much for the answer!!!
cheltzel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.