Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Digital Key For Wrong Room

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 11:51 am
  #16  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Originally Posted by pvn
Wow, this is crazy. Just a couple of questions

1) when you noticed the change, it sounds like you first tried to open your original room (and were unable) and then you tried to open the "new" room listed (and succeeded), is that right? was the "new" room occupied?

2) Did the hotel staff then check the original room for your bags?

3) Whose luggage did they think you were trying to steal?

4) was your original room re-assigned to a different guest?
Neither of the rooms were occupied. Apparently the hotel was rather unoccupied last night. They printed off a list of all King Rooms to check for the luggage. Everyone besides the loss prevention guy was very helpful and apologetic.

The hotel staff did check the orginal room room for the baggage after about 30 minutes. They were no longer in there. (I was with them when they did this) Im guessing housekeeping moved them or something.

The loss prevention guy basically said something to the effect of how do I know youre not trying to steal luggage and why would you access the wrong room?

By the end of this I felt like I was in a twilight zone episode! In chatting with a coworker today apparently they have her rental car to the wrong person last year. Ill be avoiding this hotel going forward.
trentryan is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 12:33 pm
  #17  
pvn
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MEM
Programs: Starbucks Green Card
Posts: 5,431
So where did they find the bags??? It sounds like they moved your bags and then tried to convince you that you were crazy to cover up their snafu.
pvn is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 2:48 pm
  #18  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: W29
Programs: It's Complicated...
Posts: 7,178
Originally Posted by NDDomer86
You don't trust Marriott's IT but you trust Hilton's?!?
Yes. Not saying that Hilton is very "progressive" in what they do but have never had as many problems as I have since staring to stay a Marriott hotels more.
mcgahat is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 2:55 pm
  #19  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: none
Posts: 1,680
So, when we finally get to the bottom of this, HOW MANY points should you get for compensation?. (This is FT, after all.)
Allan38103 is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 4:34 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,184
Originally Posted by trentryan
The loss prevention guy basically said something to the effect of “how do I know you’re not trying to steal luggage and why would you access the wrong room?”
I hope you specifically named him in the police report. I hope it's not part of a scam.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 5:59 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
I hope you specifically named him in the police report. I hope it's not part of a scam.
without being specific would there be contents of interest?

maybe there was more to this than seems apparent.
overdahill is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 7:28 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 51
Originally Posted by overdahill
without being specific would there be contents of interest?

maybe there was more to this than seems apparent.
Not particularly. I had a personal MacBook Pro, work laptop, an iPad Pro and a DSLR my my backpack. Nothing else particularly valuable.

My plan is to not make a fuss about it while I am staying here as I don't want the over aggressive loss prevention guy to come at me again. I'll be speaking to a manager on check out day for sure though.
trentryan is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 9:24 pm
  #23  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 278
Originally Posted by mcgahat
Yes. Not saying that Hilton is very "progressive" in what they do but have never had as many problems as I have since staring to stay a Marriott hotels more.
Hilton is capable of similar issues. For example, I've been given an already occupied room.

The real failure here isn't the key screwup. It's the recovery.

Losing the OP's luggage afterwards is pretty bad.

The LP Officer, on the other hand, rates somewhere between stupid (unable/unwilling to understand the situation, and accusing the OP of a scenario that makes no sense) and malicious (attacking a guest you've already screwed over makes it pretty clear you don't want their business). I wouldn't feel safe staying in a hotel that treated me like that, so I'd probably eat the cost and go somewhere else.
DJ_Iceman likes this.
mauve is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2018 | 10:28 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
May I suggest that sometimes tone gets lost in translation ....

The LP guy may have in-artfully been trying to say, i always have to do this, otherwise someone could be trying to steal luggage, not meaning to suggest you were trying to steal luggage.

Remember, My Cousin Vinnie? Tone can be misunderstood.

Seems to me the real issue is that they checked you into your room, you went into your room, and someone moved your luggage without telling you. That's way more significant than anything the LP guy said.
C17PSGR is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 8:31 am
  #25  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYZ
Programs: Ex-Bonvoyed, Hyatt, BR, BA
Posts: 1,724
Originally Posted by C17PSGR
May I suggest that sometimes tone gets lost in translation ....

The LP guy may have in-artfully been trying to say, i always have to do this, otherwise someone could be trying to steal luggage, not meaning to suggest you were trying to steal luggage.

Remember, My Cousin Vinnie? Tone can be misunderstood.

Seems to me the real issue is that they checked you into your room, you went into your room, and someone moved your luggage without telling you. That's way more significant than anything the LP guy said.
If Marriott's system glitched and showed the OPs room as checked out, it would be pretty reasonable for housekeeping to move the luggage when they see it in a (presumably) checked out room.
Dave510 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 8:42 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
Originally Posted by Dave510
If Marriott's system glitched and showed the OPs room as checked out, it would be pretty reasonable for housekeeping to move the luggage when they see it in a (presumably) checked out room.
Perhaps but one would think that having luggage in a checked out room would be a somewhat big deal in a mid-sized hotel like this. Also, that moving luggage would require security's involvement so they would know and OP wouldn't have had the disconnect issue with his luggage.

And on the give the LP guy a break for his comment (but not for not having any info on the missing luggage), I note that there are some hotel room luggage thefts in the news in SLC today. So, perhaps the LP had information being shared from other hotels about this issue.
C17PSGR is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 9:43 am
  #27  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,381
Originally Posted by Dave510
If Marriott's system glitched and showed the OPs room as checked out, it would be pretty reasonable for housekeeping to move the luggage when they see it in a (presumably) checked out room.
It's completely unreasonable for housekeeping to move luggage out of a room and not have it *very* *well* *documented* and readily accessible to the front desk. Instead of accusing the OP, the security person should have immediately found out who else had been in the room after OP, and been on the phone with that person finding out where the luggage was taken and why it wasn't documented properly. And apologizing profusely.

And it's unreasonable for Marriott's system to glitch without any trace of the previous room that the OP not just had on his screen, but actually accessed. I'd want to hear the GM say that he was angry about this and had been working with Marriott IT to figure out what happened and escalate a fix to top levels. It just shouldn't be possible for this to happen without a trace.
trentryan likes this.
jmastron is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 12:52 pm
  #28  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYZ
Programs: Ex-Bonvoyed, Hyatt, BR, BA
Posts: 1,724
Originally Posted by C17PSGR
Perhaps but one would think that having luggage in a checked out room would be a somewhat big deal in a mid-sized hotel like this. Also, that moving luggage would require security's involvement so they would know and OP wouldn't have had the disconnect issue with his luggage.

And on the give the LP guy a break for his comment (but not for not having any info on the missing luggage), I note that there are some hotel room luggage thefts in the news in SLC today. So, perhaps the LP had information being shared from other hotels about this issue.
Originally Posted by jmastron
It's completely unreasonable for housekeeping to move luggage out of a room and not have it *very* *well* *documented* and readily accessible to the front desk. Instead of accusing the OP, the security person should have immediately found out who else had been in the room after OP, and been on the phone with that person finding out where the luggage was taken and why it wasn't documented properly. And apologizing profusely.

And it's unreasonable for Marriott's system to glitch without any trace of the previous room that the OP not just had on his screen, but actually accessed. I'd want to hear the GM say that he was angry about this and had been working with Marriott IT to figure out what happened and escalate a fix to top levels. It just shouldn't be possible for this to happen without a trace.
Make no mistake, I wholly agree that the hotel handled it poorly (especially the security person who accused OP; assuming the guest is guilty in a stressful situation for the OP is the worst way to handle this situation). The hotel shouldn't be confused as to where the luggage is, assuming housekeeping moved it.

I'm merely saying housekeeping SHOULD move the luggage to a safe location if they see one in a checked out room (but of course they should first inform security and document it).
Dave510 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 6:52 pm
  #29  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,184
Originally Posted by Dave510
I'm merely saying housekeeping SHOULD move the luggage to a safe location if they see one in a checked out room (but of course they should first inform security and document it).
No. Security (or the bomb squad) should be the only ones to ever touch someone else's luggage.
C17PSGR likes this.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2018 | 7:40 pm
  #30  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cockeysville, MD
Programs: Marriott Rewards Lifetime Titanium, Amex Plat, Hertz Gold 5*, National Exec, AA Plat
Posts: 9,502
Not a Marriott, but a year ago I checked into a hotel in Cancun. Went to the room and the closet had neatly packed luggage inside. I spoke to a staff member in the hall. They offered to take the luggage out. I said "no I would return to the front desk". Apparently I got the wrong room and those people were still there. If I stayed, they bags would have been missing.
Mr. Vker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.