![]() |
Originally Posted by funkbandit
(Post 29274663)
And many MR Plat members receive a free birthday night which (together with a MR CC) brings the plat threshold to 59 nights/year.
|
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
(Post 29275507)
...for a promo that hasn't run in a year, and has no impact on Platinum, which is the point of this thread.
Excellent continued obfuscation though... |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
(Post 29275572)
And many SPG members get 5 nights per year through the SPG-branded American Express credit card, meaning they only need 45 nights per year to get platinum status. That's still significantly less than Marriott.
and rollover nights and phantom meeting nights We can go round and round on it...same argument holds for 500 LT SPG nights vs. 750 MR for LTP. There were also far fewer Starwood hotels (and the brand had a ~15% higher ADR, per 2016 stats, so one typically spent more), so one had to be "extra loyal" to choose Starwood over larger chains. |
Originally Posted by CJKatl
(Post 29275604)
The promo ran until six months ago, not a year ago and does impact Plats. I've witnessed it. The impact will be felt for a year from now. Those who don't travel to Asia cannot imagine the impact. Some CLs required reservations for some time and might still.
|
Seems to me like 18 nights in 3 months for SPG Plat is at least as hard as 9 stays in 3 months (or really 4) for Marriott Plat. So who's flooding whom? FWIW, I'm doing the Marriott challenge right now, primarily to get Plat to use at good foreign SPG properties in hopes of suite upgrades. A secondary benefit is the United status, which might score me some econ+ upgrades. The difference between Marriott Gold, which I already have, and Marriott Platinum, wouldn't have been worth bothering with on its own. So I think any complaints are more validly made in the opposite direction from what OP asserts. (That said, I ain't complaining either way!)
|
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
(Post 29275572)
And many SPG members get 5 nights per year through the SPG-branded American Express credit card, meaning they only need 45 nights per year to get platinum status. That's still significantly less than Marriott.
The bigger impact is Marriott Plats flooding into hotels that actually have a culture of upgrading SPG Platinum members. That is, hotels that have a decent amount of upgrade inventory to give and a stable of SPG Plats who are used to seeing those upgrades pretty regularly. That's a much bigger impact than a crowded lounge. So many Marriotts are built with very few large suites. Thus, as a Marriott Plat/Gold for many years I've never expected many upgrades. High floor, C-level, bed/smoke right, good view...I'm happy if they just get that stuff right. But SPG has always been more of an upgrade-centric program, and in the future it won't be unless they formally recognize something like the Plat 100 level across all the brands as the "upgrade level". |
Originally Posted by rbw5t
(Post 29275706)
Seems to me like 18 nights in 3 months for SPG Plat is at least as hard as 9 stays in 3 months (or really 4) for Marriott Plat. So who's flooding whom? FWIW, I'm doing the Marriott challenge right now, primarily to get Plat to use at good foreign SPG properties in hopes of suite upgrades. A secondary benefit is the United status, which might score me some econ+ upgrades. The difference between Marriott Gold, which I already have, and Marriott Platinum, wouldn't have been worth bothering with on its own. So I think any complaints are more validly made in the opposite direction from what OP asserts. (That said, I ain't complaining either way!)
As far as upgrades or whatever, I've done the match to SPG and I stayed there some nights last year before I did my homework and realized that the SPG nights were in a separate program and wouldn't count towards Marriott Lifetime night count or Lifetime status qualification (was Lifetime Gold, presently plat on the cusp of Lifetime plat). I switched back to Marriott for that reason in part, but another reason was that in North America, Marriott has a lot more locations than Starwood. The Delta location was much more convenient (Closer to where I needed to be) versus the nearest Starwood property. Hard for me to say how valid the "SPG flooding Marriott" claim is since my travel was way down for 2016 & 2017, especially since I spent most of 2016 & 2017 in FS Marriott Properties without concierge lounges. I did generally get upgraded as a plat at properties that could offer the rooms in 2016 (I spent most of 2017 at a Delta that did not have any upgraded rooms of substance). So, hard to measure. |
And FWIW, the 18 night challenge has some meat to it. That's a Plat-level stay pace in either program.
|
So many of you are also missing the point that the SPG status challenge would grant someone status to February 2020. That's also significant because until now all indications and reports were that Marriott would announce a new combined program sometime in 2018 that would begin in 2019. Extending status a full year past the potential start date of a new combined Marriott, Ritz-Carlton and SPG program strikes me as unusual, unless it's an indication that the combining of programs has been delayed.
|
Why would a respectable SPG Plat want to flood Marriott Club Lounge? A real SPG Plat would stay at SPG properties and enjoy the benefits while (s)he still can. Staying at Marriott to enjoy the overcrowded CL will only dilute the SPG Plat qualification effort.
I would only stay at a Marriott if that;s the only option where I'm going. |
Originally Posted by CIT85
(Post 29275848)
Why would a respectable SPG Plat want to flood Marriott Club Lounge? A real SPG Plat would stay at SPG properties and enjoy the benefits while (s)he still can. Staying at Marriott to enjoy the overcrowded CL will only dilute the SPG Plat qualification effort.
I would only stay at a Marriott if that;s the only option where I'm going. |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
(Post 29275789)
So many of you are also missing the point that the SPG status challenge would grant someone status to February 2020. That's also significant because until now all indications and reports were that Marriott would announce a new combined program sometime in 2018 that would begin in 2019. Extending status a full year past the potential start date of a new combined Marriott, Ritz-Carlton and SPG program strikes me as unusual, unless it's an indication that the combining of programs has been delayed.
|
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
(Post 29274900)
No. Starwood is Marriott, but SPG remains distinct from Marriott Rewards.
|
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
(Post 29274884)
The latest SPG challenge, which gives you SPG platinum status after 18 nights, specifically excludes a SPG gold from eligibility.
And you're just flat wrong that it excludes existing Golds. Otherwise your post is 100% spot on ;) |
Originally Posted by JackE
(Post 29276096)
If that's your position, then you misstated this as 'SPG flooding Marriott' instead of 'SPG flooding Marriott Rewards'.
I don't necessarily agree with the premise, but it's pretty clear that people here understood it. Marriott is the bigger program. Marriott doesn't have *much* in the way of anything capacity-controlled to give to Plats, because it isn't an upgrade-centric program to begin with. If you're in a crowded lounge, you might think "it's the United Golds" or "it's the SPG Plats", but you don't really know. Going the other direction, where more Starwoods actually have some suites to give to their Plats, it's more plausible that the much larger pool of Marriott Plats could significantly impact the SPG Plat's ability to get an upgrade. They were a smaller group. They were used to getting upgraded. That perception actually *could* be reality, unless Starwood hotels are actively checking somehow to upgrade their "native" elites first. (I don't know if they can or do that or not.) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:45 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.