Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Marriott General Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 3:44 pm
  #61  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,515
Originally Posted by khabah
If Hilton is in a race to some sort of bottom, why is Marriott doing the same?
They probably believe that all they have to do is be slightly better than their competitors, or at least no worse. Being a lot better may be seen as a waste.

Remember the old joke about two guys in the woods when a bear starts running at them? The punchline is: I don't have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you. That's the thinking about competition.

Originally Posted by kaizen7
Hopefully this pandemic made Marriott realise that their hotel owners dying when there are no guests staying.
So going forward they have to woo these guests back.
Are you suggesting cost cutting is not enough to turn a profit, that you also need revenue? That's an innovative thought that obviously hasn't occurred to management.
kaizen7 likes this.
richarddd is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 4:31 pm
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,191
As far as I'm concerned, the word vomit coming out of this joker's mouth is just noise around the edges
itsaboutthejourney likes this.
UA-NYC is online now  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 5:28 pm
  #63  
100k40 Nights40 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 9,225
Originally Posted by EasternTraveler
Sadly, the bosses are not paying attention.
talk about owner-centric...
Fabo.sk is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 5:42 pm
  #64  
10 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,434
I hope this interview will finally stop the Marriott apologists from calling SPG loyalists like me crazy and deluded for saying SPG was a better program for guests (especially elite ones) than Marriott and that Marriott isn't even trying to achieve SPG's level of guest satisfaction.

The CEO himself admits it!

So stop criticizing me for telling the truth about the programs. Marriott is better for owners (as I've always said) but not for guests, especially those like me that tend to spend at higher end properties.

The vast spread of Marriott doesn't appeal to me. Aside from some JWs, nothing much from the Marriott side appeals to me. I'm sure the spread appeals to many former loyalists who can now use points earned at vanilla properties at ex Starwood superior properties.

So, yes, I have shifted to Hyatt. I have had 2 paid stays at Marriotts in past 2 years. I still have a lot of points left that I'm trying to burn.

I just stayed at a Park Hyatt that was 80% more expensive than the St. Regis in the same city, 60% more than Ritz. I am fairly price inelastic but I care about treatment and service. PH was superior. The F&B manager called other Park Hyatts they know I like, for example, to find out what preferences my family has. They thus ordered Greek yogurt special for me. Wow. That's service.

And when the trip ended up being a disaster because of massive hardware problems on a daily basis (my foot went through the floor, the aircon blew up, the water system failed, the lights turned on every night in the middle of the night waking us up) , the head of the region I'm in actually called me when on I was the airplane heading home and then again 3 days later and emailed me twice and made me whole.

Will I boycott Marriott? Absolutely not. But for SPG loyalists, it was a painful transition especially when Marriott made it seem like they were maintaining SPG standards but it was obvious that it wasn't.

I'm glad the CEO was honest and came out. Now I know I'm not nuts. If Marriott happens to be the best option in a locale, I'll take it with zero expectations.

But if not, I'll take a Hyatt. I am on a 3 week trip right now. It's either Hyatt or whatever fits best and Marriott is not a choice unless it just so happens to be the best option.

Does Marriott care they lost me as a loyal customer? No. Owners prefer Marriott, prices are soaring, and they have that spread for corporate contracts. If I were Marriott, I'd do the same, without pretending life was same w SPG
SHLTP is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 7:43 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Programs: Delta Diamond 1MM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 513
I am bored as hell of Marriotts. Lifetime Platinum, zillions of points, zzzzz. I don't think this brand has anything to offer me, in terms of excitement or enjoying a hotel stay. Everywhere I go, all I seem to find are Springhill Suites, other garbage brands, the free breakfast I used to adore is basically all junk food.

I just earned Hyatt Globalist because Marriott turned me off this year with cutbacks. We'll see how that goes. Although Hyatt's cheap stuff like Hyatt Place is equally garbage.
CO-PLAT likes this.
flyerUSA is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 7:55 pm
  #66  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium (former PP), Hilton Silver, UA Silver, AS Member, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,906
The Marriott CEO is assuming that a lot of Marriott customers will not care, but those of us who were Marriott elite before the SPG merger and were used to the Marriott when Bill Marriott ran it are going to have limits as well. He might discover a lot of older Marriott customers leaving as well or at least considering other chains for some of their stays.
VA1379 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 9:10 pm
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited500k20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Gold, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .59 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,876
Originally Posted by emma dog
"Capuano said he wants guests to have a much more emotional relationship with Bonvoy."

Oh, it certainly is. Just not the emotional relationship one usually hopes for.
We've been Bonvyed!
VSLover and Dreamwalker like this.
SPN Lifer is online now  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 9:23 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 83
Would a SPG loyalist like to explain what caused SPG to sell ? If loyalty is supposed to increase spend and SPG did the most for it's biggest spenders why did it need to sell? I remember it struggling financially.

I want better perks at Hilton and Marriott. I just gave up my Hilton Aspire and stopped pushing for Platinum elite to remain a free agent for my spend. I use my budget and points at the highest end hotel in the area unless I'm using a FNC or it's a simple trip.

I was really on Hilton's team with the cool perks for cc during pandemic like the resort fee being used for restaurants. My stays at Conrad Chicago and Waldorf Astoria Maldives were top notch. I felt like a Hilton lead the pack with cc and FNC extensions or turning weekend into all nights. The tip more, room service at a request and loss of breakfast was enough I don't care about another coupon card and diamond status.

Now Marriott is saying because we are bigger you should accept what we offer? Why won't someone just be a free agent? Use programs like virtuso or Amex Fine Hotels etc for upgrades on cash paid stays?

Loyalty isn't valued anymore. Look at telecommunications they give discounts to new customers not existing. Any brand that truly values loyalty imo has to take out the short term mindset for long term. These companies worry about share price quarterly if not daily. They can't play the long game imo.
Dreamwalker is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 9:40 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Manhattan, Palm Beach Island, San Francisco, Boston, & Hong Kong
Programs: Lifetime United Global Services, Delta Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Ambassador, & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,165
Originally Posted by Dreamwalker
Would a SPG loyalist like to explain what caused SPG to sell ? If loyalty is supposed to increase spend and SPG did the most for it's biggest spenders why did it need to sell? I remember it struggling financially.

I want better perks at Hilton and Marriott. I just gave up my Hilton Aspire and stopped pushing for Platinum elite to remain a free agent for my spend. I use my budget and points at the highest end hotel in the area unless I'm using a FNC or it's a simple trip.

I was really on Hilton's team with the cool perks for cc during pandemic like the resort fee being used for restaurants. My stays at Conrad Chicago and Waldorf Astoria Maldives were top notch. I felt like a Hilton lead the pack with cc and FNC extensions or turning weekend into all nights. The tip more, room service at a request and loss of breakfast was enough I don't care about another coupon card and diamond status.

Now Marriott is saying because we are bigger you should accept what we offer? Why won't someone just be a free agent? Use programs like virtuso or Amex Fine Hotels etc for upgrades on cash paid stays?

Loyalty isn't valued anymore. Look at telecommunications they give discounts to new customers not existing. Any brand that truly values loyalty imo has to take out the short term mindset for long term. These companies worry about share price quarterly if not daily. They can't play the long game imo.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...s-und-resorts/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/...international/

Starwood was not performing well. At a time when the hospitality industry was booming and Marriott NI grew 14%+, Starwood's NI fell by 29.4%. #facts lol

We are talking about a company that returned $190 million to shareholders in 2013 and $2.4 billion to shareholders in 2014... at a time when the hospitality industry was booming and Starwood was stagnating. It is very apparent that Starwood had no idea how to grow.

Also:

"At a time when competitors Marriott (MAR), Hilton (HLT), and Hyatt (H) were beating analyst expectations and raising guidance, Starwoods growth has lagged not only industry growth but also investors expectations.

Starwood managed to add only 7,400 rooms in 2014 and 15,700 rooms in 2015. Its occupancy rate was the lowest among the top four players, and its revenue per available room (or RevPar) was the third from the bottom.

Some analysts believe the reason for this could be the last two CEOs inexperience in the hotel business."

But truly, the biggest weakness of Starwood was how asset-heavy it was. More than anything that is the reason why they were sold during a hospitality boom.

--

I strongly disagree with anyone that believes loyalty programs are supposed to garner the loyalty of guests. IMO these programs exist to:

1) Get customers to book direct rather than through OTAs
2) Source a consistent stream of customers for their franchisees

Of course Marriott cares about retention... but retention of their franchisees. At the end of the day, Bonvoy only needs to be tolerable enough that people will continue to a ) book direct when staying at a Bonvoy hotel b) consider Bonvoy hotels as credible options to begin with.

I genuinely think the difference between OTAs and asset-lite hotel companies becomes smaller and smaller every day?

Is there a huge difference between Hyatt's relationship with SLH and the Hotels.com relationship with a large hotel operator?

I think the rise of soft flags (that essentially have very limited brand standards) like Luxury Collection and LXR are a slow march toward this.
WasKnown is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 9:50 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 83
IMO you just said loyalty to guests in a different way. You want my loyalty to use your website and to feed your customer the franchisee. That requires loyalty from me the guest to accomplish that.

I think your just talking around loyalty for guest. Do I believe we are the reason for these programs no, but our spend is needed to fund whatever the reason is. Ie could be your points or could be to keep up with the Jones. Ie Hilton or whomever.


I understand SPG struggled. I wonder why if Hyatt is asset heavy too. To my knowledge it doesn't franchisee out. Did IHG start that trend? I feel like Hilton and Marriott were asset heavy when there namesakes still owned the primarily. I guess the Marriott's still do?? I can't remember.

Last edited by Dreamwalker; Jul 21, 2021 at 10:03 pm
Dreamwalker is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 9:52 pm
  #71  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC (LGA, JFK), CT
Programs: Delta Platinum, American Gold, JetBlue Mosaic 4, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Diamond,
Posts: 5,013
Ive met a lot of the CEOs involved here, including Arne, Capuano, Frits van Paaschen, Nassetta, Hoplamazian, etc. Never met Bill Marriott. But in terms of CEOs, industry people universally said Arne is the best in terms of vision and industry relations, followed closely by Nassetta. Frits van Paaschen was disliked in the industry and by shareholders. You can talk about high spending elites all you want but Starwood lagged Marriott and Hilton in delivering paying guests to US hotels. Hoplamazian seems fine but the Pritzkers run Hyatt.

I thought Stephanie Linnartz should have been elevated to CEO over Capuano (I said so in this forum after Arnes death), she would have been unlikely to say something like this in an interview no matter how true it is. Nevertheless Capuano is a serious developer and will make owners happy and grow the company.
Adelphos is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 10:03 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 83
Paying guests are important.
Dreamwalker is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 11:00 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Manhattan, Palm Beach Island, San Francisco, Boston, & Hong Kong
Programs: Lifetime United Global Services, Delta Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Ambassador, & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,165
Originally Posted by Adelphos
Ive met a lot of the CEOs involved here, including Arne, Capuano, Frits van Paaschen, Nassetta, Hoplamazian, etc. Never met Bill Marriott. But in terms of CEOs, industry people universally said Arne is the best in terms of vision and industry relations, followed closely by Nassetta. Frits van Paaschen was disliked in the industry and by shareholders. You can talk about high spending elites all you want but Starwood lagged Marriott and Hilton in delivering paying guests to US hotels. Hoplamazian seems fine but the Pritzkers run Hyatt.

I thought Stephanie Linnartz should have been elevated to CEO over Capuano (I said so in this forum after Arnes death), she would have been unlikely to say something like this in an interview no matter how true it is. Nevertheless Capuano is a serious developer and will make owners happy and grow the company.
Im really glad to read this. I have listened to pretty much every Arne Sorenson interview on YouTube. Somehow his talks have become my go-to workout noise whenever I dont feel like listening to audiobooks. He was my favorite out of all the big hotel executives (though I know he gets a lot of hate on this board). RIP.

But if we are being fair, Arne Sorenson basically said this exact thing (scale over benefits for loyalty) many times as the SPG merger happened. From the start, he always talked about leveraging scale and using a diversity of options to be the ultimate value proposition for guests. Perhaps he said it in a less inflammatory way but IMO the intention was the same. I think Bonvoy would continue to have gotten worse, even with Arne.

IMO the fact that Starwoods model clearly did not work is all the validation needed for Marriott to continue to gut SPG. Why pay for these benefits if theyre not actually attracting guests in tangible numbers?

Originally Posted by Dreamwalker
IMO you just said loyalty to guests in a different way. You want my loyalty to use your website and to feed your customer the franchisee. That requires loyalty from me the guest to accomplish that.

I think your just talking around loyalty for guest. Do I believe we are the reason for these programs no, but our spend is needed to fund whatever the reason is. Ie could be your points or could be to keep up with the Jones. Ie Hilton or whomever.


I understand SPG struggled. I wonder why if Hyatt is asset heavy too. To my knowledge it doesn't franchisee out. Did IHG start that trend? I feel like Hilton and Marriott were asset heavy when there namesakes still owned the primarily. I guess the Marriott's still do?? I can't remember.
You dont need to be loyal to Marriott. You need to a) book with Marriott directly and b) consider Marriott as a credible option when choosing hotels. I dont think Marriott thinks its worth being the indisputable best option for people like us. People fundamentally misunderstand loyalty programs.

Also, I really dont understand where youre coming from with the Hyatt asset heavy comment lol. Hyatt owns more hotels than many of its competitors but its been pretty clear they have shifted their focus away from O&L to F&M.

The entire industry (including Hyatt) shifted to asset light. Starwood sold itself because it couldnt shed its assets quickly enough. Hyatt didnt because it could.

https://skift.com/2019/03/06/hyatt-d...hter-approach/
SPN Lifer likes this.

Last edited by WasKnown; Jul 21, 2021 at 11:08 pm
WasKnown is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 11:11 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 83
My understanding was that Marriott and Hilton were asset light and loyalty programs light, because their customers were franchise and they have a large footprint. IE light assets, because they don't really own the properties. I thought Hyatt still own their properties and didn't franchise, so they needed a stronger loyalty program because of this and there smaller footprint. I did not realize they sold a lot of their properties too.

I don't understand your point of view with the A) book with Marriott Directly and b) consider Marriott as a credible option. If I am booking with them directly I am showing loyalty, if I find them a credible source, I am showing them loyalty. What is you definition of loyalty booking with another hotel?
Dreamwalker is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2021 | 11:19 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Manhattan, Palm Beach Island, San Francisco, Boston, & Hong Kong
Programs: Lifetime United Global Services, Delta Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Ambassador, & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,165
Originally Posted by Dreamwalker
My understanding was that Marriott and Hilton were asset light and loyalty programs light, because their customers were franchise and they have a large footprint. IE light assets, because they don't really own the properties. I thought Hyatt still own their properties and didn't franchise, so they needed a stronger loyalty program because of this and there smaller footprint. I did not realize they sold a lot of their properties too.

I don't understand your point of view with the A) book with Marriott Directly and b) consider Marriott as a credible option. If I am booking with them directly I am showing loyalty, if I find them a credible source, I am showing them loyalty. What is you definition of loyalty booking with another hotel?
Hyatt franchises a ton of their hotels, just like Marriott and Hilton. As of 2018, Hyatt only owned/leased 40 hotels. Considering thats an article dedicated to describing how Hyatt is mass dumping its properties moving into 2020 and 2022, its safe to assume that number is even lower than 40 today.

Ultimately, the fact that SPG didnt succeed is all the evidence Marriott needs to take a different path with loyalty. Starwood failed to grow (and even shrunk) during a time when the other hotel chains were expediting rapid growth. Even as weak as we view it, Bonvoy loses money. I just dont think guests-oriented programs make sense for large chains. People that really want a SPG experience are better off just staying in the Hyatt bubble.

Personally, I think the Marriott philosophy of portfolio diversity works for the reasons I outlined above.
SPN Lifer likes this.
WasKnown is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.