Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Malaysia Airlines | Enrich
Reload this Page >

Analysts suggest MH should shut down after failing to be profitable

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Analysts suggest MH should shut down after failing to be profitable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2019, 5:25 am
  #76  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Here
Programs: HHonors Diamond, AA EXP
Posts: 1,496
A large portion of population feels entitled and doesnt understand the concept of service. A wider reform in education is required to bring any substantial change to Malaysia. Btw the LCC is a pure ponzi scheme, so when it comes to fail will be a problem multifold of the current one
quinzinho likes this.
ashkale is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2019, 5:21 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Programs: MH Gold, AC Super Elite, UA Platinum, Accor All Gold, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by ashkale
A large portion of population feels entitled and doesnt understand the concept of service. A wider reform in education is required to bring any substantial change to Malaysia. Btw the LCC is a pure ponzi scheme, so when it comes to fail will be a problem multifold of the current one
Could you please explain why the LCC concept of Air Asia is s ponzi scheme?
quinzinho is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2019, 5:37 am
  #78  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: UK
Programs: Etihad Gold, Qatar Gold, flying Blue, Falcon, Lufthansa, Eva
Posts: 1,428
Originally Posted by quinzinho
Could you please explain why the LCC concept of Air Asia is s ponzi scheme?
I too would have been interested but having read the whole of the post I ignored it
amnicoll is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2019, 2:28 pm
  #79  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,557
Originally Posted by amnicoll
I (an Englishman) have no doubt that left to their own devices Malaysians could run an excellent airline and turn in a profit in the long run and that the problem is governmental interference. Sure there are social and wider economic benefits in running some services that are not profitable and the cost of these should be bourne by the government if they want MAS to run them and it should be paid for in the form of a contract with the government and not a cost to be carried by the airline
having done a lot of business in Malaysia, I believe that the problem is far more serious than government intervention.
Having a traditional Malay corporate structure compete internationally is near-impossible. It is not sufficient to simply appoint a foreign CEO or top management team.
d00t, ashkale, jysim and 1 others like this.
brunos is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2019, 9:43 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,132
Originally Posted by SilverChris
Of course there are Malaysians capable of running an airline. The real question is whether MH will be given a free hand to operate like a for-profit company. The airline won’t prosper if the meddling continues, foreign CEO or otherwise.


Sorry, just to be clear: I meant the statement that none of the Malaysians given the opportunity to run the airline have failed is, even if has been shown to be true, quite a harsh one to make... the implications of the PM saying it like that are doubly so (since neither Mueller or Bellew were able to do as much as needed either).

I too am sure there are Malaysians who would run the airline brilliantly. Sadly, they've not been put into place and / or given the tools to do so. Which is a shame, as I too find the onboard personnel to normally be quite good.
crackjack is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2020, 11:10 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,132
Update on the MH ownership saga:
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...-bank-12617064

The article seems to be confused on whether this GSV group is proposing they will purchase a 100% ownership stake in MH or if Khazanah will keep its controlling stake, as both are alluded to in the article text.
crackjack is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2020, 7:16 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: KUL
Programs: Salaryman One World Sapphire
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by crackjack
Update on the MH ownership saga:
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...-bank-12617064

The article seems to be confused on whether this GSV group is proposing they will purchase a 100% ownership stake in MH or if Khazanah will keep its controlling stake, as both are alluded to in the article text.
Talk is easy, but can they walk the talk (eg dealing with the almighty union) should everything materialized.
minizian is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2020, 9:30 pm
  #83  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,557
Originally Posted by crackjack
Update on the MH ownership saga:
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...-bank-12617064

The article seems to be confused on whether this GSV group is proposing they will purchase a 100% ownership stake in MH or if Khazanah will keep its controlling stake, as both are alluded to in the article text.
The proposal was made early March according to the article, and probably worked on weeks before. The World has dramatically changed in the past month.

Last edited by brunos; Apr 10, 2020 at 10:56 pm
brunos is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2020, 2:25 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,132
True, but GSV did reconfirm it a week ago, seems they are still interested in going forward.

Of course, appears Khazanah has since nixed GSV’s proposal due to the leverage being taken on....
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN21Q0CD

On a related note, MH / Khazanah is seeking direct government support for the airline:
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/tra...ing-more-funds

Last edited by crackjack; Apr 11, 2020 at 2:32 am
crackjack is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.