Annoying fees
#46
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York, NY
Programs: CO, NH
Posts: 21
Who has been to the RC Osaka lately? I was there last year on a working holiday and almost fainted when I logged on to the lobby wireless. The hotel was booked to the gills, my room was not ready, and I had to get online. It was something like $12 or $15 an hour.
So very tacky that my usual stress remedy of room service-supplied soba noodles and tempura barely helped. Next time I will stay at the perfectly acceptable Comfort Inn for $60, wired access included!
The eminently classy Seiyo Ginza charges something like $12.95/day for wired IIRC. This is the upper limit of what I can tolerate, but it's still disappointing from such a nice place.
It seems the real horror stories come from Europe though.
So very tacky that my usual stress remedy of room service-supplied soba noodles and tempura barely helped. Next time I will stay at the perfectly acceptable Comfort Inn for $60, wired access included!
The eminently classy Seiyo Ginza charges something like $12.95/day for wired IIRC. This is the upper limit of what I can tolerate, but it's still disappointing from such a nice place.
It seems the real horror stories come from Europe though.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,161
Name names, eh? I just got my charge card bill and there on it was an extra $13.11 from the Trump in NYC. $8.11 was for a minibar charge that I didn't incur. But the extra $5? I handed them a fedex box on the way out which they accepted -- and then silently charged me $5 for the privilege of taking it.
I have challenged both charges. Aw heck, I am doing more than challenging them, I am telling them I am not going to pay. At $575++, they can post a fedex for me now and then.
I do not accept that even a midrange hotel is allowed to charge for accepting or posting mail or fedex. Subcontracting a "business center" in the lobby and telling you it is a separate business is not an excuse.
I have challenged both charges. Aw heck, I am doing more than challenging them, I am telling them I am not going to pay. At $575++, they can post a fedex for me now and then.
I do not accept that even a midrange hotel is allowed to charge for accepting or posting mail or fedex. Subcontracting a "business center" in the lobby and telling you it is a separate business is not an excuse.
#48
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Programs: AA 11MM/EXP/Aairpass, SPG Plat
Posts: 343
Does anybody else think it's irritating that a full service luxury hotel (like a Four Seasons) would charge for thing like internet access? To me, that is a standard that most hotels that cater to business travellers should provide. I think it's ridiculous to get charged for that at a super high-end hotel. Thoughts?
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: ua mm, aa plat, starriott LTPP, ihg plat, hh gold.
Posts: 13,017
i'm typing this now on the free wifi at la casa que canta in zijuataneho. funny, they say they don't have wifi in the rooms, (it is free in the lobby and there are free computers in 'the internet room') but it works just fine. ^
#50
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: SPG: Plat; Amex: Plat.; Star Alliance: Gold, One World: Gold
Posts: 101
Gym charge
I styed at Kämp hotel (Starwood Luxury Collection) in Helsinki, Finland. They carged me 10 euros = 15 USD for the use of gym. It is a very small, in-house, one room gym.
I have never before been charged for the use of gym in a luxury hotel. I can understand gym charge in a lower category hotel but not in very expencive 5*.
I have never before been charged for the use of gym in a luxury hotel. I can understand gym charge in a lower category hotel but not in very expencive 5*.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: BAGold; AA3MMPlat; UA1MMGold; FBGold; MarriottAmb; AccorPlat; HHGold; ICPlatAmb; HyattDiscoverist
Posts: 4,378
I share your views, but the Kamp is not the only one that charges. IIRC, the Ritz-Carlton in Chicago (a Four Seasons hotel) used to; I think they may have dropped the charge now. I'm quite certain the Berkeley in London charged me when I stayed there a couple of years ago.
#52
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,856
Actually, I've found that annoyance charges in general are more common at luxury hotels than at lower level accomodations. I think they figure they have rich folks or expense account folks staying there and can get away with it more easily.
#53
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Sacramento, Ca USA
Programs: United 1K MM - 1.7M actually, Marriott Platinum Premier, Hertz Gold
Posts: 1,231
rich people (i am speaking for others, not myself )...hate those incidental charges as much as everyone else
#55
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,856
#56
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,716
The colloquial term for it is 'nickel and diming'. They charge you for every little thing. As someone pointed out, it's generally nicer hotels that do this. The worst example of this I have seen (not in the luxury category obviously) is the O'Hare Hilton charging you $5 to get the toothbrush kit out of the minibar when even the Comfort Inns in the area do this for free. Didn't make for a happy guest when I was stuck there without luggage.
In the end, it's really the manager who makes these decisions. I'd advocate anyone to write the chain directly and complain about it. Charging for a gym that was likely put there to get the checkbox of on site fitness facility on a booking website is a bit much. Some sites who have excellent modern fitness facilities charge as well, but at least then you're getting some value for your money. In the end though, it really should be included in the room rate. It's just a hotel manager trying to get revenue that they can't get in the room rate given their market.
In the end, it's really the manager who makes these decisions. I'd advocate anyone to write the chain directly and complain about it. Charging for a gym that was likely put there to get the checkbox of on site fitness facility on a booking website is a bit much. Some sites who have excellent modern fitness facilities charge as well, but at least then you're getting some value for your money. In the end though, it really should be included in the room rate. It's just a hotel manager trying to get revenue that they can't get in the room rate given their market.
#57
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FRA
Programs: BMI Silver, UA MP, OnePass
Posts: 174
These charges may be annoying when you want to use these facilities but think about it: They keep the hotel rates for everybody down. If internet and gym was included you would pay for it indirectly via a higher hotel rate.
#58
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,856
The expectation at the high end is that some things should be routinely included. These include the gym and internet access to me, even if I don't use them, I get annoyed seeing that there is extra charge.
#59
Moderator, SkyTeam and Germany
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: FRA/STR/NUE
Programs: BA, LH, KL, EY, IHG, Marriott, Hyatt, Hilton, Radisson
Posts: 5,946
Thanks to a suggestion by another flyertalker I have merged the threads Gym charge and Nickel and dimed into one thread for housekeeping reasons. The redirect of the other thread will vanish in the next days.
ralfkrippner, co-moderator
ralfkrippner, co-moderator
#60
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SXF/TXL, old europe.
Programs: Skyhigh Airlines Platinum for Life
Posts: 962
Annoying fees
My partner and I just returned from a trip to Japan and spent the last few days in the RC Tokyo on Club floor. The service lived up to our expectations and the stay was very enjoyable. But one thing was rather unpleasant: We were using the pool (which was free) but upon entering the spa the staff confronted us with a fee of 2.100Yen (13€, 20$) per person for using a locker. Of course, they were very nice, but this didn't make it any better.
I would have happily paid it for using the pool, if I knew about the fee beforehand but asking for a locker fee and stating the use of the pool is free ist just wrong.
What do you think? Any other "annoying" fees in Luxury Hotels you can think of?
I would have happily paid it for using the pool, if I knew about the fee beforehand but asking for a locker fee and stating the use of the pool is free ist just wrong.
What do you think? Any other "annoying" fees in Luxury Hotels you can think of?