Which hotel in Bangkok (new thread, started 9/23)?
#16
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: New York City
Programs: Virtuoso, AMAN, FS PP, RW Elite, MO Fanclub, RC STARS, Belmond Bellini, Peninsula PC, Hyatt Privé
Posts: 246
My thoughts are pretty similar to comments above. PH has better breakfast than Rosewood/Kempinski. Design wise both Siam/Sindohorn Kempinski are the least attractive.
Outside of those choices, I think FS Chao Praya is the best overall BKK hotel now. The Siam is quite special as well. I don’t get the appeal of MO BKK, I find it too stuffy. I am not crazy about Capella either.
Outside of those choices, I think FS Chao Praya is the best overall BKK hotel now. The Siam is quite special as well. I don’t get the appeal of MO BKK, I find it too stuffy. I am not crazy about Capella either.
Another note I've heard from friends and clients alike is it seems the residents, their guests, tourist & local visitors, creates an unwelcome collision with guests in common spaces and other facilities (especially during festive/ high season).
#18
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
Hardware is 20+ years out of date, location isn't great. Service though is fantastic. It's unfortunately not able to be considered amongst Bangkok's other luxury hotels until the owners get around to doing a refresh.
#19
I've heard mixed reviews regarding FS Chao Phraya. Being a Jean-Michel Gathy, the hard product looks lovely, and modern (albeit a few corners cut after covid)... the issue with FS Chao Phraya is really the soft product, inconsistent service and not-so-hospitable approach to guest communication/care that makes this property fall short compared to Capella. For me, Thailand is all about hospitality, so it's hard for me to overlook this facet when it comes to a hotel in Bangkok.
Another note I've heard from friends and clients alike is it seems the residents, their guests, tourist & local visitors, creates an unwelcome collision with guests in common spaces and other facilities (especially during festive/ high season).
Another note I've heard from friends and clients alike is it seems the residents, their guests, tourist & local visitors, creates an unwelcome collision with guests in common spaces and other facilities (especially during festive/ high season).
#21
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYZ
Programs: Ex-Bonvoyed, Hyatt, Hilton, BR, AC, AA
Posts: 1,298
Pool is fine, you still have infinity pool with nice views, and the canopy blocks rain, if you still wanna stay pool side.
#22
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
I’ve stayed at the WA many times and was most recently there a few weeks ago:
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
#23
I’ve stayed at the WA many times and was most recently there a few weeks ago:
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
#24
formerly known as deathscar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Virtuoso | Four Seasons Preferred Partner | Rosewood Elite | Hyatt Prive - and more
Posts: 2,096
Quick Sukhothai update (will do a full review later). But some pics/videos are up on my IG (@chinmoylad) in the stories section as well as scrolling down to pics on the main page.
Maybe those who have stayed a few times before over the years can shed some light.
I was in one of the newer Club Suites - which for the hard product and space alone are worth the splurge especially if you will have visitors over to the property, but if you don't mind much smaller spaces, the Club Lounge alone isn't (currently) worth it. The Club Suite clocks in at 90 sqm but due to the design/spacing feels considerably larger than even ~110-120 sqm suites I've stayed in, pretty interesting.
Quite a few changes coming here of course with the renos, so watch out for this space I guess!
Overall, would happily go back here - it feels like a resort within Bangkok (ala The Siam but far more centrally located than The Siam) - and we have Hill/Tuttle and that incredible pool area to thank for that.
Visited Rosewood - quite liked the hard product and the location is ideal for those wanting to be really in the city.
Question is more about the soft product but it is headed up by Sandra Watermann (ex Aman) - some cool F&B concepts on property too. The main pool looks nice but is shaded all day so must be a bit odd.
The Pool Suites are quite stunning - when converted to USD not so bad, but if you won't be enjoying the room itself much then regular suites will probably do just fine.
The MO refurb is absolutely stunning, but of course it's a very different type of hotel from the others.
- Really enjoyed this property overall - Kerry Hill + Ed Tuttle touches, and that pool area, along with the overall property (landscape/gardens etc) is incredible.
- There is a fair amount of construction happening as they are upgrading many areas, but it doesn't affect your stay too much except for the spa. They will be converting the 'houses' into spa houses later, should be incredible. Currently the presidential Sukhothai Suite serves as an intimate spa space, quite nicely done up for a temporary spa.
- Food was generally pretty fair, but was really good at their Thai restaurant Celadon.
- Same for service - the property as a whole offers a more intimate feel. It was generally quite good, thoughtful, considerate etc without being truly exceptional ala The Siam.
- Quite like the bar concepts they have going on too.
Maybe those who have stayed a few times before over the years can shed some light.
I was in one of the newer Club Suites - which for the hard product and space alone are worth the splurge especially if you will have visitors over to the property, but if you don't mind much smaller spaces, the Club Lounge alone isn't (currently) worth it. The Club Suite clocks in at 90 sqm but due to the design/spacing feels considerably larger than even ~110-120 sqm suites I've stayed in, pretty interesting.
Quite a few changes coming here of course with the renos, so watch out for this space I guess!
Overall, would happily go back here - it feels like a resort within Bangkok (ala The Siam but far more centrally located than The Siam) - and we have Hill/Tuttle and that incredible pool area to thank for that.
Visited Rosewood - quite liked the hard product and the location is ideal for those wanting to be really in the city.
Question is more about the soft product but it is headed up by Sandra Watermann (ex Aman) - some cool F&B concepts on property too. The main pool looks nice but is shaded all day so must be a bit odd.
The Pool Suites are quite stunning - when converted to USD not so bad, but if you won't be enjoying the room itself much then regular suites will probably do just fine.
The MO refurb is absolutely stunning, but of course it's a very different type of hotel from the others.
#25
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Programs: UA Global Services, TSA Pre✓, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 1,115
Reply
I’ve stayed at the WA many times and was most recently there a few weeks ago:
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
- On the surface, the hardware is absolutely stunning. I love it, especially the “Deluxe Suite”, while not a suite, it’s beautiful
- If you look more closely, it’s already aging badly because of the poor construction quality. For example, on 10th floor part of the hallway floor isn’t straight, in my shower part of the tiling was no longer aligned and the pool has bits of rust where they didn’t use the right parts
- The pool on the roof is much nicer than it might seem. The beds on the far end are comfortable and there’s good service. The construction next door can be annoying, but wasn’t too bad when I was there
- Best breakfast anywhere, and I’m also a big fan of the Loft - a stunningly beautiful bar with a surprisingly good team
- A number of people on here have reported bad efforts at service recovery and some bad juju from the GM. I’m lucky not to have had any issues, but can well imagine this to be an issue - they do seem a bit inflexible at times for a luxury hotel
- Pricing a few weeks ago was a whole level below luxury alternatives, which is always a plus for me
I ended up booking PH on FHR but then added a day to my stay. And WA pricing $35 below PH for the extra night so figure I could try it for a night and with FHR or Impresario benefits would do well.
#26
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: New York City
Programs: Virtuoso, AMAN, FS PP, RW Elite, MO Fanclub, RC STARS, Belmond Bellini, Peninsula PC, Hyatt Privé
Posts: 246
Agree completely. This would exciting and much welcomed. Love Pen Bangkok.
#27
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,216
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,161
#29
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 181
At Capella BKK, the 1 bdrm Villa is not much more expensive (like ~$300) than the Veranda suite (both have private outdoor hot tub plunge pool). Anyone care to share some insights? Seems like the Villa is either good value, or the Veranda is a bit over priced.
#30
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYZ
Programs: Ex-Bonvoyed, Hyatt, Hilton, BR, AC, AA
Posts: 1,298
I prefer the Villa for vastly better privacy, both in entering your villa (since it's separate from the main building and can be access outside), and not having guests staying in the rooms directly above have perfect view of your plunge pool and lounge chair.