Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

Luxury hotels have trouble delivering consistent experience globally: report

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Luxury hotels have trouble delivering consistent experience globally: report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2015, 9:41 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: La Jolla, California
Programs: KrisFlyer Gold, SWA CP
Posts: 1,125
Originally Posted by uggboy
Tripadvisor shouldn't be so easily dismissed.
Don't agree. The percentage of fake reviews is so high that the site is rendered useless. It is as bad or worse than Yelp in this regard. Let's not even discuss the type of individual that posts reviews on a site such as TA after a stay at a 5* property. Moreover, the data shouldn't (can't) be analyzed in the manner that this study attempted. Without getting too technical: correlation does not mean causation.

This thing is so bad it should be career ending for Piers and his minions.
mike_la_jolla is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 2:04 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: France
Posts: 971
Originally Posted by uggboy
Tripadvisor shouldn't be so easily dismissed, it's an important source of information and we use and contribute to this site on a regular basis. ^
+1
Some reviews are useless, but others contain valuable information and I like to see travellers pictures on TA.
Pierre&Cédric is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 2:24 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Here, there … you know how it goes.
Posts: 1,518
Originally Posted by uggboy
Tripadvisor shouldn't be so easily dismissed ...
Originally Posted by Pierre&Cédric
Some reviews are useless, but others contain valuable information and I like to see travellers pictures on TA.
I agree with these, and while I do not post on TA, several others on this board certainly do (bhrubin springs to mind).

In the same way I do not unabashedly cheerlead all things Aman, I also will not wholesale discount TA. There are some really, incredibly helpful reviews there ... just a low signal/noise ratio, which entails sifting a bit to find the valuable reports.
Originally Posted by nicolas75
In statistics, the more data you get, the better it is.

In such a project (like any big data analytics), analysis based on millions of data is always more reliable than peremptory comments ...
Yes, but "more data" ≠ "better data" if it one's data-set is fundamentally flawed (or, at the very least, skewed).
aa213bb is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 2:38 pm
  #19  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,638
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
Don't agree. The percentage of fake reviews is so high that the site is rendered useless. It is as bad or worse than Yelp in this regard. Let's not even discuss the type of individual that posts reviews on a site such as TA after a stay at a 5* property. Moreover, the data shouldn't (can't) be analyzed in the manner that this study attempted. Without getting too technical: correlation does not mean causation.

This thing is so bad it should be career ending for Piers and his minions.
Winner of the most pompous statement 2015...
DYKWIA is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 3:02 pm
  #20  
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeBanyan Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: We love to Fly, Hotels and Discovery
Posts: 1,471
Originally Posted by Pierre&Cédric
+1
Some reviews are useless, but others contain valuable information and I like to see travellers pictures on TA.
Indeed, sometimes the photos on TA say more than "1000 written words"...^
uggboy is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 3:03 pm
  #21  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Many a "luxury" hotel group do indeed have trouble delivering a consistent experience globally.

I do find Tripadvisor useful, at least in some ways -- despite its issues, and sometimes because of its issues.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 4:03 pm
  #22  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,865
It does seem to me that, even if one assumes that TripAdvisor reviews are all correct, the methodology is flawed in that it would discriminate heavily against (or be least accurate about) chains that are mostly located in remote areas; e.g., Aman would only be judged on a small percentage of their total hotels.
RichardInSF is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2015, 6:33 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Seat 1A
Programs: Non-status paid F/J (best value for $$$)
Posts: 4,125
Originally Posted by uggboy
Indeed, sometimes the photos on TA say more than "1000 written words"...^
Agreed. When I go to TA, I usually only look at the pictures. I seldom read the reviews.
daniellam is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 10:10 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
This report is based on the concept of mass market luxury - the sort of guests who have 'once-in-a-lifetime experiences, then go on to write about it on TripAdvisor.

It is completely off target for the world's frequent luxury-hotel guests; many of whom would rarely stay in a Ritz-Carlton over a Four Seasons.

'Lies, damned lies and statistics'?
vuittonsofstyle is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 12:38 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
they designed this to promote >
- social media enterprises like TA
- their own social media enterprise
- certain hotel companies (why?)

so their attacks are a part of that

maybe part is 'rewarding' companies with social media focus?

this is not journalism, this is a business trying to make money
but even if it were journalism, journalism ethics are long dead
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 2:02 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Mosaic
Posts: 1,050
Originally Posted by mike_la_jolla
Don't agree. The percentage of fake reviews is so high that the site is rendered useless. It is as bad or worse than Yelp in this regard. Let's not even discuss the type of individual that posts reviews on a site such as TA after a stay at a 5* property. Moreover, the data shouldn't (can't) be analyzed in the manner that this study attempted. Without getting too technical: correlation does not mean causation.

This thing is so bad it should be career ending for Piers and his minions.
It's usefulness is the same as yelp's: Pictures.

Their ranking is good for weeding out the worst of the worst. Eg: Bottom 20% is probably under par.
pWei is online now  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 2:06 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeSPG 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Germany
Programs: Some
Posts: 11,539
Originally Posted by vuittonsofstyle
This report is based on the concept of mass market luxury - the sort of guests who have 'once-in-a-lifetime experiences, then go on to write about it on TripAdvisor.

It is completely off target for the world's frequent luxury-hotel guests; many of whom would rarely stay in a Ritz-Carlton over a Four Seasons.

'Lies, damned lies and statistics'?
So true. Nothing against "once in a lifetime" but it´s simply not objective.
Itßs like: "Hey, they had even someone who carried our bags!"
offerendum is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 2:32 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: PARIS (France)
Programs: AF/KLM Club 2000 | InterContinental Diamond RA |AMEX Plat | Visa Infinite |Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 10,976
Originally Posted by vuittonsofstyle
This report is based on the concept of mass market luxury - the sort of guests who have 'once-in-a-lifetime experiences, then go on to write about it on TripAdvisor.
1. Not quite sure to understand on what is based your assertion.

2. Why do you think that "once-in-a-lifetime experiences" guests (are they not part of the market) not relevant for sharing their perception of the quality of the service delivered?

3. How do you explain that obviously hotels chain do better than other ones?
nicolas75 is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 2:46 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: PARIS (France)
Programs: AF/KLM Club 2000 | InterContinental Diamond RA |AMEX Plat | Visa Infinite |Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 10,976
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
they designed this to promote >
- social media enterprises like TA
- their own social media enterprise
- certain hotel companies (why?)

so their attacks are a part of that

maybe part is 'rewarding' companies with social media focus?

this is not journalism, this is a business trying to make money
but even if it were journalism, journalism ethics are long dead
Not quite sure to understand on what is based your assertion.

Such study (as being myself part of a strategy consulting group) is clearly a job to show what results you can get with big data analytics (and I presume sell consulting job after).

It is based on TA reviews just because it is, by number, the easiest way to make such analytics (may I recall that, for a luxury brand, my consulting group has made a comparison between internal data and TA reviews: it shows no discrepancy). Still, what you have not with TA reviews is how your most loyal customers like or not your brand (the reason why you need both internal and external material).
nicolas75 is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2015, 2:47 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
nicolas75, youre kidding right? social media management. and did you forget about room counts and occupancy rates? thats not even getting into them picking and choosing what to include and how to include it.

they chose not to take average for each hotel and then average them to get average for brand.

all of their choices, regardless of their explanations, can be open to questioning motives.
Kagehitokiri is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.