LH and LO don't get along too well?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MUC
Programs: LH HON, BMI gold
Posts: 519
LH and LO don't get along too well?
It seemed a bit odd to me how LH and LO treat each other at FRA, MUC and WAW with regards to limousine service when arriving or departing at remote position.
LH does serve LH, OS and LX flights in MUC and FRA, but not LO flights.
LO does serve OS and LO flights in WAW, but not LH flights.
Is this purely caused by commercial disagreement between both - I would be happy if they could solve it for the benefit of the customers...
LH does serve LH, OS and LX flights in MUC and FRA, but not LO flights.
LO does serve OS and LO flights in WAW, but not LH flights.
Is this purely caused by commercial disagreement between both - I would be happy if they could solve it for the benefit of the customers...
Last edited by muc_flyer; Aug 17, 2008 at 7:16 am
#3
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
It seemed a bit odd to me how LH and LO treat each other at FRA, MUC and WAW with regards to limousine service when arriving or departing at remote position.
LH does serve LH, OS and LX flights in MUC and FRA, but not LO flights.
LO does serve OS and LO flights in WAW, but not LH flights.
Is this purely caused by commercial disagreement between both - I would be happy if they could solve it for the benefit of the customers...
LH does serve LH, OS and LX flights in MUC and FRA, but not LO flights.
LO does serve OS and LO flights in WAW, but not LH flights.
Is this purely caused by commercial disagreement between both - I would be happy if they could solve it for the benefit of the customers...
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MUC
Programs: LH HON, BMI gold
Posts: 519
yeah well, maybe no one (or not enough people) bothered about it so far, and strange behavior it is indeed. How to achieve this is gonna be changed is the key and this might be to first understand why they don't like each other to come to a solution in a second "phase"
#7
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
#9
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MUC
Programs: LH HON, BMI gold
Posts: 519
#11
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: LEJ BRU
Posts: 1,156
About 2 years ago LH, OS and LX started to share the check-in counters in BRU with LO. Unfortunately no staff had been added so queuing became pretty usual even at F/*G/SEN counter. Surprisingly the answer to that misery has`nt been more stuff but throwing LO out of the circle last year. Seems to be real friendship...
#12
#13
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-SIN-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,606
Well, LH doesn't serve SK very well (at FRA/MUC), according to SK crew, and I have seen this and been inconvenienced by the same!
#14
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MUC (home), DUS (office), XXX (customer)
Programs: LH, AB, SPG, CC, Sixt, EC
Posts: 6,334
I bet on the usual "but we are LH, screw you" attitude
#15
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PL
Programs: M@M FT, Flying Blue, BA Exec. Club, CSA Plus
Posts: 297
You should just try it and feel the difference...