777 might feature first class...
Dec 22, 2018, 7:13 am
#32
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: London, Paris
Programs: LH HON, AF Platinum
Posts: 2,001
Note: I don’t think Polaris is marketed as a first class product. If it was, I’d put BA above it.
Also I am humored when people call it the best business class. I get it’s a joke, but it’s funny because not even that is true since SQ business is better IMO.
Dec 22, 2018, 7:22 am
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,646
Of all the first class products out there (including TAAG Angola, if OMAAT is accurate), it is easily the worst. That puts it in garbage tier.
Note: I don’t think Polaris is marketed as a first class product. If it was, I’d put BA above it.
Also I am humored when people call it the best business class. I get it’s a joke, but it’s funny because not even that is true since SQ business is better IMO.
And it’s way better than SQ J IMO
Dec 22, 2018, 7:25 am
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: London, Paris
Programs: LH HON, AF Platinum
Posts: 2,001
You’re not exactly disagreeing with me that it’s the worst F product out there. IMO, if you have the worst F product, your F product is garbage. That applies to any product really.
Anyways, whether or not it’s better than SQ business is definitely a bit more subjective. I prioritize hard product mostly because I don’t drink and rarely eat airplane food. But if you value champagne quality I guess it’s better in BA first (I wouldn’t know), so I can see why you’d say that.
Anyways, whether or not it’s better than SQ business is definitely a bit more subjective. I prioritize hard product mostly because I don’t drink and rarely eat airplane food. But if you value champagne quality I guess it’s better in BA first (I wouldn’t know), so I can see why you’d say that.