Last edit by: irishguy28
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
WELCOME, MODERATOR GUIDELINES and SUMMARY
WELCOME, MODERATOR GUIDELINES and SUMMARY
If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk!
Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveller information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel (not politics or arguments about politics or religion, etc.)
All travellers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.
We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, please remember "welcoming, respectful" are key words on FlyerTalk.
As with previous accident threads, please observe the following general rules in this thread:
1. The normal FT Rules apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.
2. You are expected to respect our diversity, and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.
3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Reasonable speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions or depictions (or links to same) that could well be hurtful.
4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously may be summarily deleted. Moderator actions may not be discussed in posts on FlyerTalk.
5. FlyerTalk complies with international copyright agreements. Please do not post full copyrighted articles; summarize the salient points, cite properly and post links. Entire copyrighted articles will be summarily deleted.
6. In addition, those who repeatedly fail to comply with FlyerTalk Rules or the guidelines for this thread may be subjected to FlyerTalk disciplinary actions and have membership privileges suspended, forum masks, etc.
7. If you cite what a particular news outlet is reporting, you need to provide a link so that others can examine the source themselves.
8. If you have an issue with a post, please contact a moderator (click on the button)
AND, along with these general rules, the Moderator Team has needed to develop several other specific rules as this thread has developed:
- Please discuss confine general discussion of German or European medical practices or general information/perspective on mental health issues to a thread elsewhere that you may find by searching or may wish to start in an appropriate forum.
- General discussions of the "culture" of Germanwings -- including attitudes towards sickness -- can now be found on this thread, whose opening post was split off of this one: What is the Germanwings sickness attitude/culture like?
- GENERAL discussion of cockpit security procedures, comparisons to other countries' procedures, specifics regarding other airlines' procedures are off-topic for this thread. Please discuss in this thread in Travel Buzz: Cockpit security and policies on entering the cockpit [follow up 4U incident thread]
- Discussion of the relative veracity/trustworthiness of individual news sources/outlets is outside the scope of this thread.
- Speculative discussions of lawsuits, jurisdiction, other countries' procedures, etc., are also not germane at this point.
- We recognise the FT community comes from all walks of life, aviation experts and those who just enjoy travelling. When posting about aviation terms in this thread please try to spell out these rather than just using the acronym. This will help all of us to understand your post better.
If you or someone you know struggles with mental health issues, please find support information here:FT Cares! Seeking international suicide prevention & crisis intervention listings
4U9525 Moderator team: totti, oliver2002, NewbieRunner, starflyergold, DownUnderFlyer, cblaisd, TWA884
============================================
Germanwings Flight 4U 9525 (Barcelona - Dusseldorf) crashed on 24 March 2015, coming down in the Alps near Barcelonette France
Aircraft involved is Airbus A320 reg D-AIPX. It was delivered to Lufthansa in 1991 and passed to Germanwings in 2001. It received routine maintenance at DUS the day before the crash (performed by Lufthansa Technik) and had its last major overhaul ( C-Check) in the summer of 2013. Lufthansa have said the plane was in 'perfect' condition.
Circumstances
It is very likely that the aircraft was deliberately crashed by the co-pilot Andreas Lubwitz
As per Germanwings press conference held 1400 on 24th March:
The aircraft flew from DUS to BCN on the morning of the crash
The flight left BCN at 1001 local time, it reached crusing altitude of 38000 at 1045 but remained there for only one minute before beginning a descent which lasted 8 minutes and ended in the crash.
ATC permission was not asked for the descent and it is unclear whether or not the crew were in ATC contact and under what circumstances an emergency was declared.
Subsequent reports suggest there was no communication between the crew and ATC after the aircraft began to descend.
The weather was good at the time of the crash:
Surface weather near where they started the descent:
METAR LFTH 240800Z AUTO 07012KT 9999 NSC 15/08 Q1008
METAR LFTH 240830Z AUTO 07012KT 9999 NSC 15/09 Q1008
METAR LFTH 240900Z AUTO 08016KT 9999 FEW035 SCT130 15/08 Q1008
That's basically unrestricted visibility at the surface.
Posted by Captainmiles Post #156 in this thread
US govt sources say no evidence of terrorism (reported on sky news uk)
Germanwings/Lufthansa official response
Germanwings press conference announced for 1500 local time, to be held in Cologne
Press conference reports: Lufthansa group employees enroute to crash site, families of victims being informed, crisis center set up at DUS airport
New flight number have been announced
4U9440 DUS0645 – 0855BCN EQV
4U9441 BCN0935 – 1155DUS EQV
Relatives of victims have been transported to the crash area by Lufthansa
Lufthansa press conference held at 1330 GMT on 26 March stated that the plane was most likely brought down deliberately by the co-pilot.
Video recording of the press conference (26 March):
In German
In English (simultaneous translation)
Victims
Latest reports are 144 passengers and 6 crew aboard, Spanish government report 45 Spanish nationals, French government reports 0 French nationals, German government reports there are some German victims but numbers not known (German wings press conference reports 67), Sky News UK reports Turkish nationals on board. There were 2 babies, one of the belonging to a woman from Manchester and the other is German, the child of opera singer Maria Radner who was travelling on the flight with her husband.
Two of the victims were Australians - a mother and her adult son from Victoria.
Two victims from Argentina
Three from Great Britain
One Israeli
Two Colombians
One Belgian
One Dutch
Two Iranians
Three Americans
Two Japanese
Three Mexicans
The German victims include 16 pupils and 2 teachers from Joseph Koenig Gymnasium (high school) at Haltern Am See, they were returning from an exchange visit to Spain.
Crew comprised 4 cabin crew and 2 flight deck. The captain had been with Lufthansa group for 10 years and had over 6000 hours on this plane type.
The co-pilot is widely reported to have joined Germanwings straight out of training in 2013 and to have had 630 hours of experience.
French rescue services believe there are no survivors.
Emergency contact numbers
From Germany 0800 1133 5577
From Spain 902 400 012
0049 30 5000 3000
The names of the victims will be published once their families have been informed.
Crash site
The crash site has been identified by helicopters, it is not accessible by road and is around 2 and a half hours walk from the nearest road (reported Sky News UK). It is at an altitude of around 2000m. Search and rescue teams are en-route. There may be an avalanche risk which could hamper rescue efforts. Rescuers are assembling at Seyne-Les-Alpes.
Sky news UK are reporting that a helicopter has landed near the crash site. They have confirmed no survivors and have reported the largest piece of debris to be about car sized. The debris field is about 200 square meters in size. See also http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/24557269-post183.html
Investigation - confirmed information
Large numbers of French investigators are on site, efforts have been made to secure the site against outside interference.
The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) has been recovered and taken for investigation at French BEA. It is damaged but functional. Voices can be heard on the recording but it is unclear if they are those of the flight crew.
BEA is working in cooperation with German BFU (Bundesstelle für Flugunfalluntersuchung), Airbus and CFM.
The aircraft was complete until impact - there was no midair breakup
"Germanwings Pilot Was Locked Out of Cockpit Before Crash in France"
New York Times reports that one of the two pilots was locked out of the cockpit during the descent: “You can hear he is trying to smash the door down.” http://nyti.ms/1HC7g9i
French prosecuters believe that the crash was caused by the deliberate actions of the co-pilot, he is thought to have locked the captain out of the cockpit and then to have deliberately crashed the aircraft.
Video of cockpit operation and manual override switch to block door from being opened externally. From The Guardian.
A locked door is opened by a flight crew inside the cockpit but can also be unlocked by cabin crew entering a keycode from the outside. Crew inside the cockpit can manually override it to keep a door locked for up to five minutes.
On 6 May 2015, the BEA released its preliminary report.
Reliable Sources
AV Herald page on the crash.
FlightRadar24 flight path map
flightware tracking log
BBC News "What we know so far"
Germanwings / 4U 9525 A320 Alpine plane crash 24 Mar 2015
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,742
If that's not extraordinary - I don't know what would be.
#63
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Geneva, Dubai, Paris
Programs: Disillusioned Cent
Posts: 1,880
lucky9876coins suggests to follow this Twitter link for the most up to date news:
https://twitter.com/thatjohn
https://twitter.com/thatjohn
#64
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin and Southern France
Programs: Delta Platinum, Delta MM; HH Diamond, Starwood Platinum, ICH Platinum Ambassador, Hertz Gold
Posts: 745
#65
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 10 months VLC, 2 months everywhere else
Programs: *A
Posts: 3,770
#67
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Toulon is (roughly halfway) between Marseille and Nice, although the Marseille airport is somewhat inland from the Mediterranean Sea. It's an industrial and port city. East of Toulon begins the pretty part of the French Riviera, which stretches along the coast to Nice and a bit beyond to Monaco at the Italian border.
#68
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gloucestershire
Programs: BA Gold (ex-GGL, maybe future Silver), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,201
This is clearly a shocking tragedy, and RIP to all souls on board. However there are quite a lot of questions here that spring to mind.
At a slower rate of descent, they *might* have been able to divert (into NCE?) from their original flight path, had they begun to turn when the emergency was declared.
Loss of cabin pressurisation doesn't explain why they went to 5k feet over the Alps.
It's not structural break-up because the plane was found in one place and the descent was fairly constant.
There's no obvious reason to suspect terrorism, because there was time to make a distress call.
Engine failure seems to be the obvious cause, but was the continuous 3k/minute descent consistent with that? Should the plane have been able to descend more slowly, if only to buy time to restart the engines?
Could the pilots have attempted to divert? Given that losing altitude over the Alps means CFIT is guaranteed if the engines didn't restart, whereas there might have been a chance of a somewhat more controlled landing on flatter ground, why does the plane appear not to have diverted from its flight path whatsoever?
At a slower rate of descent, they *might* have been able to divert (into NCE?) from their original flight path, had they begun to turn when the emergency was declared.
Loss of cabin pressurisation doesn't explain why they went to 5k feet over the Alps.
It's not structural break-up because the plane was found in one place and the descent was fairly constant.
There's no obvious reason to suspect terrorism, because there was time to make a distress call.
Engine failure seems to be the obvious cause, but was the continuous 3k/minute descent consistent with that? Should the plane have been able to descend more slowly, if only to buy time to restart the engines?
Could the pilots have attempted to divert? Given that losing altitude over the Alps means CFIT is guaranteed if the engines didn't restart, whereas there might have been a chance of a somewhat more controlled landing on flatter ground, why does the plane appear not to have diverted from its flight path whatsoever?
#71
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,765
This is clearly a shocking tragedy, and RIP to all souls on board. However there are quite a lot of questions here that spring to mind.
At a slower rate of descent, they *might* have been able to divert (into NCE?) from their original flight path, had they begun to turn when the emergency was declared.
Loss of cabin pressurisation doesn't explain why they went to 5k feet over the Alps.
It's not structural break-up because the plane was found in one place and the descent was fairly constant.
There's no obvious reason to suspect terrorism, because there was time to make a distress call.
Engine failure seems to be the obvious cause, but was the continuous 3k/minute descent consistent with that? Should the plane have been able to descend more slowly, if only to buy time to restart the engines?
Could the pilots have attempted to divert? Given that losing altitude over the Alps means CFIT is guaranteed if the engines didn't restart, whereas there might have been a chance of a somewhat more controlled landing on flatter ground, why does the plane appear not to have diverted from its flight path whatsoever?
At a slower rate of descent, they *might* have been able to divert (into NCE?) from their original flight path, had they begun to turn when the emergency was declared.
Loss of cabin pressurisation doesn't explain why they went to 5k feet over the Alps.
It's not structural break-up because the plane was found in one place and the descent was fairly constant.
There's no obvious reason to suspect terrorism, because there was time to make a distress call.
Engine failure seems to be the obvious cause, but was the continuous 3k/minute descent consistent with that? Should the plane have been able to descend more slowly, if only to buy time to restart the engines?
Could the pilots have attempted to divert? Given that losing altitude over the Alps means CFIT is guaranteed if the engines didn't restart, whereas there might have been a chance of a somewhat more controlled landing on flatter ground, why does the plane appear not to have diverted from its flight path whatsoever?
#72
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
Being physically fit, reading the emergency producers card etc all help. Not in every accident, but these are mercifully rare.
*http://www.livescience.com/38015-how...rash-ntsb.html
#73
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin and Southern France
Programs: Delta Platinum, Delta MM; HH Diamond, Starwood Platinum, ICH Platinum Ambassador, Hertz Gold
Posts: 745
#74
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 8,460
Not actually true, 95% of those involved in a aircraft accident survive* and picking a row within 4 seats of an exit massivley increases your chance of survival.
Being physically fit, reading the emergency producers card etc all help. Not in every accident, but these are mercifully rare.
*http://www.livescience.com/38015-how...rash-ntsb.html
Being physically fit, reading the emergency producers card etc all help. Not in every accident, but these are mercifully rare.
*http://www.livescience.com/38015-how...rash-ntsb.html
What good are emergency procedures if your plane breaks up at 30,000 feet? What good is an exit row? I guess you'll be the first one to get sucked out if a window shatters.