Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > Japan
Reload this Page >

What is going on at NRT?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What is going on at NRT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2006, 3:31 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TX, USA
Programs: AA DL UR AGR
Posts: 198
What is going on at NRT?

I was passing through Narita yesterday and noticed that some things had apparently changed for the worse. For starters the airport was surprisingly smelly in at least one spot and generally louder than before. I'm talking about T1 here, not that poorly maintained hallway known as T2. Is T1 in the middle of some plumbing problems and has the noise-canceling system been disabled?

NRT's T1 used to be among the best terminals in the business but now they seem to be slacking a bit. In fact the smell was so bad in one place (Kaizosha 3F) that I actually lost my appetite and blew off my usual stopover meal (gyoza followed by a slice of crepe cake). I was also dismayed that the duty-free shop refused to sell me my liquor selection. I'm not sure what the real problem was, but one lady implied that it was due to the TSA rules. Not only did the TSA relax that silly liquids rule some time ago but this particular intra-Asia flight had nothing to do with the US anyway. Luckily I managed to find another store that had the same selection and didn't have any problem selling it to me. All in all I'm seeing previously polished NRT in a new, lesser light at this point. Hopefully this is just a one-off situation and they'll get their act together again. With top-notch gateways in Asia becoming more common and new longer-haul planes available NRT might end up losing even more ground in near future, regardless of slot restrictions and the like.

At least NRT still has their well-maintained shower rooms. I seriously wish every airport had those. Nothing is worse than arriving at a US gateway after some long haul flight only to find out that they have no place to wash up.
DaxOmni is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 6:10 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,988
Originally Posted by DaxOmni
I was also dismayed that the duty-free shop refused to sell me my liquor selection. I'm not sure what the real problem was, but one lady implied that it was due to the TSA rules. Not only did the TSA relax that silly liquids rule some time ago but this particular intra-Asia flight had nothing to do with the US anyway.
Was the flight on UA or NW? If so, then US rules applied.
Steve M is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 6:19 pm
  #3  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,585
Please continue to follow this thread in the FT Japan Forum.
Thanks...
Obscure2k
TravelBuzz Moderator
obscure2k is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 8:32 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,218
In my opinion, NRT has always been a dump relative to its Asian gateway competitors (HKG, ICN, SIN). I don't think it has gotten any better or worse, still remains an inconvenient, depressing dump, not much worse, not much better. The addition of T2 and a 10-year remodeling exercise didn't really do much to improve things.

Of course, I'd take NRT over pretty much all of the US gateway airports. If you want the gold standard in inconvenient and depressing, those are your role models.
Pickles is online now  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:13 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
Originally Posted by Pickles
In my opinion, NRT has always been a dump relative to its Asian gateway competitors (HKG, ICN, SIN). I don't think it has gotten any better or worse, still remains an inconvenient, depressing dump, not much worse, not much better. The addition of T2 and a 10-year remodeling exercise didn't really do much to improve things.

Of course, I'd take NRT over pretty much all of the US gateway airports. If you want the gold standard in inconvenient and depressing, those are your role models.
Its still almost depressing to see how KIX as an alternative gateway to Japan was mishandled in most aspects. Of course, it could still be saved easily by adding a Shinkansen track and stations at the airport and either Shin-Osaka or another location. The cost would of course be immense but then there have been funnier ideas realized in Japan.
mosburger is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 10:24 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,449
There seems to be a new anti-liquid crusade at NRT -- discussed in this thread:http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showt...ht=nrt+liquids
Telfes is offline  
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:27 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: UA MP
Posts: 1,659
NRT is slightly less dumpy than before. There's the problem that it's in the middle of nowhere in Chiba. I don't ever think it was as dumpy as the old BKK or HKG (but obviously never as convenient). KIX isn't that bad overall (unlike NRT operators and rice farmers). And I think it's a lot better for someone living in Osaka than NRT is for someone in Tokyo. Most airports seem mismanaged (I've always liked how Chicago has managed ORD and MDW) though, with organizations that can't get their act together.
acregal is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2006, 4:28 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TX, USA
Programs: AA DL UR AGR
Posts: 198
Originally Posted by Steve M
Was the flight on UA or NW? If so, then US rules applied.
What do the US rules say about inter-Asian flights and why would they be even more restrictive than US-Asian flights? That simply doesn't make any sense to me.

Originally Posted by Pickles
I don't think it has gotten any better or worse, still remains an inconvenient, depressing dump, not much worse, not much better. The addition of T2 and a 10-year remodeling exercise didn't really do much to improve things.
The new terminal is actually called Terminal One and it's vastly superior to Terminal Two in my view. However, it's certainly gotten worse of late, at least according to my ears and nose.

Originally Posted by mosburger
Its still almost depressing to see how KIX as an alternative gateway to Japan was mishandled in most aspects. Of course, it could still be saved easily by adding a Shinkansen track and stations at the airport and either Shin-Osaka or another location. The cost would of course be immense but then there have been funnier ideas realized in Japan.
KIX has all the makings of a bottomless money pit. Thus, even poorly maintained NRT makes more sense than expanding KIX in my view.
DaxOmni is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2006, 6:53 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 9,678
Originally Posted by DaxOmni
What do the US rules say about inter-Asian flights and why would they be even more restrictive than US-Asian flights? That simply doesn't make any sense to me.
I think the US rules have implications for airports where some passengers are allowed to carry liquids into the landside area. (So in the case of Narita, if they're allowing passengers on flights to some destinations to take a bottle of water which was purchased outside of the airport, then they have to do an extra security kabuki on the ramp for any flights to the US or on US airlines)

Actually I think Narita security checks are more relaxed than those at US airports - and so, ironically, they are required to do extra checks on US airlines.

Originally Posted by DaxOmni
The new terminal is actually called Terminal One and it's vastly superior to Terminal Two in my view. However, it's certainly gotten worse of late, at least according to my ears and nose.
Terminal Two is the newer of the two terminals. It currently has some building work going on to create some new duty free stores - I believe it will lose the feeling of a dreary hallway when that's completed. I used to prefer T2 to T1...

Rennovation of Terminal One was completed this year - with a brand new South Wing. That might create the impression that it's a new terminal.
jib71 is online now  
Old Dec 6, 2006, 3:15 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,218
Originally Posted by DaxOmni
The new terminal is actually called Terminal One and it's vastly superior to Terminal Two in my view. However, it's certainly gotten worse of late, at least according to my ears and nose.
It is? I must have my arrow of time reversed, because in my universe (and I believe also Smidgen's), T1 opened circa 1971 and T2 opened circa 1994. Do you think I can see a doctor about that?
Pickles is online now  
Old Dec 6, 2006, 9:18 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TX, USA
Programs: AA DL UR AGR
Posts: 198
If I'm wrong about the Terminals then please accept my apologies. To my eyes T1 has looked decades newer than T2 for years now and the difference is never more striking than seeing them back to back with one of those old school bus transfers. Seriously, NRT's T2 looks very old to my eyes. What's odd is that the NAA lists the grand opening of T1 as June 2nd, 2006 (Page 7 from the 2006 edition of the "Narita Airport Guidebook A to Z Terminal 1"). I guess they're talking about the recent musical chairs renovation work because we all know that T1 was up and running long before that.
DaxOmni is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 5:17 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Premier, SWA Rapid Rewards, Alaska Air Mileage Plan, AAdvantage, CX Marco Polo
Posts: 544
Originally Posted by Pickles
It is? I must have my arrow of time reversed, because in my universe (and I believe also Smidgen's), T1 opened circa 1971 and T2 opened circa 1994. Do you think I can see a doctor about that?
Narita opened for operations in 1978, delayed for several years due to public protests (some which were violent) and political wrangling. I think the passenger terminal building (today's T1) was actually finished around 1974 but it stood idle due to the problems mentioned above.

T2 did open around the time you mentioned. T1 as noted was extensively renovated and expanded over the last few years, so it appears to be newer (expecially around the UA gate areas). I think the plan is to have the Star Alliance carriers congregate at T1 (I think NH moved there recently).
silverkris168 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2006, 11:11 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ani Ichibanya
Programs: WWMFD
Posts: 6,292
It's a marvel of modern engineering and beauty for those of us used to JFK or LGA.
kcvt750 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2006, 3:45 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,667
Originally Posted by silverkris168
Narita opened for operations in 1978, delayed for several years due to public protests (some which were violent) and political wrangling. I think the passenger terminal building (today's T1) was actually finished around 1974 but it stood idle due to the problems mentioned above.

T2 did open around the time you mentioned. T1 as noted was extensively renovated and expanded over the last few years, so it appears to be newer (expecially around the UA gate areas). I think the plan is to have the Star Alliance carriers congregate at T1 (I think NH moved there recently).
The entire *A grouping(except ANZ) moved to the new T1 South terminal on 2/June/2006..........
Q Shoe Guy is offline  
Old Dec 13, 2006, 11:41 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Rafael, CA
Programs: Life SPG Plat, 7X NH DIA
Posts: 2,840
The view from my seat in the NH F lounge in the new T1 South Wing right now is very nice. I went down and slummed a bit with the other gaijin and grabbed a McBurger for lunch though.

Of course dinner will be caviar and Krug...

I think the new South Wing is a fabulous place. Sometimes I even start to think that I can walk on water around here

Bon Voyage,

Scho
schoflyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.