Am I required to catch my connection (flight)??
#16
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: SMF, OAK, SFO, SJC, SCK
Posts: 5
Sorry I'm new to travel hacking and I'm a bit confused about this topic. I've read blogs where people would purposely buy airplane tickets that stop in 2 or more countries and visit those 2 stops at their leisure. Isn't he talking about the same thing?
#17
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ECP
Programs: DL Diamond
Posts: 1,658
That said, it's perfectly within the airline rules, and while perhaps not exactly what they intend for you to do, it doesn't violate any rules.
#18
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: SMF, OAK, SFO, SJC, SCK
Posts: 5
It sounded like he was doing it for longer but maybe I misunderstood. This is one of the blogs where I was reading it from.http://freakinflyers.com/stopovers/ He talks about stopovers and open jaws.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento
Programs: UA 2MM/GS; SPG Lifetime Plat; MHC Lifetime; Tar Heel forever; and I "Dig the Pig" at Piggly Wiggly
Posts: 12,152
I guess what I still don't understand is why it's so much cheaper. On that return leg, the 2nd airport (SFO) and the 4th/final airport (SJC) is only 30 min apart BY CAR. Why are they willing to knock off $150 if I take 2 extra legs + 5hrs flying/waiting at the airports? It's not like I was looking for special loopholes - it just came up on a regular search for a roundtrip flight between SFO <>KOA, allowing for nearby airports.
I was playing around, trying to get the prices down. Was surprised to find out SFO-FRA was $8000 each way. Even booking on the exact same SFO-FRA-SFO flights, by continuing FRA-ATH-FRA brought the price down $2000 each direction.
Go figure.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Everywhere
Programs: AA EXP - 3.7MM, Bonv LIFETIME Titan, HH Dmd, Hyatt Glob., Priority Clb Dmd, Ntnl Exec El., Sixt PLT
Posts: 1,680
I'm looking for flights from San Francisco to Kona, Hawaii and I found that the cheapest flight for the particular dates I want looks something like this:
Depart: SFO > KOA
Return: KOA > SFO > Los Angeles (LAX) > San Jose (SJC)
If I book that above itinerary, it's about $150 CHEAPER than if I book the same trip but end it at SFO. I would like to book it and just not catch that flight down to LA and back up to San Jose and take a train from San Jose back to SFO... that'd just be crazy.
Depart: SFO > KOA
Return: KOA > SFO > Los Angeles (LAX) > San Jose (SJC)
If I book that above itinerary, it's about $150 CHEAPER than if I book the same trip but end it at SFO. I would like to book it and just not catch that flight down to LA and back up to San Jose and take a train from San Jose back to SFO... that'd just be crazy.
1) Flights to/from SJC to Hawaii are usually cheaper vs. SFO because of competition (e.g., AS is flying to some of the islands non-stop).
2) At least some of us would not mind logging in two extra segments (SFO-LAX-SJC) for extra redeemable and qualifications miles and saving $150!
3) If you still like to skip the last two legs, try booking your tickets with the minimal connection time at SFO (perhaps, 30 min? - I do not know what is the legal connection time for UA at SFO) If you miss your connecting SFO-LAX flight, you would have some good chances to talk the gate agent to get off your trip at SFO without being accommodated at a later flight.
4) If you book way in advance, there is a good chance that the schedule would change. If changes are > 2 hrs you would have a good case to ask the airline to reroute you to another city (like SFO). Once I have asked AA and was rerouted from DFW-WAS to DFW-RIC simply because of the schedule change for the original flights.
Of course, 3) and 4) are about taking chances but SJC<->SFO is not such a big deal.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,194
It sort of works like this:
UA has a near-monopoly on the KOA-SFO route, so fares are high.
AS files a semi-cheap sale fare on their KOA-SJC nonstop.
UA is scanning their competitors' fares one day and sees this. They think, "Crap; we're losing business on the KOA-SJC city pair. We'd better file a matching fare." They do.
Then, the UA fare-filing people look at their network. They notice they don't have any KOA-SJC nonstops. The fare for that city pair exists and they want the business; now they have to figure out how to get people between the two cities.
They make a list of all of the possible ways to get from KOA to SJC on their network. Probably the most obvious is KOA-LAX-SJC (they have a direct KOA-LAX flight). But they have to be thorough, because they don't want to miss any opportunities to snag the price-sensitive people away from AS, so they want to publish a routing that allows travel on KOA-SFO, too (since that's the route that has the most seats available). Unfortunately, there aren't any SFO-SJC flights (it's too short!). So, what's the fastest way to get to SJC from SFO? Via LAX. And boom, you have it!
KOA-SFO-LAX-SJC
For what it's worth, here's the routing as filed on a typical UA KOA-SJC fare:
1. KOA-HNL/ITO/LAX/SFO-LAX/SFO-SJC
That breaks into this:
[KOA] --> [HNL or ITO or LAX or SFO] --> [LAX or SFO] --> SJC
Now obviously, the most logical routing permitted by the fare is KOA-LAX-SJC (the fare-booking engine can skip a step). Second to that would probably be KOA-HNL-LAX-SJC or maybe KOA-ITO-LAX-SJC (if the KOA-LAX nonstop is sold out). But you can see how the fare rules actually do permit the KOA-SFO-LAX-SJC routing. Even though it makes absolutely no sense to most people why two extra segments would be $150 cheaper, now you know that it has absolutely nothing to do with the fare that's filed on the KOA-SFO nonstop flight and everything to do with the competition in the KOA-SJC market...and the reason you can get on the same plane and pay less by going on to somewhere else is mostly due to fact that UA's route network allows (and/or even in some cases requires) your itinerary to follow a particular route, even if others getting off earlier are paying more.
That help?