Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Should Jet do BLR-BRU-SFO instead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 1:02 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco area
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott T
Posts: 509
Should Jet do BLR-BRU-SFO instead?

How many India bound pax would Jet carry to DEL/MAA if this flights matched with its existing BRU operations? Still would carry all the BOM bound passengers.
bdhaliwa is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 8:30 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: Marriott Platinum, HH Diamond
Posts: 125
9W cannot increase flights at BRU because of slot restrictions since any new flight have to match the existing bank of flight times to US/India.

To your question if they offer SFO connection, there will be a good number of connecting passengers to DEL/MAA as most of them currently use SQ/Cathay.
Colts_01 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 6:10 am
  #3  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA & MCO
Programs: DL Diamond, AA EXP & UA Gold
Posts: 3,051
Originally Posted by Colts_01
9W cannot increase flights at BRU because of slot restrictions since any new flight have to match the existing bank of flight times to US/India.
You mean Jet can't add more flight in/out of BRU during their preferred times (7:40 AM to 11:40 AM)?

Wow--they've just started their ops there an they are already maxed out on capacity? Wonder why they didn't think of expansion before they selected BRU. I would have thought they would eventually want to add more U.S. cities as well as HYD and BLR.
Babu is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.