New National Security Law---concerns transiting in HK
#31
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
#32
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,097
I'm not saying for certain it happens, but if you're involved in Hong Kong-related protests overseas, your working assumption should be that faces are somehow being collected and identified if they can. (There are some extremely powerful facial recognition systems out there that sweep the Web for a match.)
Doesn't mean any action will necessarily be taken if you visit HK, but that you have been marked.
Doesn't mean any action will necessarily be taken if you visit HK, but that you have been marked.
#33
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PMD
Programs: UA*G, NW, AA-G. WR-P, HH-G, IHG-S, ALL. TT-GE.
Posts: 2,911
After the boat of 12 illegally exited HK intending to seek refuge in TW was intercepted in international waters in the 12-24 nautical mile contiguous zone and taken to Shenzhen (but broke no obvious PRC law) and so far not transferred to HK authorities, you can assume the PRC will take any infraction of HK law into its own hand.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
In other word, if you are in a protest that urge Carrie Lam to resign, that should be fine, providing that there is no other applicable law prohibiting that.
#36
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 812
If you were ever involved in a protest against the PRC and/or Hong Kong government, and your face was fully visible at any point during the protest, I would avoid traveling to or transiting in any place under the control of the PRC, including Hong Kong.
As has been mentioned, facial recognition software has become incredibly powerful, and the safe assumption with any protest is someone was recording it.
As has been mentioned, facial recognition software has become incredibly powerful, and the safe assumption with any protest is someone was recording it.
#37
Join Date: Sep 2019
Programs: Asia Miles
Posts: 10
After the boat of 12 illegally exited HK intending to seek refuge in TW was intercepted in international waters in the 12-24 nautical mile contiguous zone and taken to Shenzhen (but broke no obvious PRC law) and so far not transferred to HK authorities, you can assume the PRC will take any infraction of HK law into its own hand.
After the boat of 12 PEOPLE SKIPPING BAIL illegally exited HK (you wrote this yourself, but it's a major point in this) intending to seek refuge in TW was intercepted in POSSIBLY international waters in the 12-24 nautical mile contiguous zone and taken to Shenzhen (but broke no obvious PRC law) -- OF COURSE THEY BROKE THE LAW, THEY ALREADY HAVE RIOTING CHARGES OUTSTANDING, AND WERE SKIPPING BAIL -- and so far not transferred to HK authorities, you can assume the PRC will take any infraction of HK law into its own hand.
They ILLEGALLY EXITED HONG KONG. BOOM. CRIME RIGHT THERE.
#38
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Let's fix your statement.
After the boat of 12 PEOPLE SKIPPING BAIL illegally exited HK (you wrote this yourself, but it's a major point in this) intending to seek refuge in TW was intercepted in POSSIBLY international waters in the 12-24 nautical mile contiguous zone and taken to Shenzhen (but broke no obvious PRC law) -- OF COURSE THEY BROKE THE LAW, THEY ALREADY HAVE RIOTING CHARGES OUTSTANDING, AND WERE SKIPPING BAIL -- and so far not transferred to HK authorities, you can assume the PRC will take any infraction of HK law into its own hand.
They ILLEGALLY EXITED HONG KONG. BOOM. CRIME RIGHT THERE.
After the boat of 12 PEOPLE SKIPPING BAIL illegally exited HK (you wrote this yourself, but it's a major point in this) intending to seek refuge in TW was intercepted in POSSIBLY international waters in the 12-24 nautical mile contiguous zone and taken to Shenzhen (but broke no obvious PRC law) -- OF COURSE THEY BROKE THE LAW, THEY ALREADY HAVE RIOTING CHARGES OUTSTANDING, AND WERE SKIPPING BAIL -- and so far not transferred to HK authorities, you can assume the PRC will take any infraction of HK law into its own hand.
They ILLEGALLY EXITED HONG KONG. BOOM. CRIME RIGHT THERE.
#40
Yet, Pinoys are still one of the largest groups seeking visas...things have to be quite bad in other countries to want to come to the US.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
Actually, the State Department has made this "question" permanent for everyone for both non-immigrant and immigrant visas.
#42
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,802
Both accounts are on two separate phones, tho like symbols of Scotland, the China phone only goes into China.
#44
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CRK MNL
Programs: CX Gold
Posts: 1,288
For most pinoys, the US is still the land of opportunity. With so many friends and relatives living in the US, they have places to stay and eat for free while looking for jobs.
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,689
I have three handsets activated as I need two separate Google accounts for HK and Canada on top of the China e-comm/SM account.