American Studying Frontier Merger
Jul 10, 2012 | 8:08 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
American Studying Frontier Merger
American is looking at five possible partners for merger:
USAirways
JetBlue
Alaska
Frontier
Virgin America
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/americ...003453922.html
I would not exactly bet the farm on a F9+AA combo, but it's more than just baseless junk somebody dreamt up. If nothing else it can lead to fun speculation, especially in a multi-airline combination.
That Virgin is included really makes me wonder how serious they are about each of the airlines mentioned. I don't think Virgin America brings much to the table. But who knows...
USAirways
JetBlue
Alaska
Frontier
Virgin America
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/americ...003453922.html
I would not exactly bet the farm on a F9+AA combo, but it's more than just baseless junk somebody dreamt up. If nothing else it can lead to fun speculation, especially in a multi-airline combination.
That Virgin is included really makes me wonder how serious they are about each of the airlines mentioned. I don't think Virgin America brings much to the table. But who knows...
Jul 11, 2012 | 6:40 am
#3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: DEN - Ft. Collins
Programs: PC Plat, HHonors Silver
Posts: 145
Frontier sure would give them a bigger base in DEN, but United would still dominate it.
Jul 11, 2012 | 10:42 am
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 28,764
Frontier plus American Airlines?
I'd say that the odds are low, but it's interesting to see this reported:
http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/mo...le+Feedfetcher
http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/mo...le+Feedfetcher
Jul 11, 2012 | 5:52 pm
#5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The views I express here are not necessarily supported by any airline or codeshare partners, nor do I represent their views and/or opinions. They are my own OPINIONS dont like them dont read them.....
Posts: 1,462
Although a combination of US/AA/F9/RAH is not totally out of the question. RAH still owns a large amount of US's debt, slots at DCA and the fleet types match USs current model and AA's intended model. SOOOOOOOO not out of the question.....
Jul 11, 2012 | 7:33 pm
#6
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: British Airways, Delta
Posts: 33
I think so
The New York post today said Jet Blue doesnt want America.
Alska doesn't need that mess
Virgin America ( American will never give up the BA relationship)
Frontier? Best bet. Republic would also love to get the regional flying for American Eagle.
Alska doesn't need that mess
Virgin America ( American will never give up the BA relationship)
Frontier? Best bet. Republic would also love to get the regional flying for American Eagle.
Jul 11, 2012 | 9:14 pm
#7
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: UA Premier
Posts: 193
Republic/F9 will not be successful anywhere until it aligns itself with a major loyalty program. Could F9 be positioning for an acquisition?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...le-planes.html
If I'm AA, I realize consolidation is essential. I don't want to have anything to do with US. AS is successful on their own (not looking to merge) and doesn't offer any value (N-S network, no TPAC). Getting in to the DEN market is risky, but if I am in fact considering bringing Airbus on the property, and RAH offers F9 assets for "cheap," F9 may be attractive. JetBlue has lost its glamor as well, and additional market share in NYC may be something I'm interested in by purchasing B6.
Mergers / acquisitions are difficult. Two mergers / acquisitions are even more painful. Speculation: look for AA to acquire either B6 or F9. F9's LOI with Airbus may be a strategic move to attract a buyer, especially considering the C-Series order. 160 new airplanes doesn't make sense. F9/RAH is up to something... Maybe courting AA for an F9 purchase?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...le-planes.html
If I'm AA, I realize consolidation is essential. I don't want to have anything to do with US. AS is successful on their own (not looking to merge) and doesn't offer any value (N-S network, no TPAC). Getting in to the DEN market is risky, but if I am in fact considering bringing Airbus on the property, and RAH offers F9 assets for "cheap," F9 may be attractive. JetBlue has lost its glamor as well, and additional market share in NYC may be something I'm interested in by purchasing B6.
Mergers / acquisitions are difficult. Two mergers / acquisitions are even more painful. Speculation: look for AA to acquire either B6 or F9. F9's LOI with Airbus may be a strategic move to attract a buyer, especially considering the C-Series order. 160 new airplanes doesn't make sense. F9/RAH is up to something... Maybe courting AA for an F9 purchase?
And my post was generally scoffed... hmm...
Jul 12, 2012 | 6:57 am
#8
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
I believe they sold the slots back to them to raise capital awhile back. But yes there is more than a friendly relationship between RAH and US. Even if it is a US/AA merger with no one else you can bet RAH will be at the table to secure more CPA flying.
Jul 12, 2012 | 10:59 am
#9
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Have Amex, will travel...
Programs: HHonors Gold
Posts: 91
Here's an interesting article that basically spells out why US Airways is the only merger that really makes sense:
http://www.azcentral.com/business/ar...s-options.html
I'd love to see a F9/AA merger for selfish reasons, such as being able to fly nonstop from SLC to Dallas on F9, but it doesn't make much sense to me, either.
http://www.azcentral.com/business/ar...s-options.html
I'd love to see a F9/AA merger for selfish reasons, such as being able to fly nonstop from SLC to Dallas on F9, but it doesn't make much sense to me, either.
Jul 12, 2012 | 3:10 pm
#10
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: UA Premier
Posts: 193
I'm not sure why everyone is fixated on "complementary route structures." As said in another thread, AA can start service between just about any two cities it wants. AA has already proven through the TWA and Reno mergers that they have very little interest in maintaining hubs gained through merger.
AA may want to accelerate MD-80 retirements with 40 or so F9 Airbuses while bringing some working aircraft knowledge on property.
AA may want to accelerate MD-80 retirements with 40 or so F9 Airbuses while bringing some working aircraft knowledge on property.
Last edited by Pigeye01; Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 pm
Jul 12, 2012 | 3:58 pm
#11
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The views I express here are not necessarily supported by any airline or codeshare partners, nor do I represent their views and/or opinions. They are my own OPINIONS dont like them dont read them.....
Posts: 1,462
Furthermore both US and AA are going to need pilots and it would be easier to "acquire" than "hire" in this market
Last edited by cwe84; Jul 12, 2012 at 4:03 pm
Jul 12, 2012 | 6:57 pm
#12
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: UA Premier
Posts: 193
There are plenty of qualified and available pilots for hire. For instance, it's my understanding that Fed Ex has over 10,000 pilot applications on file, including, I bet, just about every competitive RAH pilot.
Jul 13, 2012 | 7:10 am
#13
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....L3BhZ2UvNzQ%3d
Under section 7, it says:
The Company had airport commuter slots and had assigned the right of use for these commuter slots to US Airways. On December 20, 2011, US Airways repurchased the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport ("DCA") commuter slots for $47.5 million and a gain on sale of assets was recognized of $2.3 million.