Conference Call Notes
#31
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
If Frontier joins forces with another carrier, is this a reasonable scenario?
http://crankyflier.com/2011/06/13/wh...uire-frontier/
http://crankyflier.com/2011/06/13/wh...uire-frontier/
#32
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CONUS
Posts: 474
What do you think he should have done differently? Not fully defending him (wish he would have given the Q400s a better shot), but taking 2 failing airlines and merging them while being under siege at their 2 largest hubs and a skyrocketing price of oil is not an easy task. Did they bite off more than they can chew? Maybe. But at this point it is too late and it is at least an entertaining airline to follow.
Last edited by N522US; Jun 13, 2011 at 7:12 pm
#33
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
I'm not sure that JetBlue would want to take a large risk by acquiring or merging with F9, but a full codeshare agreement would surely be beneficial to both carriers. It would get F9 passengers more access on the coasts and carribean and JetBlue passengers access to the interior of the country.
#34
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
What do you think he should have done differently? Not fully defending him (wish he would have given the Q400s a better shot), but taking 2 failing airlines and merging them while being under siege at their 2 largest hubs and a skyrocketing price of oil is not an easy task. Did they bite off more than they can chew? Maybe. But at this point it is too late and it is at least an entertaining airline to follow.
Or to backup a few years maybe not even entertain the F9/YX deal and hope Republic can buy more larger aircraft to operate for other carriers since few were buying new aircraft for the shorter routes.
One thing is for certain at some point he decided he was "all in" if you're a poker player.
Hindsight is always 20/20. But the fat lady might be warming up. The FAPA agreement doesn't cover all they seem to be losing and the lowest travel highest loss Sep-Oct months fall well before most of the gains will be appreciated.
#35
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: UA Premier
Posts: 193
Hope something viable comes along for the employees...
#36
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
Or to backup a few years maybe not even entertain the F9/YX deal and hope Republic can buy more larger aircraft to operate for other carriers since few were buying new aircraft for the shorter routes.
One thing is for certain at some point he decided he was "all in" if you're a poker player.
Hindsight is always 20/20. But the fat lady might be warming up. The FAPA agreement doesn't cover all they seem to be losing and the lowest travel highest loss Sep-Oct months fall well before most of the gains will be appreciated.
One thing is for certain at some point he decided he was "all in" if you're a poker player.
Hindsight is always 20/20. But the fat lady might be warming up. The FAPA agreement doesn't cover all they seem to be losing and the lowest travel highest loss Sep-Oct months fall well before most of the gains will be appreciated.
On the other hand, they are definitely not "all in" at this point. F9 is only one part of their business and currently the CPA side is very successful. If they decide that F9 is no longer viable they can let F9 file bankruptcy but that does not mean RJET files for bankruptcy. They are 2 different entities.
#37
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
[QUOTE=MikeFromMKE;16556271On the other hand, they are definitely not "all in" at this point. F9 is only one part of their business and currently the CPA side is very successful. If they decide that F9 is no longer viable they can let F9 file bankruptcy but that does not mean RJET files for bankruptcy. They are 2 different entities.[/QUOTE]
So they could decide F9 jetsam and still carry on?
I thought it was RJET unrestricted cash that was the problem I didn't realize they could throw F9 under the bus and exit so easily.
If they do that they also pass a lot of debt to F9 and RJET survives. Very interesting.
So they could decide F9 jetsam and still carry on?
I thought it was RJET unrestricted cash that was the problem I didn't realize they could throw F9 under the bus and exit so easily.
If they do that they also pass a lot of debt to F9 and RJET survives. Very interesting.
#38
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
I don't think its necessarily an easy process, but they are separate legal entities, and RJET is just the umbrella corporation that owns the company called Frontier. Frontier could file for bankruptcy independently of the parent company, but it isn't like that wouldn't have an effect on RJET stock. RJET would be able to survive without going under.
#39

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
#40

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
I don't think its necessarily an easy process, but they are separate legal entities, and RJET is just the umbrella corporation that owns the company called Frontier. Frontier could file for bankruptcy independently of the parent company, but it isn't like that wouldn't have an effect on RJET stock. RJET would be able to survive without going under.
James Reichart, Republic's vice president of sales, distribution, and loyalty programs, said bankruptcy protection "is not something we're considering" for Frontier.
"We're doing the tough stuff to build a business that can generate positive returns, even at very high fuel prices," he said of Frontier.
"We're doing the tough stuff to build a business that can generate positive returns, even at very high fuel prices," he said of Frontier.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,809
I'm not sure that JetBlue would want to take a large risk by acquiring or merging with F9, but a full codeshare agreement would surely be beneficial to both carriers. It would get F9 passengers more access on the coasts and carribean and JetBlue passengers access to the interior of the country.
#42
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MKE
Programs: Delta Skymiles, Frontier EarlyReturns Summit
Posts: 766
I am for a standard codeshare agreement, nothing more. I don't see how that would have a negative effect on either carrier, especially since they don't share any routes.
#43
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CONUS
Posts: 474
And what a mess that was. People was essentially today's Spirit; Frontier was still holding on to its full-service model. You could buy tickets on either carrier and crossover to the others route system by flying EWR-DEN. Once People decided to force its fee-for-all system and rock-bottom fares on Frontier, it was done in 6 months.
#44
Join Date: Oct 2010
Programs: My opinions are my own and not that of my employer(s)
Posts: 1,411
I'd think it would be hard to sell any code share when F9 is at 95% holdback on credit cards. (it was at 100% until they found a processor that agreed to 95%)
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,809
i hadn't thought of that -- that's very true. It's hard to come back from F9's financial-red-zone status... it becomes a self-fullfilling prophecy.

