Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Frontier growth plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 12:21 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
Frontier growth plans

From the Denver Business Journal...expansion in the east?

http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver...8400%5E3422431
mke9499 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 3:54 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
The two paragraphs below taken from the Business Journal article provide some good hints about where Frontier might be looking to next for expansion:

"While he wouldnt say where Frontier is eyeing for its next expansion, he said that move is likely to be at a location that does not have a lot of direct flights to Denver by another low-cost airline already.

The way were going to grow is we bring differentiation, Shurz said. If we fly to markets that no one else flies to, that brings differentiation in general.

Some of Frontier's new routes in markets once dominated by Delta and United seem to be doing very well. Madison in particular has been gangbuster from the outset and is being up-gauged to an A318 this July. Green Bay has been seeing good loads as well.

It wouldn't be too shocking to see some new service/additions in places like Des Moines, Ft. Wayne, Madison, Omaha, Pittsburgh, Sun Valley, or even Duluth (sum of which are offering incentives). There might even be a few more international routes that could work from the hubs or key spoke cities.

It will be interesting to see what they have planned.
BlueHorseShoe2000 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 4:35 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Originally Posted by BlueHorseShoe2000
Madison in particular has been gangbuster from the outset and is being up-gauged to an A318 this July. Green Bay has been seeing good loads as well.

It will be interesting to see what they have planned.
Might we see AirTran begin service to Madison and Green Bay?
RSVP is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 5:07 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,638
Originally Posted by BlueHorseShoe2000
The two paragraphs below taken from the Business Journal article provide some good hints about where Frontier might be looking to next for expansion:

"While he wouldnt say where Frontier is eyeing for its next expansion, he said that move is likely to be at a location that does not have a lot of direct flights to Denver by another low-cost airline already.

The way were going to grow is we bring differentiation, Shurz said. If we fly to markets that no one else flies to, that brings differentiation in general.

It will be interesting to see what they have planned.
If you play the broadcast interview with the DBJ reporter, he talks about increased presence at DCA and LGA, if the slots are available.

He also talks about the brand recognition of F9 as a LCC, even in markets they currently don't serve.
mke9499 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 5:42 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
Originally Posted by mke9499
If you play the broadcast interview with the DBJ reporter, he talks about increased presence at DCA and LGA, if the slots are available.
Frontier definately wants to add more flights to DCA and LGA but slots aren't available (at least at a decent price).

The DOT ruled Republic was not a limited incumbent carrier at LGA or DCA and therefore isn't eligible to purchase/bid on any slots that might become available if Delta/U.S. Airways go ahead with the slot swap. Republic has a large portfolio of slots at DCA and LGA that they purchased a few years back and now lease to U.S. Airways.

Unless circumstances change significantly, the best Frontier can hope for is securing another slot or two to beef-up the MKE, MCI, or DEN routes.
BlueHorseShoe2000 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 5:47 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,800
Originally Posted by RSVP
Might we see AirTran begin service to Madison and Green Bay?
If AirTran makes adjustments to the SkyWest flying, I could certainly see something like MSN or GRR being added.

I guess it depends how much SkyWest wants to lose on all of their at-risk flying for AirTran in MKE.
BlueHorseShoe2000 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 7:39 pm
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,110
Originally Posted by RSVP
Might we see AirTran begin service to Madison and Green Bay?
Yes, I think so. FL could be done extremely performance very well. Let's find out for which the specific routes will be choose.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 8:24 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MKE
Posts: 2,161
Originally Posted by BlueHorseShoe2000
If AirTran makes adjustments to the SkyWest flying, I could certainly see something like MSN or GRR being added.
If anything. I can't see AirTran deploying a 717 in either market, as their fleet is already spread thin. No additional aircraft until next year.
RSVP is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 8:55 pm
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,110
Originally Posted by RSVP
If anything. I can't see AirTran deploying a 717 in either market, as their fleet is already spread thin. No additional aircraft until next year.
Maybe if Lynx or Skywest will have to bring more CRJ or turboprop aircraft out of MKE or DEN.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 9:08 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I80
Programs: N23344
Posts: 173
Originally Posted by BlueHorseShoe2000

I guess it depends how much SkyWest wants to lose on all of their at-risk flying for AirTran in MKE.
With AirTran dictating the fares on the Skywest flights I'm not sure if Skywest is seeing any revenue from fares with the CRJ, lower fuel prices help though but it can't be all that great. I can see AirTran subsidising some of the routes if they are not preforming to Skywest's desires, even if it is "at-risk" for Skywest.

The flights have lasted longer than I thought they would especially with some of the loads they are getting.

Has Skywest added any flights since they started flying for Airtran?
8C4IOW is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 5:01 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
Originally Posted by 8C4IOW
Has Skywest added any flights since they started flying for Airtran?
They are serving the same six routes originally announced.

MKE-CAK and MKE-DSM have been cut from 3x to 2x.

With the slack capacity they are adding a 4th MKE-STL flight next week, and the new schedule has the STL flights running at off-bank times so there aren't a lot of good connections...but this may well work because this the CRJ route which has generated a lot of local traffic for them. AirTran has been in it longer (first as 717) and since American pulled out a few months ago, the only competition has been two daily 37-seat ER3's on Midwest, which run largely full. This market has frustrated me a little bit about the RAH schedulers because the traffic is there for more service and the ER3's pretty much sell out on peak days.

Here's the new schedule with the adjusted FL times to start next week:

MKE-STL
6:00am FL
8:40am YX/F9
10:34am FL
1:20pm FL
4:15pm YX/F9
5:39pm FL

STL-MKE
7:41am FL
11:10am YX/F9
12:41pm FL
3:00pm FL
6:00pm YX/F9
7:10pm FL
knope2001 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.