FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   External Miles and Points Resources (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/external-miles-points-resources-723/)
-   -   View from the Wing [VFTW] discussions (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/external-miles-points-resources/1579554-view-wing-vftw-discussions.html)

FallenPlat Apr 20, 2016 3:00 pm

From one of today's posts, I rather gather that Gary is a NeverTrump guy. It's his blog, of course, and he can say what he wants, but I don't read View from the Wing for its politics.

Others might like that stuff.

Personally, I like the airplanes and the travel. That's it.

sbm12 Apr 20, 2016 3:23 pm


Originally Posted by FallenPlat (Post 26513254)
...but I don't read View from the Wing for its politics.

Are you just now noticing that content in the posts? He does it relatively often IMO.

kokonutz Apr 20, 2016 5:53 pm


Originally Posted by FallenPlat (Post 26513254)
From one of today's posts, I rather gather that Gary is a NeverTrump guy. It's his blog, of course, and he can say what he wants, but I don't read View from the Wing for its politics.

Others might like that stuff.

Personally, I like the airplanes and the travel. That's it.

He's an avowed Koch-ian 'libertarian.'

chad75 Apr 20, 2016 9:26 pm


Originally Posted by kokonutz (Post 26513853)
He's an avowed Koch-ian 'libertarian.'

All power to the free market! Well, except for dynamic pricing of award bookings of course.

kokonutz Apr 21, 2016 7:01 am


Originally Posted by chad75 (Post 26514521)
All power to the free market! Well, except for dynamic pricing of award bookings of course.

Bad for award booking business doncha know!?


On a separate topic, I saw this and thought of VFTW: https://www.theinformation.com/escap...edia-crap-trap


Digital media companies are caught in the "crap trap," mass-producing trashy clickbait so they can claim huge audiences and often higher valuations.

Here is how they fell into this lethal trap: They got into the content game to produce news or info they might be proud of, believing they could lure us to read it and maybe even pay for it. They quickly realized it's expensive to produce quality content and hard to get a lot of people to click on it, much less pay for it. So they deluded themselves that the better play was to go for the biggest audience possible, using stupid web tricks to draw them in. These include misleading but clicky headlines, feel-good lists, sexy photos and exploding watermelons.

And it appeared to work. Traffic spiked. Costs were contained. But revenue never followed because everyone else was doing the same tricks and getting the same spikes—and the simple law of supply and demand drove down the value of their inventory. This dynamic helps explain why Mashable recently laid off so many journalists, BuzzFeed saw its growth miss the mark and many media companies and investors are freaked out.

Here's the good news: This era is getting flushed away. Some companies feel self-conscious about the trash they are producing. Many others realize it's simply not a good business model. But the savviest ones see a very cool reason to change: A content revolution is picking up speed, promising a profitable future for companies that can lock down loyal audiences, especially those built around higher-quality content.

nsx Apr 21, 2016 10:02 am


Originally Posted by kokonutz (Post 26515832)
A content revolution is picking up speed, promising a profitable future for companies that can lock down loyal audiences, especially those built around higher-quality content.

I haven't seen much evidence of this. These days I mostly read blogs which have very few but high-quality posts, but content still wants to be free. I think someone will always offer good content for free, just as FT does.

josephstern Apr 21, 2016 10:21 am

I've got to say, as the signal to noise ratio on this blog gets lower and lower, I'm soon to put it in the pile with TPG and MMS and FTG - all are gone from my Feedly, and even if I do a Google search and get a hit on one of those sites, I won't bother.

Gary seems to be just posting random thoughts these days. But I guess I do still get a little guilty pleasure reading about things as inane as the coffee filter scenario and how much nonsense he read into that situation. He's like a community college English teacher.

FallenPlat Apr 21, 2016 10:54 am

Yes, thanks for the reminder on the libertarian thing. I had forgotten.

I guess what really annoys me, as already noted immediately above, is the steadily deteriorating signal-to-noise ratio. I still tune in, but there sure is a lot of static -- and I don't just mean the click-bait titles either.

The quality is still there. That's why I read. You just have to look harder for it.

RFDMinnesota Apr 22, 2016 1:15 am

I'd much rather be known and respected by few than known by many without their respect.

I reckon (possibly first time I've ever used that word) Gary doesn't feel the same

Duke787 Apr 22, 2016 8:17 am

His response to TPG getting the AMEX Black Card has been fantastic

Post 1: I agree AMEX Black is garbage and I had to write a post evaluating it even though I don't have one because TPG got one so everyone must know my thoughts

Post 2 (today): Well maybe there is value for a few people but I still conclude it's a terrible card (translation: I don't have an affiliate link for it so not going to push it)

I'm not sure why VFTW felt the need to provide his own commentary on TPG getting the AMEX Black Card though...

josephstern Apr 22, 2016 9:16 am


Originally Posted by Duke787 (Post 26520700)
His response to TPG getting the AMEX Black Card has been fantastic

Post 1: I agree AMEX Black is garbage and I had to write a post evaluating it even though I don't have one because TPG got one so everyone must know my thoughts

Post 2 (today): Well maybe there is value for a few people but I still conclude it's a terrible card (translation: I don't have an affiliate link for it so not going to push it)

I'm not sure why VFTW felt the need to provide his own commentary on TPG getting the AMEX Black Card though...

He feels the need to comment on literally everything in this space. Have you ever seen any topic go by without his commentary? He's got the Trump-plane thing, the guy who gave up his seat, Hillary's boba - minutia.

It's tough being a thought leader.

josephstern Apr 22, 2016 10:00 am

He wrote the entire blog post "This Hyatt Wants to Help You Have Sex" basically just because this Hyatt used the word "trysts" in their promo.

If that isn't just garbage content just for the sake of content, I don't know what is. It's one level above the bots that add spam comments.

JetAway Apr 22, 2016 10:22 am


Originally Posted by josephstern (Post 26521161)
He wrote the entire blog post "This Hyatt Wants to Help You Have Sex" basically just because this Hyatt used the word "trysts" in their promo.

If that isn't just garbage content just for the sake of content, I don't know what is. It's one level above the bots that add spam comments.

He still has occasional gems and scoops but more and more it's click bait like the above. He doesn't seem to be minding the (blog) store much anymore. I guess his other enterprises are taking most of his time now.

nineworldseries Apr 22, 2016 12:15 pm


Originally Posted by josephstern (Post 26521161)
He wrote the entire blog post "This Hyatt Wants to Help You Have Sex" basically just because this Hyatt used the word "trysts" in their promo.

If that isn't just garbage content just for the sake of content, I don't know what is. It's one level above the bots that add spam comments.

Wow, +1.

nineworldseries Apr 22, 2016 2:14 pm

Let's examine this latest "completely random and throwaway article that probably doesn't even belong in one of those clickbait spam lists"

http://viewfromthewing.boardingarea....omment-page-1/


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.