Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Eva Air | Infinity MileageLands
Reload this Page >

EVA Pilot COVID Infections - How did this happen?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EVA Pilot COVID Infections - How did this happen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2020, 6:00 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CAN, LAX, TPE
Programs: AA, AS, CI, DL, UA
Posts: 2,898
Originally Posted by garykung
Actually, such law does exist - Immigration Act, Article 6.
Being a New Zealand pilot I don't think he is Taiwanese? That law is applicable to Nationals of Taiwan.

Originally Posted by username
I did a little googling and it seems there was the Korean couple who got fined for violating quarantine rules. Then when they tried to leave, they were not allowed to until the family in Korea paid up.
I don't think this was challenged at court. If it's challenged I don't think there is any ground of not letting the couple leave. It was an easy way out just to pay the fine than going through the logistics.
coolfish1103 is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2020, 6:25 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by coolfish1103
Being a New Zealand pilot I don't think he is Taiwanese? That law is applicable to Nationals of Taiwan.
​​​​They can apply Article 21 for foreigners at the request of judicial, tax or other relevant authorities.
patrickw is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2020, 6:26 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 602
Originally Posted by coolfish1103
I don't think this was challenged at court. If it's challenged I don't think there is any ground of not letting the couple leave. It was an easy way out just to pay the fine than going through the logistics.
I recall Taiwan used to prevent their own citizens from leaving because of unpaid taxes.

Separately, there was a case when a foreign national overstayed, refused to pay the fine upon departure, and was thrown in jail. Not sure what the final outcome of that incident was.
ProleOnParole is online now  
Old Dec 28, 2020, 11:39 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
Originally Posted by coolfish1103
Being a New Zealand pilot I don't think he is Taiwanese? That law is applicable to Nationals of Taiwan.
I may have cited the wrong law. But we don't know if the person also holds a Taiwanese Passport or not (Taiwan allows dual-citizenship). My point is simply to say the law exists.
garykung is offline  
Old Dec 28, 2020, 11:34 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,969
Politically, they will have find ways to hold the guy accountable. The Taiwanese are so proud of the "No Local Transmission" record and so angry at this guy for breaking this streak.

Yes, it is arguable whether this "No Local Transmission" is really no local transmission since multiple Taiwanese have tested positive upon entry to other countries. However, there has not been any outbreak - otherwise it would have been all over the news.

Anyway, so, there is no way the government is just going to let him leave without paying the fine.
username is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020, 8:59 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 352
As pointed out upthread, Article 21 of the Immigration Act pretty clearly covers this situation for aliens:

Article 21
National Immigration Agency shall ban an alien from exiting the State if he or she meets one of the following circumstances:
1. Has been banned from exiting the State at the request of a judicial authority.
2. Has been banned from exiting the State at the request of a tax authority.
National Immigration Agency shall ban an alien who is under investigation for other cases in accordance with laws from exiting the State after the concerned authorities have requested the imposition of such a ban.
National Immigration Agency shall notify the concerned alien in writing with reasons for the banned exit.
east_west is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020, 9:20 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: skudai, Johor
Posts: 417
Originally Posted by username
Politically, they will have find ways to hold the guy accountable. The Taiwanese are so proud of the "No Local Transmission" record and so angry at this guy for breaking this streak.

Yes, it is arguable whether this "No Local Transmission" is really no local transmission since multiple Taiwanese have tested positive upon entry to other countries. However, there has not been any outbreak - otherwise it would have been all over the news.

Anyway, so, there is no way the government is just going to let him leave without paying the fine.
Another EVA pilot fired, see EVA Air pilot fired for illicit affairs during quarantine | Taiwan News | 2020/12/29

EVA had also some air hostess fired for breaking the COVID rules and showing off on LINE or other social media.
inlandrev is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2020, 7:07 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,920
This incident does not speak well of the company culture. I expected that the importance of safety would be paramount by now.

Q1. It is unlikely the captain started to cough spontaneously on the flight deck. It is plausible that he was coughing while in the ground office briefing etc. Didn't anyone see him / hear him? How about at the gate?
Q2: Why did the other pilots not protest and refuse to fly with the NZ Captain? There would have been time in the cockpit prior to departure to object.
Q3: Does EVA support employees who would raise a health & safety objection? Surely, there would have been an opportunity to leave the cabin and call the flight center? What do they do if they smell alcohol on a colleague's breath, or notice another issue?
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2020, 11:33 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
This incident does not speak well of the company culture. I expected that the importance of safety would be paramount by now.

Q1. It is unlikely the captain started to cough spontaneously on the flight deck. It is plausible that he was coughing while in the ground office briefing etc. Didn't anyone see him / hear him? How about at the gate?
Q2: Why did the other pilots not protest and refuse to fly with the NZ Captain? There would have been time in the cockpit prior to departure to object.
Q3: Does EVA support employees who would raise a health & safety objection? Surely, there would have been an opportunity to leave the cabin and call the flight center? What do they do if they smell alcohol on a colleague's breath, or notice another issue?
1. He could've just been coughing like he was choking for a bit and then stopped. I'm not thinking he was coughing continuously like a smoker.
2. The story of the woman FO complaining about how he was coughing is not confirmed. It's something online and something the OP mentioned he "read" somewhere. The only confirmed thing is that he did not wear a mask according to the second FO in the cockpit. The Japanese FO never mentioned coughing in the testimony.
3. BR policy is any crew member, regardless of rank, can object to the flight at any time, and the SOC/airport team will get involved to understand the issues/remedy them. All you need to do is inform the ground staff or ACARS the SOC.

I like how all these people are complaining about CRM on the news and what not. How exactly is this a Crew Resource Management issue? Communication is a facet of CRM, but this event was during the cruise phase, when the cockpit isn't sterile nor is it a critical phase of flight. Such issues can easily be discussed and addressed during this time. If somehow the FO let this issue affect her ability to operate the remainder of the flight, she, along with whoever else had an issue, need to be let go as well.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2020, 12:08 am
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
IIRC there have been incidents where EVA arguably did not support FAs. For instance, there was the guy going to BKK who insisted on help using the toilet. I also vaguely recall some FA in uniform posting sexy pictures (in the cockpit I believe) on social media and being fired. There might have been some dispute over wages or working conditions where FAs threatened to call in sick or walk off the job.

Are EVA pilots supposed to wear masks while on duty in the cockpit (in flight and with the door closed)? AFAIK not on USA carriers as the mask interferes with communications, including with ATC. It would also be in the way if pilots needed to suddenly put on their oxygen masks.

Also, would there have been a temperature check at the airport? Are crew required to confirm that they're symptom free when they report for duty?
ProleOnParole likes this.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2020, 4:24 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
IIRC there have been incidents where EVA arguably did not support FAs. For instance, there was the guy going to BKK who insisted on help using the toilet. I also vaguely recall some FA in uniform posting sexy pictures (in the cockpit I believe) on social media and being fired. There might have been some dispute over wages or working conditions where FAs threatened to call in sick or walk off the job.

Are EVA pilots supposed to wear masks while on duty in the cockpit (in flight and with the door closed)? AFAIK not on USA carriers as the mask interferes with communications, including with ATC. It would also be in the way if pilots needed to suddenly put on their oxygen masks.

Also, would there have been a temperature check at the airport? Are crew required to confirm that they're symptom free when they report for duty?
BR has in past cases not defended workers for sake of public image or customer service; in hindsight, that probably wasn't a good idea. But in the last decade, they have always supported their employees. The whole wiping incident is totally overblown; the FA that had the press conference (FA Guo) did not even wipe the gentleman's butt, the CP did. It's my understanding the CP still works at BR. The FA in the cockpit with the sexy photos should have been fired, no phone usage allowed on the flight deck+her genitals were hanging out. Which airline would be ok with that?

There is a temperature check and a health/wellness screening prior to duty that crew must submit to.

I have zero idea why the CAA of Taiwan has allowed face masks to be worn in the cockpit during flight but yes, crews are required to wear them per the CECC airline policy. They do interfere with the quick-don masks, hence the reason the FAA does not allow a mask on for flight crew. The mask is no different than a pilot having a beard, a big no-no. It's also the same reason they tell you to remove your face covering before putting on your oxygen mask in the event of a cabin depressurization for passengers (although those aren't quick don).
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2020, 1:33 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LAS ORD
Programs: AA Pro (mostly B6) OZ♦ (flying BR/UA), BA Silver Hyatt LT, Wynn Black, Cosmo Plat, Mlife Noir
Posts: 5,992
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
This incident does not speak well of the company culture. I expected that the importance of safety would be paramount by now... What do they do if they smell alcohol on a colleague's breath, or notice another issue?
Let's not involve ourselves in the ridiculousness of raising a flight crew member "coughing without a mask" to the level of 'having consumed alcohol preflight', please.
gengar is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 3:39 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: skudai, Johor
Posts: 417
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
1. He could've just been coughing like he was choking for a bit and then stopped. I'm not thinking he was coughing continuously like a smoker.
2. The story of the woman FO complaining about how he was coughing is not confirmed. It's something online and something the OP mentioned he "read" somewhere. The only confirmed thing is that he did not wear a mask according to the second FO in the cockpit. The Japanese FO never mentioned coughing in the testimony.
3. BR policy is any crew member, regardless of rank, can object to the flight at any time, and the SOC/airport team will get involved to understand the issues/remedy them. All you need to do is inform the ground staff or ACARS the SOC.

I like how all these people are complaining about CRM on the news and what not. How exactly is this a Crew Resource Management issue? Communication is a facet of CRM, but this event was during the cruise phase, when the cockpit isn't sterile nor is it a critical phase of flight. Such issues can easily be discussed and addressed during this time. If somehow the FO let this issue affect her ability to operate the remainder of the flight, she, along with whoever else had an issue, need to be let go as well.
To me it seems he was fired for things he did away from the airplane/airport which broke local COVID rules. This was the case with most recent pilot a few days ago and the Flight Hostess that was fired recently too, who all broke COVID rules outside the airport/airplane which as public news here in Taiwan which is a factor too.
inlandrev is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 9:27 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,920
Originally Posted by gengar
Let's not involve ourselves in the ridiculousness of raising a flight crew member "coughing without a mask" to the level of 'having consumed alcohol preflight', please.
The point was in respect to working "culture". I remind you of the Asiana flight which highlighted the influence of hierarchy and the reluctance to question a senior ranked person.
It is therefore not "ridiculous" to inquire if the same issue was not involved here. If you go back to Q3;
Does EVA support employees who would raise a health & safety objection? Surely, there would have been an opportunity to leave the cabin and call the flight center? What do they do if they smell alcohol on a colleague's breath, or notice another issue?
The question was in respect to the health and safety culture. Too often we have heard of companies who have tried to quiet employee safety concerns and it has deadly consequences. This question has been answered in thread

The takeaway of the incident is that the the NZ pilot seems to have been a handful. Such people do not just develop over night and it begs the question as to what other risky actions had he been engaged in and if he was being properly supervised. Vociferous non compliance as was reported indicates a behavior pattern. If the pilot is a personality who is not compliant with safety procedures that he disagrees with, it is reasonable to be concerned with his overall performance.
Transpacificflyer is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2021, 3:21 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by Transpacificflyer
The point was in respect to working "culture". I remind you of the Asiana flight which highlighted the influence of hierarchy and the reluctance to question a senior ranked person.
It is therefore not "ridiculous" to inquire if the same issue was not involved here. If you go back to Q3;
Does EVA support employees who would raise a health & safety objection? Surely, there would have been an opportunity to leave the cabin and call the flight center? What do they do if they smell alcohol on a colleague's breath, or notice another issue?
The question was in respect to the health and safety culture. Too often we have heard of companies who have tried to quiet employee safety concerns and it has deadly consequences. This question has been answered in thread

The takeaway of the incident is that the the NZ pilot seems to have been a handful. Such people do not just develop over night and it begs the question as to what other risky actions had he been engaged in and if he was being properly supervised. Vociferous non compliance as was reported indicates a behavior pattern. If the pilot is a personality who is not compliant with safety procedures that he disagrees with, it is reasonable to be concerned with his overall performance.
BR operates a very "western" flight operations system. They hired someone from the USA to operate as their VP of Flight Operations/Administration when they initially started (and generally lean foreign in this position), and have stuck with US certifications for both A&P and flight crew, in part due to the stigma from CI and it's awful safety record.
hayzel7773 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.