Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BANNED - Note 7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 6:52 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Programs: Emirates Platinum
Posts: 46
BANNED - Note 7

Last updated: 15 October 2016, 15:45 Dubai (GMT+4)

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Phone Advisory
In light of advisories from various aviation regulatory bodies and concerns raised by Samsung about its Galaxy Note 7 smartphones, passengers are advised that these devices are prohibited on all Emirates flights. Passengers are requested not to bring them on board Emirates' flights in person, as well as in carry-on or checked-in baggage.



I'm currently on business in Africa with a return flight home through Dubai next week. I've already been in contact with Dubai Duty Free to return the Note 7 I bought from them. Anyone else just get screwed with this ban?
kitesurfer is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 7:20 am
  #2  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by kitesurfer
Last updated: 15 October 2016, 15:45 Dubai (GMT+4)

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Phone Advisory
In light of advisories from various aviation regulatory bodies and concerns raised by Samsung about its Galaxy Note 7 smartphones, passengers are advised that these devices are prohibited on all Emirates flights. Passengers are requested not to bring them on board Emirates' flights in person, as well as in carry-on or checked-in baggage.



I'm currently on business in Africa with a return flight home through Dubai next week. I've already been in contact with Dubai Duty Free to return the Note 7 I bought from them. Anyone else just get screwed with this ban?
How will they know that you have it on you. Just keep it switched off in your carry-on luggage.
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 10:02 am
  #3  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,482
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
How will they know that you have it on you. Just keep it switched off in your carry-on luggage.
Clearly when it catches fire

That said, as it's now law from the FAA you can't bring one on board, I wouldn't want to take the risk of having it confiscated or even put on the no-fly list if I was found to have one at the airport going through security in the US.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...irline-flights
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 10:16 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
FAA regulations wouldn't apply for a flight from somewhere in Africa to DXB unless there's a very strange routing using either a USA carrier or a connection through the USA.

I suspect it would also be difficult to use FedEx or a similar service to return the phone.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 10:32 am
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,482
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
FAA regulations wouldn't apply for a flight from somewhere in Africa to DXB unless there's a very strange routing using either a USA carrier or a connection through the USA.

I suspect it would also be difficult to use FedEx or a similar service to return the phone.
Indeed - I did specify the US there

EK has its own regulations though and they seem to be following the same advice, and I don't think anyone on FT should advise people to endanger aircraft by carrying on board what a respected and credible regulator has classed as a "forbidden hazardous material"!
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 10:35 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Indeed - I did specify the US there

EK has its own regulations though and they seem to be following the same advice, and I don't think anyone on FT should advise people to endanger aircraft by carrying on board what a respected and credible regulator has classed as a "forbidden hazardous material"!
HUH? Where in my post am I advising someone to take a Galaxy 7 device on board an airline when this is forbidden? Please apologize.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 12:31 pm
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,482
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
HUH? Where in my post am I advising someone to take a Galaxy 7 device on board an airline when this is forbidden? Please apologize.
My apologies - I meant in general, not as a reply to you re: bringing banned materials on board.

To be clear, I don't think it is wise for anyone to advise the OP to bring the device on board, no matter how lax/strict any security procedures are.
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 12:38 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
My apologies - I meant in general, not as a reply to you re: bringing banned materials on board.

To be clear, I don't think it is wise for anyone to advise the OP to bring the device on board, no matter how lax/strict any security procedures are.
This would have been true even before the ban. If your device catches fire, chances are good that you'll be the first passenger to die as well as the passenger most likely to either die or sustain horrific disfiguring injuries.

AFAIK the no fly list is for major terrorists, not people who disobey FAA directives.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 5:56 pm
  #9  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,482
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
AFAIK the no fly list is for major terrorists, not people who disobey FAA directives.
Without straying into OMNI, I thought that inclusion onto the list was a relatively controversial topic - at least, according to Google
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2016 | 11:21 pm
  #10  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
My apologies - I meant in general, not as a reply to you re: bringing banned materials on board.

To be clear, I don't think it is wise for anyone to advise the OP to bring the device on board, no matter how lax/strict any security procedures are.
With all due respect, we're not talking about a firework or incendiary device. The Note 7, switched off, poses no risk to the best of my knowledge. I seriously don't see there being any major consequences to carrying the device in a 7hr flight to DXB to return it there.

Given this new rule however perhaps DDF would be open to refunding without returning the device or you can return it elsewhere to a Samsung service centre?
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 1:42 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,051
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
The Note 7, switched off, poses no risk to the best of my knowledge.
In at least one of the incidents the owner claimed it was switched off.
ft101 is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 1:43 am
  #12  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by ft101
In at least one of the incidents the owner claimed it was switched off.
"Claimed". And was it charging? I work in IT, never believe the user.
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 1:56 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,051
Yes, just claimed, and he could easily be saying that to protect himself. Powered off and not charging according to the report.

It is believable if the fault is due to weaknesses in the construction of the battery, ie insulator breakdown which does not require current flow to take place, but when it happens causes excess current flow and heat/fire.
ft101 is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 2:21 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Programs: Emirates Skywards Silver
Posts: 384
just wondering if a similar ban applies to the carrying of e-cigs. There have been cases of these catching light or even worse exploding
steveben53 is offline  
Old Oct 16, 2016 | 2:37 am
  #15  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,664
In Australia, phones are now to be screened separately through security, like a laptop, in its own tray. I have no idea how the staff will identify between the different Samsung models...
m0hamed is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.