Community
Wiki Posts
Search
View Poll Results: Is Emirates A Financial Scam?
Yes
27
15.52%
No
106
60.92%
Dont care
35
20.11%
Undecided
6
3.45%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

Is Emirates a financial scam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2014, 4:25 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by eternaltransit

And as for your comment about staff costs being immaterial - I would hardly call the 2nd biggest cost that all airlines, not just EK have being staff costs immaterial. This includes retiree benefits: the fact that retiree obligations at US legacy carriers were a major factor in their bankruptcy (before aCEnd after) I think. is testament to that. The basic fact of airline economics in the past 50 years has shown that labor conditions and therefore costs has been one of the major impediments to profit margin: the success of LCC shows this.
Many years ago (before political correctness), I do remember a US CEO complaining in an inflight mag about Asian carriers like SQ sacking their pretty FAs at around 30. Now is the ME carriers turn...
avsecman is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 4:28 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,454
Originally Posted by avsecman
Many years ago (before political correctness), I do remember a US CEO complaining in an inflight mag about Asian carriers like SQ sacking their pretty FAs at around 30. Now is the ME carriers turn...
Ah, now they don't do the sacking at 30, what SQ do is when you join, you are given one uniform. That doesn't change in size. Ever....

This isn't a joke btw (at least that was my understanding two years ago).

For comparison, the standard at EK is 3 year rolling contracts (as work permits expire every 3 years in the UAE). However, EK has a high enough turnover of cabin crew for them not to impolitely terminate someone at mid 30s for being too old - or at least, it doesn't seem to be the norm - most younger staff at ME airlines I think leave in their 30s for another career/actual career.
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 5:05 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Ah, now they don't do the sacking at 30, what SQ do is when you join, you are given one uniform. That doesn't change in size. Ever....
My GF is over 40 but they still weigh her to make sure she fits her uniform when required. Keeps her on her toes and slim for me! She is not EK or QR.
avsecman is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 5:11 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Skywards Blue :-(, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold, GHA Platinum
Posts: 2,531
Originally Posted by iahphx
Thanks for the comments. But I remain 100% convinced that Emirates could not make money flying these flights from the USA. Dubai is simply an illogical connecting points for most destinations from the USA. As I said, the only major connecting market is India. Otherwise, the geography is simply wrong.

The population of Dubai is only 2 million -- about the same as Budapest which, to my knowledge, has zero nonstop flights to the USA from ANY city. On "real economics" -- the economics that would apply to a USA airline -- MAYBE this flight would work from NYC. That's about it.

Emirates does not partner with any of the 3 world alliances. That would cause most American businessmen to fly other airlines. There would also be a natural booking away from Middle East airlines: indeed, while I would appreciate the service on Emirates, I honestly wouldn't be looking for a reason to fly them to connect to someplace else. I think at least 95% of Americans would feel the same (and probably the majority of high elite status USA frequent flyers).

The vast majority of the cost of this route would be aircraft and fuel. I don't care what they pay their staff -- it would be largely immaterial.

There is obviously squirrelly mathematics going on with these Middle East airlines. If the rest of the world operated like this, there would be several dozen of A380 flights from the USA to Europe every day. This level of service doesn't exist because no one is picking up the tab for it.
Comparing Dubai with Budapest is like comparing apples with oranges. Out of the over 2 million people living in Dubai , close to 90% AFAIK are expats. Obviously not everyone is in a cushy job , but even the workers in manual labour travel every year or so.

Moreover quite a few residents of the other GCC countries in the region prefer to connect via DXB since they prefer emirates over their flag carriers.
ukdoctor is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 5:15 pm
  #20  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Here
Programs: HHonors Diamond, AA EXP
Posts: 1,496
Adding to an already excellent analysis by CaptainEKAirbus and eternaltransit:
Just so you know that EK is considered the official airlines of...India. The vast amount of westward traffic from the subcontinent, alone is enough for them to keep filling these A380s. It was a huge opportunity lost for several Asian carriers , including SQ/MH/TG.

Last edited by ashkale; Nov 10, 2014 at 5:21 pm
ashkale is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 5:36 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by ukdoctor
but even the workers in manual labour travel every year or so.
Some but not all. Some will do several years' before a ticket home, particlarly Bangladeshis and others from umremarkable parts of the world.... Many will earn life changing money... some won't, for some will be a road to nowhere...
avsecman is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 6:44 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,427
Originally Posted by Emirates202
This whole thread is based on your opinion, which you are trying to make sound like facts.
Yes, it's my opinion, but I've worked as an analyst in this industry for decades, and there's nothing like this in the world.

All this blather about "connections" in Dubai is nonsense. Who's making these connections? The number of USA businessmen making connections in Dubai on any given day has got to be tiny. Where are they going to? Nobody in the airline industry has EVER had success running a hub without strong O/D traffic. It's impossible, since you always make most of your money on high value nonstop business travel. This is Airline Economics 101. There is no way that hordes of USA businessmen are going to get off these flights and connect to other destinations. That's beyond fantastical.

I'm sure Emirates attracts plenty of friends and family tourists visiting their home countries, but these tourists traveling on low fares don't pay the bills. And there are only so many sheiks.

I feel bad for an airline like Qantas which obviously suffers geographically from what would otherwise be a good business of shuttling people between Europe and Australia. There is obviously not a real geographical problem for USA airlines as the only real casualty is fewer nonstop flights to India.

Which of course leads to the next obvious question: why are there tons more nonstop flights to the Middle East from the USA than India? It's obviously not because Middle Eastern airlines are better at running their businesses than US airlines, and people prefer to stop. It's because there's something VERY messed-up with the economics of these Middle Eastern airlines. They are wholly different than the economics of any other airlines in the world.
iahphx is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 7:01 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Programs: EK Plat, UA GS, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Amex Centurion
Posts: 514
Originally Posted by iahphx
I'm sure Emirates attracts plenty of friends and family tourists visiting their home countries, but these tourists traveling on low fares don't pay the bills. And there are only so many sheiks.
I already said this but I will say it again. First and business class usually sell out before economy on flights JFK, and I'm sure to other US destinations as well. I can assure you that those of us paying $16K+ for a ticket are not all "friends and family tourists."
If there is no nonstop flights to places like BKK from NY, how do you expect us to get there? Thats where EK plays a huge role. Connecting places where there aren't nonstop flights to.
Emirates202 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 7:26 pm
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Auckland NZ
Programs: SQ TPPS, EK Gold, IHG RA, Marriott Gold Hyatt Diamond, HHonors Gold, UA Premier Gold, TG Silver
Posts: 1,092
Originally Posted by iahphx
Yes, it's my opinion, but I've worked as an analyst in this industry for decades, and there's nothing like this in the world.

All this blather about "connections" in Dubai is nonsense. Who's making these connections? The number of USA businessmen making connections in Dubai on any given day has got to be tiny. Where are they going to? Nobody in the airline industry has EVER had success running a hub without strong O/D traffic. It's impossible, since you always make most of your money on high value nonstop business travel. This is Airline Economics 101. There is no way that hordes of USA businessmen are going to get off these flights and connect to other destinations. That's beyond fantastical.

I'm sure Emirates attracts plenty of friends and family tourists visiting their home countries, but these tourists traveling on low fares don't pay the bills. And there are only so many sheiks.

I feel bad for an airline like Qantas which obviously suffers geographically from what would otherwise be a good business of shuttling people between Europe and Australia. There is obviously not a real geographical problem for USA airlines as the only real casualty is fewer nonstop flights to India.

Which of course leads to the next obvious question: why are there tons more nonstop flights to the Middle East from the USA than India? It's obviously not because Middle Eastern airlines are better at running their businesses than US airlines, and people prefer to stop. It's because there's something VERY messed-up with the economics of these Middle Eastern airlines. They are wholly different than the economics of any other airlines in the world.
You imply that, because you are not capable of making sense of it, it must be a scam. Interesting approach...
Wan1dap is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:12 pm
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,624
Originally Posted by Wan1dap
You imply that, because you are not capable of making sense of it, it must be a scam. Interesting approach...
Well....

It isn't doing what US carriers do
Obviously everything that the US does must be the best and only right way
therefore EK must be running a scam

Simples
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:24 pm
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,427
Originally Posted by Wan1dap
You imply that, because you are not capable of making sense of it, it must be a scam. Interesting approach...
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Well....

It isn't doing what US carriers do
Obviously everything that the US does must be the best and only right way
therefore EK must be running a scam

Simples
I am certainly not the only one who thinks this is fishy. I mean, guys, it's OBVIOUSLY fishy. There are only a total of 7.5 million people in these 3 countries and they're running some of the biggest global airlines in the world. There are no other airlines that operate like this is the world -- even in countries with large populations and sophisticated economies. Why would you think it's not fishy? Are these Middle Eastern countries known for their financial prowess? No -- they're known for ridiculous oil wealth and ridiculously wealthy non-democratic rulers. Which is obviously what this is about. Just be glad that whatever business you're in you don't have to compete with "companies" such as these.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB100...41732219208604
iahphx is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:40 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 948
I have to agree with others, as a so called analyst of airlines your opinion of Emirates and ME3 comes across as incredibly narrow minded and because it does not make sense to you that they are successful where others fail that something must be "fishy".

My question is do you have any hard evidence or factual information to back up your opinion?
Firemansam is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:47 pm
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Here
Programs: HHonors Diamond, AA EXP
Posts: 1,496
Originally Posted by iahphx
I am certainly not the only one who thinks this is fishy. I mean, guys, it's OBVIOUSLY fishy. There are only a total of 7.5 million people in these 3 countries and they're running some of the biggest global airlines in the world. There are no other airlines that operate like this is the world -- even in countries with large populations and sophisticated economies. Why would you think it's not fishy? Are these Middle Eastern countries known for their financial prowess? No -- they're known for ridiculous oil wealth and ridiculously wealthy non-democratic rulers. Which is obviously what this is about. Just be glad that whatever business you're in you don't have to compete with "companies" such as these.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB100...41732219208604
And now you are trolling..werent you the famous financial analyst at Red Neck inc?
ashkale is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:48 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,427
Originally Posted by Firemansam
My question is do you have any hard evidence or factual information to back up your opinion?
The same evidence as Delta airlines CEO Richard Anderson: the numbers simply don't add up in the real world. It's not possible for these airlines to make money flying these routes. I challenge you to find me one major USA airline analyst who says it is possible. Mind you, almost all of the "high service" airlines in the world struggle to make money. "Real" airlines like Singapore are barely break even. And they have plausible business plans. There is NOTHING plausible about flying A380s to America from the Middle East. Nothing.
iahphx is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2014, 8:52 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Auckland NZ
Programs: SQ TPPS, EK Gold, IHG RA, Marriott Gold Hyatt Diamond, HHonors Gold, UA Premier Gold, TG Silver
Posts: 1,092
Originally Posted by iahphx
I am certainly not the only one who thinks this is fishy. I mean, guys, it's OBVIOUSLY fishy. There are only a total of 7.5 million people in these 3 countries and they're running some of the biggest global airlines in the world. There are no other airlines that operate like this is the world -- even in countries with large populations and sophisticated economies. Why would you think it's not fishy? Are these Middle Eastern countries known for their financial prowess? No -- they're known for ridiculous oil wealth and ridiculously wealthy non-democratic rulers. Which is obviously what this is about. Just be glad that whatever business you're in you don't have to compete with "companies" such as these.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB100...41732219208604
Wow, now we've moved into the realms of sweeping, unfounded generalisations. Based on your population analogy, then SIA and Cathay must be "fishy" because they're based in small countries. Oh, and they're not American either, so that confirms it.
Wan1dap is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.