Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > EL AL | Matmid
Reload this Page >

Hundreds of El Al passengers spent 7 hours on tarmac in U.S.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Hundreds of El Al passengers spent 7 hours on tarmac in U.S.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2009, 6:04 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Israel
Programs: Elal Silver, AirCanada Aeroplan, AA AAdvantage, KLM Flying Blue, Continental OnePass, Delta Skymiles
Posts: 530
Hundreds of El Al passengers spent 7 hours on tarmac in U.S.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1138397.html
hnussbacher is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 6:37 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,804
disgusting

According to this article, does this mean ELAL will now be fined $11,000,000

US limits tarmac wait to 3 hrs

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/bu...=TARMAC&st=cse

"Airlines that let a plane sit on the tarmac for more than two hours without giving passengers food or water, or more than three hours without offering them the option of getting off, will face fines of $27,500 a passenger, the Secretary of Transportation announced on Monday."

Last edited by ELAL; Dec 29, 2009 at 6:48 am
ELAL is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 7:02 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kfar Saba, Israel
Posts: 4,172
The date of the flight (Dec 16) was before the new rule have passed (a week later) ...
apirchik is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 7:22 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,804
Originally Posted by apirchik
The date of the flight (Dec 16) was before the new rule have passed (a week later) ...
I wonder if they can fine foreign airlines too
ELAL is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 7:35 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kfar Saba, Israel
Posts: 4,172
Originally Posted by ELAL
I wonder if they can fine foreign airlines too
As I understand it, a passenger can sue damages from the airline in the USA, just like you can do in Europe with EU regulation 261/2004 - regardless of the base of the airline.
apirchik is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 7:40 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
I dont know why any Israeli should be complaining, all I ever hear is We want to be like America. Welcome Aboard.

Oh you guys only want the good parts, not gonna happen

That said to LY
craz is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 7:41 am
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Wow, that's miserable.

Note to self: Stay away from El Al.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:03 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by ELAL
I wonder if they can fine foreign airlines too
Sure. Foreign airlines operating in the US are subject to US jurisdiction while operating in the US.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:05 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kfar Saba, Israel
Posts: 4,172
I don't believe El Al could have unloaded the passengers.

Per US laws, once you have boarded the plane to an international flight you have departed the USA and the I-94 slips have been taken away from you. Knowing EWR terminal B (like most other terminals in the USA), once you are off the plane in the terminal building, there is no way to prevent a passenger from getting out and staying in the USA without registration. Deplaning would mean going through immigration and that would be a long process.
Also, there is a question of legality of the crew hours once the cabin door opens.

In all, when the question is whether to stay on the plane for 5 hours or stay in the USA for another 24 hours, I guess most would take the 5 hour delay.
apirchik is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:21 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by apirchik
I don't believe El Al could have unloaded the passengers.

Per US laws, once you have boarded the plane to an international flight you have departed the USA and the I-94 slips have been taken away from you. Knowing EWR terminal B (like most other terminals in the USA), once you are off the plane in the terminal building, there is no way to prevent a passenger from getting out and staying in the USA without registration. Deplaning would mean going through immigration and that would be a long process.
Also, there is a question of legality of the crew hours once the cabin door opens.

In all, when the question is whether to stay on the plane for 5 hours or stay in the USA for another 24 hours, I guess most would take the 5 hour delay.
US law doesn't stop other departing airlines in the US from going back to some gate at an airport to offload passengers after the flight has initially left the gate to depart the US. Other practical concerns (including those you mentioned) are what get in the way of going back to the gate -- it's not US law that is the problem.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:22 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London uk
Programs: *A Gold, BA Silver, Avis President, Hertz President circle
Posts: 2,804
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
Note to self: Stay away from El Al.
Well it seems very common at JFK reading this BA thread you hear of BA passengers stuck for 7.5 hours and continental stuck for 9 hours, in this thread you of hear of passengers stuck for 11 hours only 10 days ago!

Note to Self: Stay away from people who post such erotic posts, I assume ELAL will be glad for you to stay away.
ELAL is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:26 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by ELAL
Well it seems very common at JFK reading this BA thread you hear of BA passengers stuck for 7.5 hours and continental stuck for 9 hours, in this thread you of hear of passengers stuck for 11 hours only 10 days ago!

Note to Self: Stay away from people who post such erotic posts, I assume ELAL will be glad for you to stay away.
What's an erotic post?

And are you offended that I still stay away from El Al?
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:29 am
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by magiciansampras
What's an erotic post?
A post that gets someone excited/aroused?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:35 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: A3 *G, BA silver, LH, UA
Posts: 518
Originally Posted by apirchik
I don't believe El Al could have unloaded the passengers.

Per US laws, once you have boarded the plane to an international flight you have departed the USA and the I-94 slips have been taken away from you. Knowing EWR terminal B (like most other terminals in the USA), once you are off the plane in the terminal building, there is no way to prevent a passenger from getting out and staying in the USA without registration. Deplaning would mean going through immigration and that would be a long process.
Also, there is a question of legality of the crew hours once the cabin door opens.

In all, when the question is whether to stay on the plane for 5 hours or stay in the USA for another 24 hours, I guess most would take the 5 hour delay.
As someone who just recently handed in his I-94 in, boarded a UA plane, had to deplane (due to fuel pump issues) in SEA, and did not go through immigration again, I wonder whether this is a real issue. Of course, I wanted to get out of SEA, so I waited 21 hours inside the US (SeaTac hotels suck), and then boarded a different plane.

Now maybe one Israeli in a crowd (I thought about staying in the US, as I officially left but had to go to Japan) is not that harmful, but a plane full of Israelis is a bit too much. But of course, if they allowed UA to do so, then they should have allowed LY to do so, otherwise, they are racists, and use profiling...
mkilmo is offline  
Old Dec 29, 2009, 8:36 am
  #15  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Originally Posted by GUWonder
A post that gets someone excited/aroused?
The author or the reader?
magiciansampras is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.