Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > DiningBuzz
Reload this Page >

Paying for breakfast

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Paying for breakfast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 12:09 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,595
I'm currently pondering a hotel where breakfast will be $35 each for two of us. $210 over the three days seems astronomical! My mother, who I will be travelling with, is a huge hotel breakfast person - she is tiny, but will eat enough at a hotel breakfast to put two linebackers to shame! It keeps her going until evening, so I guess it is worth it for her. This particular one also has cava at breakfast, which is a plus for me, as the days will include a lot of museums I suspect!
emma69 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 5:04 pm
  #32  
Moderator Communications Coordinator, Signatures
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: deep within the Eskimo lair
Programs: TubWorld, Bar Alliance, Borratxo Legendarium
Posts: 16,970
Originally Posted by darthbimmer
By contrast, the $100 dinner people are thinking of is most likely fine steak and/or fish, gourmet prepared vegetables, and wine, beer, or cocktails. Serve it at 9am and it's still worth $100. It's not the time of day or name of the meal that counts, it's the type and quality of the food.

This is true to an extent... but I'm also far less likely to be interested in that kind of meal at 9 a.m.

My most expensive meal ever was lunch at a 3* Michelin restaurant ... but they serve pretty much that exact same meal during evening hours for 2 1/2 times the cost. So you can't completely discount that "time of day" contributes to perceived value.
missydarlin is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 5:34 pm
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 14,059
Originally Posted by darthbimmer
Serve it at 9am and it's still worth $100. It's not the time of day or name of the meal that counts, it's the type and quality of the food.
So, where are all the $100 dinner-for-breakfast joints we should be seeing, based on that logic?
nerd is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 5:40 pm
  #34  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aussie in ORD
Programs: Marriott --something--, Ua plat, GE.. Sucker for punishment
Posts: 4,346
$25 for breakfast? I am much more budget than $100 for dinner and that would be a very expensive bfast for me.... But then I like a bakery breakfast!
cyclogenesis is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 5:50 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NRT
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 10,045
Originally Posted by nerd
For some people, breakfast is never worth more than 10 bucks, but a quality $100 dinner can be.

Why do you think that's impossible?
Because value is absolute. That's why an apartment in downtown Manhattan costs the same as an apartment in the middle of Alaska.
jib71 is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 5:15 am
  #36  
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Programs: BAC Silver, IHG Diamond, Finnair Silver, LH Senator
Posts: 9,381
I would never knowingly pay $25 for breakfast. If it's not included in my room rate, then I don't bother. Even then, if they're charging say $20 extra over a room only rate, I won't pay it. Far easier to walk a block or so to a 7-11 or similar and buy a smoothie etc for a few $ (unless of course I'm i the middle of nowhere and there's no options and I'm so hungry it leaves me no real choice)
Last time I was in NYC, I went to a deli for breakfast and got a cream cheese bagel and smoothie for around $4. Very filling.

As for paying $100 for dinner, frown on that even more. I can't justify paying something like $20-30 for a plate with a tiny piece of meat, two bits of asparagus and a dribbling of some sauce in a fancy restaurant which they call a main course. Would much rather save $90 and hit somewhere like McDonalds as it at least fills you up.
xenole is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 11:50 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,595
Originally Posted by nerd
So, where are all the $100 dinner-for-breakfast joints we should be seeing, based on that logic?
Well, you see a fair few brunch places that serve your seafood ap, your roast meat main and your puds, for a good deal less than those same ingredients would cost after 7pm.
emma69 is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011 | 3:03 pm
  #38  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 334
Originally Posted by meester69
Am I the only one who really resents it and refuses to see the value?

I will happily pay $100/head for dinner, but try to charge me $25 for breakfast and I will run screaming out the door (to the nearest bakery).

I guess it's all the hotels offering 'free' breakfast, but basically if a hotel's breakfast is more than a few dollars I will try to avoid it (if my wife will let me).
What does it matter to you if you are the only one? I'm not sure I see a point to the thread.
new2japan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.