DL website today and nipple exposed?
#46
Original Member, Moderator: Hotel Deals and MilesBuzz
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,257
This thread has over 1,000 views in less than 12 hours.
#48
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: AA Plat, Delta Plat, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Diamon
Posts: 1,262
see photo enlarged here: http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/4...ltazoomwe9.jpg
#49
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: AA Plat, Delta Plat, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Diamon
Posts: 1,262
You folks are a very horny suggestive bunch. There's no nipple in that picture. It does look like the bikini top the woman is wearing is pushing up, but that's about it.
No matter how you frame it or enlarge it, there's clearly no nipple there.
No matter how you frame it or enlarge it, there's clearly no nipple there.
#50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: UA 1K, LA, WN, SPG Plat, MR Gold
Posts: 730
Maybe they'll take it down if we all email how obscene it is and that we demand compensation!
#51
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,555
I bet the pic is up longer than this thread remains in the DL Forum.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP / LT PLT / 3MM, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 35,389
That is not a nipple. It's a small tumor. Or a gull dropping.
#55
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CVG
Programs: DL 3MM, US 972k (AA 0.0k), Marriott Lifetime Gold, Hertz G, Nurburgring in 8:29
Posts: 2,183
Sorry, I'm typing this between BCS Championship commercials... GO BUCKS!
(Without the original file I can't say with 100% certainty but based on what I have to work with) if I had to give expert testimony; I would go on record as saying it is not a nip.
HOWEVER, I believe there was one in the original file. It can always be coincidental, but there are some signs of professional retouching... Or major league luck of the Irish, such as a dust spot on the sensor directly on top of the nip which would roughly be a 683,333:1 shot. Dust spots usually create a shadow though rather than a blurry patch that matches the masked background color.
Like I said in the last post, I think the photographer didn't see it in the viewfinder but like the photo so much during post processing that they digitally manipulated the tic-tac out.
(Without the original file I can't say with 100% certainty but based on what I have to work with) if I had to give expert testimony; I would go on record as saying it is not a nip.
HOWEVER, I believe there was one in the original file. It can always be coincidental, but there are some signs of professional retouching... Or major league luck of the Irish, such as a dust spot on the sensor directly on top of the nip which would roughly be a 683,333:1 shot. Dust spots usually create a shadow though rather than a blurry patch that matches the masked background color.
Like I said in the last post, I think the photographer didn't see it in the viewfinder but like the photo so much during post processing that they digitally manipulated the tic-tac out.
#56
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: AA Plat, Delta Plat, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Diamon
Posts: 1,262
#58
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta PlM, 1M
Posts: 6,363
Sorry, I'm typing this between BCS Championship commercials... GO BUCKS!
(Without the original file I can't say with 100% certainty but based on what I have to work with) if I had to give expert testimony; I would go on record as saying it is not a nip.
HOWEVER, I believe there was one in the original file. It can always be coincidental, but there are some signs of professional retouching... Or major league luck of the Irish, such as a dust spot on the sensor directly on top of the nip which would roughly be a 683,333:1 shot. Dust spots usually create a shadow though rather than a blurry patch that matches the masked background color.
Like I said in the last post, I think the photographer didn't see it in the viewfinder but like the photo so much during post processing that they digitally manipulated the tic-tac out.
(Without the original file I can't say with 100% certainty but based on what I have to work with) if I had to give expert testimony; I would go on record as saying it is not a nip.
HOWEVER, I believe there was one in the original file. It can always be coincidental, but there are some signs of professional retouching... Or major league luck of the Irish, such as a dust spot on the sensor directly on top of the nip which would roughly be a 683,333:1 shot. Dust spots usually create a shadow though rather than a blurry patch that matches the masked background color.
Like I said in the last post, I think the photographer didn't see it in the viewfinder but like the photo so much during post processing that they digitally manipulated the tic-tac out.
Unless the orriginal is VERY different, the "nip" is nowhare near where it would have to be on a real breast. Note that the bikini top along with the way the lady is lying is pushing the top half of the breast out. There is WAY to much withen the bikini top for that not to be where the breast is.
Yes, FlyingMom. I have studied well :-)
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Programs: DL PM, HH Diamond, Fairmont Prem, SPG Gold, Priority Club Plat/IC Amb, AmEx Plat
Posts: 10,839
#60
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: DL Plat, HH Diamond, etc.
Posts: 92
Are you serious?
Unless the orriginal is VERY different, the "nip" is nowhare near where it would have to be on a real breast. Note that the bikini top along with the way the lady is lying is pushing the top half of the breast out. There is WAY to much withen the bikini top for that not to be where the breast is.
Unless the orriginal is VERY different, the "nip" is nowhare near where it would have to be on a real breast. Note that the bikini top along with the way the lady is lying is pushing the top half of the breast out. There is WAY to much withen the bikini top for that not to be where the breast is.