Community
Wiki Posts
Search

quarterly vs. monthly app(s)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 12:03 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: BOS
Posts: 49
quarterly vs. monthly app(s)

General wisdom seems to be that it is better for your credit score to apply for a bunch of cards on the same day (quarterly?) than to space them out one or two per month. Is this a theory or proven? How does quarterly affect your score differently than monthly if the total number of cards applied for ends up being equal? Where can I find information/discussion that supports this or can someone chime in on the reasoning behind it? Appreciate the input! Thanks.
sharona211 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 1:55 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Las Vegas since 11/2023
Programs: No status anywhere anymore, it was fun while it lasted
Posts: 4,648
Based on what I've seen, I doubt it matters much at all.

A credit pull dings your credit score by maybe a point or two, and it rebounds over time. I space my card applications so that I can make the minimum spends, I have never applied for two on the same day, and I have never gotten turned down (except once when Chase said I had too much credit, and then they just transferred part of my line from one card to another). I really think most people worry too much about applications and their credit scores. Now maybe if my credit score was borderline I might worry more.
redtop43 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 4:15 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 396
Originally Posted by sharona211
General wisdom seems to be that it is better for your credit score to apply for a bunch of cards on the same day (quarterly?) than to space them out one or two per month. Is this a theory or proven? How does quarterly affect your score differently than monthly if the total number of cards applied for ends up being equal? Where can I find information/discussion that supports this or can someone chime in on the reasoning behind it? Appreciate the input! Thanks.
It makes no difference to your credit score over the long run. It just increases your chance to get approved. If you do a churn every 6 months as I do, it is much better to have 4-5 inquires that are all 6 months old than 4-5 inquires that are anywhere from 1 month to 6 months old. Inquires older than 6 months supposedly have less effect on your score. If you apply every 3 months, it probably makes less of a difference but still helps.
samdori is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 4:24 pm
  #4  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: DFW
Programs: hilton gold,hyatt
Posts: 211
i try to apply all cards on same day ,so that they all fall of same month.so far none of the card got rejected ,some needed to call recon line to get approved.
newbieflyer1 is offline  
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 7:41 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Born and raised in South Carolina, now in New York City.
Posts: 534
I think the reason why most prefer quarterly or semi annual churns is because inquiries seems to matter less over time. So if you plan to get 12 cards a year you could do one a month but after the first few months you'd always have several recent queries on your credit statement. But if you did six cards twice a year you will have no recent i inquiries when you apply for new cards thus increasing your score, how the card companies view you and your chances.
saranyc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.