Checking into a hotel during a pandemic
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
i find people on this website who worry more about the way their limes are cut up on the first class bar cart than about global public health and safety, but that does not make them thought leaders.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 181
Airport security lost its way a long time ago. Disallowing sharp objects was obsolete before it was even implemented. It is no longer possible to hijack an airplane with scissors; the passengers won't allow it and the cockpit doors have been reinforced.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
A freer one. I think drivers should be held accountable for damages and injuries they cause, but the one-size-fits-all BAC standard is arbitrary; particularly as determined from breath.
Airport security lost its way a long time ago. Disallowing sharp objects was obsolete before it was even implemented. It is no longer possible to hijack an airplane with scissors; the passengers won't allow it and the cockpit doors have been reinforced.
Airport security lost its way a long time ago. Disallowing sharp objects was obsolete before it was even implemented. It is no longer possible to hijack an airplane with scissors; the passengers won't allow it and the cockpit doors have been reinforced.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
Drunks misjudge how capable they are--we need a hard standard. I do have a problem with basing it on breath, though--the technology is inherently unreliable--different people have a different ratio between blood alcohol and breath alcohol. The breathalyzer should only be a screening test to see if a blood draw is warranted, it has no business in the courtroom.
I trust the 30 year old with a BAC of 0.12 a lot more than I trust the 80 year old with a BAC of 0.00 who joins the freeway going to wrong direction. Yet nothing is being done about that.
#26
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Haze gray and underway
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, HH Diamond, Marriott 'clink clink' Titanium
Posts: 1,784
I take issue with nanny state fiefdoms suddenly deciding that they have the right to restrict and control every aspect of my life and get outraged over resistance to their over reach.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Hyperbole does not become you. It's hardly "every aspect of your life," only a few small things to protect public health. Stout insistence on elevating hypermasculine toxic individualism over the well-being of our communities is a uniquely American trait, but in this case a literally fatal one. The absurd notion that "state fiefdoms" are out to "control every aspect of your life" is preposterous. You can do anything you want in almost every aspect of your life, nobody cares what you eat for breakfast or how much you spend on movies or what books you read. But your right to swing your fists ends where my face begins, and refusing to support virus control measures is the epidemiological equivalent of punching strangers in the face. Such attitudes are why the US will be left in the dust as a recidivist object of global pity while mature countries recover and move forward.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
At least in Illinois, there are at least two types of assault claims. "Simple assault" is classified as a misdemeanor, "aggravated assault" is classified as a felony.
The reason assaulting an employee over face mask enforcement is now a felony in Illinois is because it got reclassified from "simple assault" to "aggravated assault".