Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:
A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.
It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.
Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.
A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.
It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.
Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.
LATEST UPDATES
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19
18 March travel to the UK changes
If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
- take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
- fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel
This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.
You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.
*****
The following historical information is retained for the time being.
The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.
Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules
England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)
Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html
Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made
Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)
Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf
Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[
Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.
This means that you can:[list]
- Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
- On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
- Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.
Alternatively:- Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
- Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
- On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
- Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.
If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.
If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.
Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :- Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
- Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.
- Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
- Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.
- On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.
Useful data sources:
New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments
Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
- LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
- PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
- NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]
Aug 15, 2020, 5:36 pm
#3046
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,977
Yes, there is definitely no collection of forms. You get the form emailed to you as a pdf, and if an immigration officer wants to see you can either show it on your phone or show a printed copy.
Aug 15, 2020, 5:58 pm
#3047
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ABZ/NCL
Posts: 2,943
Well half the flight hadn't filled one out online so EasyJet handed out paper forms to fill to give to UK border staff who didn't even bother collecting them on arrival. So half my flight entered the UK with no PLF submission or tracking info.
Aug 16, 2020, 1:55 am
#3048
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
No offence intended, but I think that perhaps, at times, you have a tendency to read them as though those rules had been put together by people who shared your own premice, ie written by people who did not want to impose a quarantine in the first place and I don't think that is a very realistic combination.
So at the risk of being considered as doing excessive exegesis of the government text, I can only repeat the same. I'm pretty sure that from the point of view of the legislation as it is written, then I do not think that it is allowed for him to spend the night in a hotel before his flight because that flight leaves early and it is not pleasant to set off at some unpleasant hour in the very early morning/middle of the night and it is far more convenient to spend the night in London. I think it is probably not technically permissible under the "change of place of self-isolation" unless again one makes the argument that it made it impossible for the OP to stay there given the trip commitment the next day, and I do not think that it is permissible under what you suggest which is effectively that his trip outside of the UK starts the day before his flight and spending the night at the Hilton Paddington is just the same as spending an hour in the lounge before his flight takes off. I don't think that the OP would get in trouble for doing it, I do not think that he will get fined, I do not think what he plans to do is wrong or unreasonable myself and I may well do the same in the same circumstances, but I just do not think that it is permissible from the point of view of the existing text.
Aug 16, 2020, 2:04 am
#3049
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Daily mail having some more fun, but this time with bad reporting even by its standards, this time picking on turkey
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-dropped.html
no daily mail that’s the 7 day number that is counted from 20 not the 14 day one which would be 40!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-dropped.html
- Currently there are 18.5 infections per 100,000 people in Turkey but if this increases to more than 20 then it will be added to Government's quarantine list
no daily mail that’s the 7 day number that is counted from 20 not the 14 day one which would be 40!
Aug 16, 2020, 2:06 am
#3050
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Ah, yes, I remember we had more or less the same discussion when people were asking about Basel and I was suggesting that because the airport is located fully within French territory, it was likely that from the point of view of the UK's quarantine they'd consider you had been in France if you flew through there:
My over-analysis here is copying and pasting from the British government's website. From the very beginning of the thread, I have not hidden the fact that I personally dislike the quarantine measure. However, since it is here and exists, I try to understand the rules' intentions from the point of view of the people who have set them, ie people who do believe that quarantine is necessary and what they want to implement. It's not about my intentions (I personally much prefer the way some other countries have approached travel restrictions compared to what the UK is doing) but it is about putting oneself in the shoes of the people who make the rules and believe in them to try and understand their intention.
No offence intended, but I think that perhaps, at times, you have a tendency to read them as though those rules had been put together by people who shared your own premice, ie written by people who did not want to impose a quarantine in the first place and I don't think that is a very realistic combination.
So at the risk of being considered as doing excessive exegesis of the government text, I can only repeat the same. I'm pretty sure that from the point of view of the legislation as it is written, then I do not think that it is allowed for him to spend the night in a hotel before his flight because that flight leaves early and it is not pleasant to set off at some unpleasant hour in the very early morning/middle of the night and it is far more convenient to spend the night in London. I think it is probably not technically permissible under the "change of place of self-isolation" unless again one makes the argument that it made it impossible for the OP to stay there given the trip commitment the next day, and I do not think that it is permissible under what you suggest which is effectively that his trip outside of the UK starts the day before his flight and spending the night at the Hilton Paddington is just the same as spending an hour in the lounge before his flight takes off. I don't think that the OP would get in trouble for doing it, I do not think that he will get fined, I do not think what he plans to do is wrong or unreasonable myself and I may well do the same in the same circumstances, but I just do not think that it is permissible from the point of view of the existing text.
My over-analysis here is copying and pasting from the British government's website. From the very beginning of the thread, I have not hidden the fact that I personally dislike the quarantine measure. However, since it is here and exists, I try to understand the rules' intentions from the point of view of the people who have set them, ie people who do believe that quarantine is necessary and what they want to implement. It's not about my intentions (I personally much prefer the way some other countries have approached travel restrictions compared to what the UK is doing) but it is about putting oneself in the shoes of the people who make the rules and believe in them to try and understand their intention.
No offence intended, but I think that perhaps, at times, you have a tendency to read them as though those rules had been put together by people who shared your own premice, ie written by people who did not want to impose a quarantine in the first place and I don't think that is a very realistic combination.
So at the risk of being considered as doing excessive exegesis of the government text, I can only repeat the same. I'm pretty sure that from the point of view of the legislation as it is written, then I do not think that it is allowed for him to spend the night in a hotel before his flight because that flight leaves early and it is not pleasant to set off at some unpleasant hour in the very early morning/middle of the night and it is far more convenient to spend the night in London. I think it is probably not technically permissible under the "change of place of self-isolation" unless again one makes the argument that it made it impossible for the OP to stay there given the trip commitment the next day, and I do not think that it is permissible under what you suggest which is effectively that his trip outside of the UK starts the day before his flight and spending the night at the Hilton Paddington is just the same as spending an hour in the lounge before his flight takes off. I don't think that the OP would get in trouble for doing it, I do not think that he will get fined, I do not think what he plans to do is wrong or unreasonable myself and I may well do the same in the same circumstances, but I just do not think that it is permissible from the point of view of the existing text.
if you don’t follow the rules and find a loophole or grey area that they almost created on purpose, well then it’s up to the individuals opinion of it, just like the lockdown rules which some people took literally as no using the car, while others were just doing 200 km a day joyriding. Was that legal or not? Very hard to prove it wasn’t legal, and if one gets an FPN then it will take a brave person to fight them and dare to go to court, which I personally feel the CPS would not want to go for unless it was a cast iron case.
Aug 16, 2020, 2:08 am
#3051
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 1,578
I haven’t had a PLF collected or even asked for on most of my arrivals into the U.K. since July. Yesterday the agent by the gates asked if I’d filled one in, I said yes, then used the egates. This stuff isn’t being enforced.
Aug 16, 2020, 2:09 am
#3052
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
I really don’t understand why they are making Heathrow airport employees do the job of the border force! In Greece it was a police officer that checked my form, and that is even in lieu of strict rules that don’t even let you on a plane without a completed one!
cant we check our own borders? (Ok don’t answer that
)
Aug 16, 2020, 2:18 am
#3053
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bregenz, Austria
Programs: AA, BAEC, Alaska, Flying Blue, United, IHG, Hilton
Posts: 2,950
I was thinking of going over to the UK for a few weeks in October, but I am thinking now that it's just too much hassle. Too many hoops to jump through to get there and too much crap to put up with once I am there.
Aug 16, 2020, 2:21 am
#3054
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
The Telegraph is suggesting that Public Health England (PHE) is about to be dismantled amidst continuous failings.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ealth-england/
The article suggests that it will be replaced by a new entity as early as the beginning of September (though I'd expect that the sooner the implementation, the more the replacement will likely look exactly like the original and may be a mere cosmetic change).
The main relevance here is that PHE is in charge of verifying/enforcing quarantine for people in England. I personally do not think that huge changes are to be expected from that point of view unless the new structure gets significantly larger budget and staffing, but there is at least a theoretical possibility that this may change the nature of controls which have been fairly "easy going" to date. It is also not entirely clear which of the many failings that one can think of (statistical mess up, limited enforcement, etc) or other reasons which may have nothing to do with failings (ie blaming PHE for failings which are really due to political leaders instead) are the basis for the decision, but obviously, if enforcement was listed (even if it is not the real reason), this could potentially signal a desire to toughen controls.
We'll need to wait a bit longer to know what exactly will be a potential impact on the quarantine if any at all, but there may be some.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ealth-england/
The article suggests that it will be replaced by a new entity as early as the beginning of September (though I'd expect that the sooner the implementation, the more the replacement will likely look exactly like the original and may be a mere cosmetic change).
The main relevance here is that PHE is in charge of verifying/enforcing quarantine for people in England. I personally do not think that huge changes are to be expected from that point of view unless the new structure gets significantly larger budget and staffing, but there is at least a theoretical possibility that this may change the nature of controls which have been fairly "easy going" to date. It is also not entirely clear which of the many failings that one can think of (statistical mess up, limited enforcement, etc) or other reasons which may have nothing to do with failings (ie blaming PHE for failings which are really due to political leaders instead) are the basis for the decision, but obviously, if enforcement was listed (even if it is not the real reason), this could potentially signal a desire to toughen controls.
We'll need to wait a bit longer to know what exactly will be a potential impact on the quarantine if any at all, but there may be some.
Aug 16, 2020, 2:53 am
#3055
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 1,578
Was that a uk border force agent or a Heathrow airport employee? Because if it is the latter well they have no power whatsoever to check if you have the form or not only border force do, which is why by they just emptily ask you in passing without actually checking like border force does.
I really don’t understand why they are making Heathrow airport employees do the job of the border force! In Greece it was a police officer that checked my form, and that is even in lieu of strict rules that don’t even let you on a plane without a completed one!
I really don’t understand why they are making Heathrow airport employees do the job of the border force! In Greece it was a police officer that checked my form, and that is even in lieu of strict rules that don’t even let you on a plane without a completed one!
Aug 16, 2020, 2:55 am
#3056
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 1,578
The Telegraph is suggesting that Public Health England (PHE) is about to be dismantled amidst continuous failings.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ealth-england/
The article suggests that it will be replaced by a new entity as early as the beginning of September (though I'd expect that the sooner the implementation, the more the replacement will likely look exactly like the original and may be a mere cosmetic change).
The main relevance here is that PHE is in charge of verifying/enforcing quarantine for people in England. I personally do not think that huge changes are to be expected from that point of view unless the new structure gets significantly larger budget and staffing, but there is at least a theoretical possibility that this may change the nature of controls which have been fairly "easy going" to date. It is also not entirely clear which of the many failings that one can think of (statistical mess up, limited enforcement, etc) or other reasons which may have nothing to do with failings (ie blaming PHE for failings which are really due to political leaders instead) are the basis for the decision, but obviously, if enforcement was listed (even if it is not the real reason), this could potentially signal a desire to toughen controls.
We'll need to wait a bit longer to know what exactly will be a potential impact on the quarantine if any at all, but there may be some.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...ealth-england/
The article suggests that it will be replaced by a new entity as early as the beginning of September (though I'd expect that the sooner the implementation, the more the replacement will likely look exactly like the original and may be a mere cosmetic change).
The main relevance here is that PHE is in charge of verifying/enforcing quarantine for people in England. I personally do not think that huge changes are to be expected from that point of view unless the new structure gets significantly larger budget and staffing, but there is at least a theoretical possibility that this may change the nature of controls which have been fairly "easy going" to date. It is also not entirely clear which of the many failings that one can think of (statistical mess up, limited enforcement, etc) or other reasons which may have nothing to do with failings (ie blaming PHE for failings which are really due to political leaders instead) are the basis for the decision, but obviously, if enforcement was listed (even if it is not the real reason), this could potentially signal a desire to toughen controls.
We'll need to wait a bit longer to know what exactly will be a potential impact on the quarantine if any at all, but there may be some.
Aug 16, 2020, 3:20 am
#3057
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vale of Glamorgan
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,992
I don't think it really is at all concerning: the model for the new agency will be the Robert Koch Institute, not the Stasi.
Aug 16, 2020, 3:28 am
#3058
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
Actually, I suspect the model for the new institute will be PHE! There are many structural and organisational reasons why the English system is thoroughly incapable of replicating German institutions (in health or anything else).
Aug 16, 2020, 3:32 am
#3059
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
Here are today's figures, there isn't much good news in here really, and Malta is in a terrible place. Most of the rest seems to be a slow upwards attrition. Oh and the French have started to report on a Sunday!
Note as a Mod mood maker: if quoting this post remove the chart please! Click on it in quote mode and press delete.
Note as a Mod mood maker: if quoting this post remove the chart please! Click on it in quote mode and press delete.
Last edited by corporate-wage-slave; Aug 16, 2020 at 3:47 am
Aug 16, 2020, 3:40 am
#3060
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
Is the Swiss drop correct? I’m also surprised by the U.K. figure down from 19.8 to 18.6 as the number of infections should be a net +241 (ie -771 from 1/8 and +1012 for 15/8) unless there was a change in base population?
Last edited by orbitmic; Aug 16, 2020 at 3:59 am